60 research outputs found

    A Study on the formation and change of development strategy in North Korea : focused on 1950s and 1990s

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ •์น˜ํ•™๊ณผ,1999.Docto

    Risk Society and the Transition of the Energy System: An Analysis of Energy Preference and Its Policy Implications

    No full text
    ํ›„์ฟ ์‹œ๋งˆ ์‚ฌ๊ณ  ์ดํ›„ ์„ ์ง„๊ตญ์„ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ฒด์ œ ์ „ํ™˜ ๋…ผ์Ÿ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์„ ํ˜ธ์™€ ์„ ํ˜ธ๊ตฌ์กฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์ด ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ์ด ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜ธ, ์„ ํ˜ธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ํ™”์„ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€, ๆ–ฐ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์ข…์†๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ, ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์š”์ธ(๊ฐ€์น˜์  ์š”์ธ, ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ์š”์ธ, ์ง€๊ฐ์  ์š”์ธ)๋“ค๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ 10๊ฐœ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋…๋ฆฝ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ง„๋ณด์  ์„ฑํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์‘๋‹ต์ž๋Š” ๆ–ฐ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฅผ, ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ฃผ์˜๋Š” ๅ์›์ž๋ ฅ์„, ่„ซ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ฃผ์˜๋Š” ๅํ™”์„-่ฆชๆ–ฐ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์•ˆ๋ณด ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ณผ ๊ณผํ•™์  ๋‚™๊ด€์ฃผ์˜๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ง€๊ฐ์  ์š”์†Œ ์ค‘ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ํŽธ์ต, ์‹ ๋ขฐ, ์ง€์‹ ๋“ฑ์€ ๊ฐ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ—˜๊ณผ ๋ถ€์ •์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์‹ ๋ขฐ์™€ ๋ถ€์ •์  ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์ธ์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์„ ํ˜ธ์—์„œ ํ•ต์‹ฌ์  ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.Research into the transformation of the energy system in developed countries has dramatically increased since the Fukushima accident. This study examined a variety of Koreans energy preferences and their determinants. The preference for three energy policies was adopted as the dependent variables and three factors (structural, value, perception factor) provided the ten independent variables. The results show that progressives had a preference for renewable energy, environmentalists preferred anti-nuclear energy policy, and post-materialists were anti-fossil fuel and pro-renewable energy. The threat to energy security and scientific optimism both reinforced the preference for the three energy options. The perception factors of perceived benefit, trust, and knowledge increased the preference for each energy option while perceived risk and negative image decreased it

    ํ•ญ-TAG-72 ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋Œ€์žฅ์•” ํ‘œ์  ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌ

    No full text
    Dept. of Biomedical Laboratory Science/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€]์•”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด์ƒ์ ์ธ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์ข…์–‘ ์„ธํฌ์— ํŠน์ด์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œ์ ํ™” ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ •์ƒ ์„ธํฌ์— ๋…์„ฑ์ด ์—†๊ณ , ์ „์‹ ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ „์ด๋œ ์ข…์–‘๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ์›๋ฐœ์„ฑ ์ข…์–‘์—๋„ ๋„๋‹ฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ผ ํ•ญ์ฒด๋‚˜ ๊ทธ ํ•ญ์ฒด ์ ˆํŽธ์ด ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋œ ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ์€ ์ข…์–‘์„ ํ‘œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์ „๋‹ฌ์ฒด๋กœ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํ˜„์žฌ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ „๋‹ฌ์ฒด๋Š” ์ฒด๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ „๋‹ฌํšจ์œจ๊ณผ ์„ ํƒ์  ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•„ ์ฒด๋‚ด ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค ๋ฌธ์ œ๋“ค์„ ๊ทน๋ณตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ฒด๋‚ด ์ „๋‹ฌํšจ์œจ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์œ ํ˜•์˜ ์ข…์–‘ํ‘œ์  ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ์„ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” TAG-72๊ณผ๋ฐœํ˜„ ์ข…์–‘ ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ํ‘œ์ ํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•ด liposome DNA๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์— ํ•ญ TAG-72 Fab'' ์ ˆํŽธ์„ ๋ถ€์ฐฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“  ํ•ญTAG-72 ์–‘์ด์˜จ์„ฑ ๋ฉด์—ญ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด (ILP)์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด๋Š”TAG-72ํ•ญ์›์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ์žฌ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ธ๊ฐ„ํ™” ๋‹จ์ผ ํด๋ก  ํ•ญ์ฒด HzCC49์˜ Fab'' ์ ˆํŽธ์ด ์–‘์ด์˜จ ์ง€์งˆ์ธ DMKD์™€ cholesterol, DPPE-PEG-Mal๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค (1:1:0.03 molar๋น„์œจ). ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—transferrin(Tf)์„ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งŒ๋“  ๊ฒƒ์ด Tf-๋ฉด์—ญ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ Tf-๋ฉด์—ญ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด๋Š” ๋†’์€ ๋†๋„(60% ๊นŒ์ง€)์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋”์šฑ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ธํฌ ๋‚ด ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌํ™œ์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ Tf-์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋Œ€์žฅ์•” ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ LS174T์— ์œ ์ „์ž์ „๋‹ฌ์€ ๋น„ํ‘œ์ ์„ฑ ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ 12๋ฐฐ๊นŒ์ง€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ๋” ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€, LS174T ์„ธํฌ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ์ด์ข…์ด์‹๋œ ๋ˆ„๋“œ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ์ •๋งฅ ํˆฌ์—ฌ ๋œ ํ•ญTAG-72 Tf-์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์˜ ์•”์„ธํฌ ๋‚ด ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌํ™œ์„ฑ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋น„ ํŠน์ด์  ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด์— ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งค์šฐ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ํฌํšํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ•ญTAG-72 ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ (PIL) ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•ญ TAG-72 PIL์€ POPC (91-94 mole %), DMKD (2-5 mole %), DSPE-PEG2000 (3 mole %), DSPE-PEG2000-Mal(1 mole %)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ท ์งˆ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ œ์กฐ๋œ ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ(์ง€๋ฆ„ 90-110 nm)์— ์—ญ์‹œ HzCC49์˜ Fab'' ์ ˆํŽธ์ด ๊ฒฐํ•ฉ๋˜์–ด ๋งŒ๋“ค์–ด์กŒ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ•ญ TAG-72 PIL์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด LS174T ์„ธํฌ์˜ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€์ฐฉ๋Šฅ์ด ๋›ฐ์–ด๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋†’์€ ๋†๋„์˜ ํ˜ˆ์ฒญ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ์— ๋น„ํ•ด LS174T์„ธํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌ์ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋™๋ฌผ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋„ ๋น„ํ‘œ์ ์„ฑ ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ๊ณผ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ํ•ญ TAG-72 PlL์€ ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด์‹๋œ ์ข…์–‘ ์กฐ์ง์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์ „๋‹ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•ญ TAG-72 PIL์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์•”์„ธํฌ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋œ ํ•ญ์•” ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์œ ์ „์ž์ธ angiostatin K1/3, endostatin, saxatilin์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์€ ๋ˆ„๋“œ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค์—์„œ LS174T ์ข…์–‘ ์„ฑ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ข…์–‘ ์‹ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ต์ œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Hydrodynamic ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ๋„ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋œ angiostatin K1/3, endostatin, saxatilin ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์€ ๋งˆ์šฐ์Šค์— ์ด์‹๋œMatrigel ๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์„œ์˜ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ํ˜•์„ฑ์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ต์ œ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋“ค ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์ƒ์„ฑ ์–ต์ œ ์ธ์ž๋ฅผ ๊ฐ™์ด ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•˜์˜€์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ ๊ฐ ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ B16BL6 ํ‘์ƒ‰ ์ข…์–‘ ์„ฑ์žฅ๊ณผ ์ „์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๋‹ค ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ต์ œ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์น˜๋ฃŒํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌpFLAG-AngioK1/3, pFLAG-Endo, pFLAG-Sax๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ์น˜๋ฃŒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ 86%์˜ B16BL6 ์ข…์–‘ ์–ต์ œ์™€ 90%์˜ ์ „์ด ์–ต์ œ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณผ ๋•Œ, TAG-72 ํ•ญ์›์„ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ฉด์—ญ์ง€์งˆ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ฒด(ILP)์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฆฌํฌ์†œ(PIL)์ด ์ „์‹ ์  ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ข…์–‘ ์„ธํฌ์— ์ง์ ‘ ์œ ์ „์ž๋ฅผ ์ „๋‹ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ์œ ์ „์ž ์ „๋‹ฌ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์ž„์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]An ideal therapeutics for cancer would be one that selectively targets to tumor cells and is nontoxic to normal cells, and that could be systemically delivered, thereby reaching metastases as well as primary tumor. Immunoliposomes directed by monoclonal antibody or its fragments have been considered as a promising vehicle for tumor targeted drug delivery. However, there are currently very limited data regarding immunoliposome-mediated gene delivery due to their low transfection efficiency and lack of in vivo target specificity. To overcome these obstacles, two types of noble immunoliposomes were designed for tumor targeting. The one was the anti-TAG-72 cationic immunolipoplex prepared by adding modified anti-TAG-72 Fab'' fragments to liposome/DNA complexes for targeting to TAG-72-overexpressing tumor cells. The Fab'' fragment of a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, HzCC49, specific to TAG-72 was conjugated to cationic immunoliposomes consisting of cationic lipid DMKD (O,O''-dymyrisyl-N-lysyl aspartate), cholesterol, and DPPE-PEG-Mal (1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide (poly-ethylene Glycol)2000]) (1:1:0.03, molar ratios). The anti-TAG-72 immunolipoplex was further modified by addition of transferrin (Tf-immunolipoplex). The Tf-immunolipoplex was more effective than plain lipoplexes (non-specific lipoplexes) in vitro gene transfection in the presence of a high concentration of fetal bovine serum (up to 60%). In this study, the Tf-immunolipoplex specific to TAG-72 was able to enhance gene expression in human colon adenocarcinoma LS174T cells by 12-fold, compared to the plain lipoplexes. Furthermore, the anti-TAG-72 Tf-immunolipoplexes exhibited significantly enhanced transfection to LS174T cells xenografted in nude mice 48 hr post intravenous injection while the plain lipoplexes did not. The other one was the anti-TAG-72 polyethylene glycol-coupled (PEGylated) immunoliposomes (PILs). The anti-TAG-72 PILs were constructed by conjugation of Fab'' fragments of HzCC49 to termini of PEG coupled to unilamellar liposomes (90-110 nm in diameter) to create targetability to TAG-72-overexpressing tumor cells. The PILs were prepared with POPC (1-palmitonyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine, 91-94 mole %), DMKD cationic lipid (O,O''-dymyrisyl-N-lysyl aspartate, 2-5 mole %), DSPE-PEG2000 (distearoyl-phosphatidylethanlamine-poplyethylene glycol 2000 Da, 3 mole %), and DSPE-PEG2000-Mal (DSPE-maleimide, 1 mole %). The anti-TAG-72 PILs were able to adhere to the cell surface of TAG-72-overexpressing LS174T cells more efficiently than the untargetable conventional liposomes. Also, in vitro gene transfection to LS174T cells, mediated by the anti-TAG-72 PILs in the presence of a high concentration of fetal bovine serum (up to 60%), was more effective than that by the conventional lipoplexes. In nude mice bearing TAG-72-overexpressing tumors, LS174T xenografts, the intravenously administered anti-TAG-72 PILs were more effectively localized in the tumor tissues than the untargetable liposomes. Intravenous administration of the TAG-72 immunoliposomes containing anti-cancer therapeutic genes, such as angiostain K1/3 (pFLAG-Angio K1/3), endostatin (pFLAG-Endo), and saxatilin genes (pFLAG-Sax), was able to effectively inhibit the growth of LS174T tumors and angiogenesis in the tumor tissues. In parallel, anticancer therapeutic efficacies of the genes were also evaluated by hydrodynamics-based transfection of the genes. Hydrodynamic administration of the plasmids encoding angiostatin K1-3, endostatin, or saxatilin was able to effectively inhibit angiogenesis in Matrigel-implanted mice. Hydrodynamic co-transfection of the genes was more effective in inhibition of B16BL6 melanoma growth and pulmonary metastasis in mice than administration of either gene alone. Compared to the untreated control group, the mice co-treated with pFLAG-Angio K1/3, pFLAG-Endo and pFLAG-Sax exhibited inhibition of tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis by 86% and 90%, respectively. These results demonstrate that the TAG-72-mediated targeting of immunolipoplex and immunoliposome can be recommended as a new modality for tumor-directed systemic gene delivery.prohibitio

    Socialist Transition and Changes in North Korea: From a Perspective of Comparative Socialism

    No full text
    ์ด ๊ธ€์€ ๋น„๊ต์‚ฌํšŒ์ฃผ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ์—์„œ ์‚ฌํšŒ์ฃผ์˜ ์ฒด์ œ์ „ํ™˜๋ก ์„ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „ํ™˜์˜ ์œ ํ˜•๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด(initial conditions)๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜์กด์„ฑ(path dependence)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๋’ค ์ด๋ฅผ ํ† ๋Œ€๋กœ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ถํ•œ ์ฒด์ œ์ „ํ™˜์˜ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ์ „๋งํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๊ณผ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ถ์ด ์ฒด์ œ์ „ํ™˜์— ๋‚˜์„ค ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์•„์‹œ์•„ํ˜• โ€˜์ ์ง„์  ์ฒด์ œ๊ฐœํ˜โ€™๊ณผ ์ •์น˜์ฒด์ œ์˜ ๊ทผ๋ณธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ์—†๋Š” โ€˜๋‹น-๊ตญ๊ฐ€ ์ฃผ๋„ํ˜•โ€™ ์ฒด์ œ๊ฐœํ˜์„ ์ถ”์ง„ํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๋†’๋‹ค. ์ ์ง„์ฃผ์˜(gradualism)์—์„œ๋„ ์ค‘๊ตญ ๋ฒ ํŠธ๋‚จ๋ณด๋‹ค โ€˜์ฟ ๋ฐ”ํ˜•โ€™์— ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์นœํ™”์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋ถํ•œ ํŠน์œ ์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ์—ญ์‚ฌ์  ์œ ์ œ๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ฒด์ œ์ „ํ™˜์€ ํŠน์ • ์œ ํ˜•์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ๊ณ ์œ ํ•œ โ€˜๋ถํ•œ์‹โ€™์„ ์ฐพ์„ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ง€๊ธˆ ๋‹น์žฅ์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋ถํ•œ์ ์ธ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ์„œ ์ˆ˜๋ น์ œ๋ผ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋‚ด ์กฐ๊ฑด๊ณผ ๋ถ๋ฏธ ๋‚จ๋ถ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ผ๋Š” ๋Œ€์™ธ ์กฐ๊ฑด์ด ์ฒด์ œ์ „ํ™˜์„ ๊ฐ€๋กœ๋ง‰๋Š” ์žฅ์• ์š”์ธ์ด๋‹ค. This paper will analyze the theory of socialist transition under the perspective of comparative socialism and examine initial conditions and path dependence of regime change, which determine the form and method of transition. Based on this analysis, the prospects for the future possibility of regime change and its method will be explored as well as conditions and tasks necessary to accomplish this will be suggested. If North Korea decides to pursue regime transition, it is most likely to take the Asian model of โ€œgradual systemic reformโ€ or regime reform centered on โ€œparty-state systemโ€ that will not involve any major change from its current structure. Under the explanation of gradualism, Northโ€™s regime change will resemble relatively that of โ€œCuban modelโ€ than that of China or Vietnam. However, considering the unique initial conditions and historical factors, North Koreaโ€™s regime change will not resemble a specific case type but rather a distinctive โ€œNorth Korean approachโ€ will be taken. The initial conditions of North Korea that is preventing regime change are Suryong System that governs the domestic situation and external factors of US-DPRK and inter-Korean relations.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2009๋…„ ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ํ†ต์ผํ•™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋น„ ์ง€์›์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์Œ

    Analysis of the Policy Effectiveness of the Incentive Policy for Resolving Locally Unwanted Land Use (LULU) Facility Location Conflicts in: A Focus on Nuclear Regional Support Policy

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›์ž๋ ฅ๋ฐœ์ „์†Œ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ง€์—ญ์ฃผ๋ฏผ๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž…์ง€๊ฐˆ๋“ฑ ํ•ด์†Œ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ •๋ถ€์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ง€์›์ •์ฑ…์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ค์ฆ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์›์ „ ์ง€์—ญ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€์›์ •์ฑ…์€ ์ž…์ง€ ๊ฐˆ๋“ฑ ํ•ด์†Œ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ณด์ƒ์ด๋‚˜ ์ธ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. 2005๋…„ ๋ฒ•๋ฅ ๊ฐœ์ • ์ดํ›„, ํ˜„์žฌ ์›์ „ ์ง€์—ญ์—๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ์‚ฐ์—…๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜๊ธฐ๊ธˆ์— ์˜ํ•ด ํ•ด๋‹น ์ง€์ž์ฒด์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๊ธˆ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…๊ณผ ๋ฐœ์ „์‚ฌ์—…์ž์ธ ํ•œ์ˆ˜์›์ด ์ž๊ธฐ ์ž๊ธˆ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์—…์ž์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์ด ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์›์ „ ์ง€์—ญ์ฃผ๋ฏผ๋“ค์˜ ์ธ์‹์€ ๊ธฐ๊ธˆ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…(3.06)๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์—…์ž์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…(3.05) ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณดํ†ต ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ณด์ƒํ˜•ํƒœ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‘ ์‚ฌ์—… ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ธˆ์ „์ง€๋ถˆ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์ด ํ˜„๋ฌผ๋ณด์ƒ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…๋ณด๋‹ค ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋” ๋†’์€ ๋งŒ์กฑ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์›์ „ ์ง€์—ญ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ •์ฑ…ํšจ๊ณผ ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์‹ ๊ทœ์›์ „ ์ •์ฑ…์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ์„ฑ๋ณ„(๋‚จ์„ฑ: +), ์ง€์—ญ(์˜๊ด‘โ†’๊ณ ๋ฆฌ: -), ์œ„ํ—˜์ธ์‹(-), (๊ธ์ •์ ) ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์ •(+), ํ›„์ฟ ์‹œ๋งˆ ์‚ฌ๊ณ ์ธ์‹(-)์ด ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ ์š”์ธ์ธ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ์ •์ฑ…ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ „์ฒด ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์—…์ž์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…, ์‚ฌ์—…์ž์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ˜„๋ฌผ๋ณด์ƒ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์ด ์‹ ๊ทœ์›์ „ ์ •์ฑ…์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ์ •(+)์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฒ˜๋Ÿผ, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์›์ „ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ์‹œํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์„ ๋ณด์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ธ์„ผํ‹ฐ๋ธŒ์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•ด๋ณด๊ณ , ์ง€์›์‚ฌ์—…์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ •์ฑ…ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ฆํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜๋ฏธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of the support policy implemented by the government for resolving conflicts in the location of LULU facilities for residents living near a nuclear power plant, which is a typical hazardous facility that leads to conflicts. Such a support policy for nuclear power plants (NPPs) can be said to provide an incentive or compensation in terms of location conflict resolution. Two support policies have been implemented in the location of NPPs since the amendment of the law in 2005: a fund support policy implemented by local government based on the electric power industry fund and a business support project implemented by the KHNP as a self-funded developer. The analysis showed that the perception of the residents of the NPPs in the support policies was generally at the level of overall fund support policy (3.06) and provider support project (3.05) overall. However, analysis of the classification according to compensation type showed that the monetary payments type f support projects had relatively higher satisfaction than the in-kind awards type of support projects. In addition, a regression analysis of the policy effects of the NPP support policy shows that the acceptability of new NPPs is affected by gender (male: +), region (YEONGGWANG โ†’ GORI: -), risk perception (-), positive nuclear effects (+), and Fukushima accident perception (-) were statistically significant. Considering the incentive factor f the policy effect of support policies, it was shown that support projects of the total support policy, the business support project, and the in-kind support type of the business support project had a statistically significant influence on the acceptance of the new nuclear power policy. Thus, it is meaningful in this study that the NPP support policies implemented are classified in terms of compensation and incentives, and that the policy effects are demonstrated according to the type of support policy.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2016๋…„ ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ฏผ๊ตญ ๊ต์œก๋ถ€์™€ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(NRF-2016S1 A3A2924832)

    A Perspective on North Korean Socialism : Approach of Development Strategy

    No full text

    An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Objective Levels of Nuclear Knowledge on Nuclear Acceptance: A Focus on Internet User Perception

    No full text
    ๊ธฐ์กด ์œ„ํ—˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์€ ์ฃผ๊ด€์ ๏ฝฅ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์ธก์ •๋ฐฉ์‹์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™”๋˜์–ด ๋…ผ์˜๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ด ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜๋“ค๋„ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜์ค€์ด ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์กฐ์ ˆํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ค์ฆ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž๋“ค์˜ ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜์ค€์€ ํ‰๊ท  3.62(6์  ๋งŒ์ )๋กœ ์•ฝ๊ฐ„ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ง‘๋‹จ๋ณ„ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ ์ธ์‹ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํŽธ์ต์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ •๋ถ€ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋Š” ์ €(ไฝŽ) ์ง€์‹์ง‘๋‹จ์ด ๊ณ (้ซ˜) ์ง€์‹์ง‘๋‹จ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋‚˜, ์œ„ํ—˜์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๋ถ€์ •์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์ •์€ ๊ณ (้ซ˜) ์ง€์‹์ง‘๋‹จ์—์„œ ๋” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜์ค€์€ ํŽธ์ต์ธ์‹๊ณผ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์ •, ์œ„ํ—˜์ธ์‹์— ์ด์–ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ(ฮฒ)์€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ž‘์ง€๋งŒ, ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •(+)์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ ˆํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŽธ์ต์ธ์‹์˜ ๊ธ์ •์  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”์ง€๋งŒ, ์›์ž๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์ •์˜ ๋ถ€์ •์  ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ๋„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ํ•จ์˜๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ๋“ค์„ ํ†ต์ œํ•œ ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ๋„ ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜ ์ค€์ด ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์กฐ์ ˆํšจ ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‹ค์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ฐ๊ด€์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ ์ง€์‹์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ •์ฑ…์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค

    Northeast Asian Human Rights Regime and the DPRK: Implications for Improvements in Human Rights

    No full text
    ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ ๋ ˆ์ง์ด ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ธ์‹ํ•˜์— ํ˜„์žฌ ๋™๋ถ์•„ ์ธ๊ถŒ๋ ˆ์ง์˜ ํ˜„ํ™ฉ๊ณผ ๋ฐœ์ „ ์ „๋ง์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๊ณ  ๊ตญ์ œ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๋Œ€์‘์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ด„์œผ๋กœ์จ ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋ถํ•œ ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ์ธ๊ถŒ๋ ˆ์ง์ด ์–ผ๋งˆ๋‚˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž‘์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ๊ทธ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•„์š”์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ •๋‹น์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ๋™๋ถ์•„ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ธ๊ถŒ๋ ˆ์ง์€ ์•„์ง ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๋ถํ•œ ์ธ๊ถŒ์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตญ์ œ์  ๋…ธ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Š” ์ง€์†๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฐ™์€ ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ฐœ์„ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถํ•œ์€ ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋“ค์–ด ์ด์ค‘์  ๋Œ€์‘์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ด€์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ์‹ ์ธ๊ถŒ์„ ๊ณ ์ˆ˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ์„œ๋ฐฉ์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ๊ณต์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ฒด์ œ์œ„ํ˜‘์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์  ์‚ฌ์•ˆ๋ณ„ ๋Œ€์‘์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ ๊ทน์ ์ด๊ณ  ์ „ํ–ฅ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ์Šต์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ด๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ธ๊ถŒ๋Œ€์‘์ด ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ธ๊ถŒ๋ ˆ์ง์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ๋‚˜๋ฆ„๋Œ€๋กœ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๊ฒŒ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ๋ถํ•œ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตญ์ œ์  ์ธ๊ถŒ๋ ˆ์ง์ด ํ˜•์„ฑ๋˜๊ณ  ์ œ๋„ํ™”๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ถํ•œ์ด ๊ทธ ํ‹€ ์•ˆ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ œ๋„์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•„๋“ค์ด๊ณ  ํ˜‘๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ด์ต์„ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์˜ˆ์ƒ์ผ€ ํ•œ๋‹ค. Under the notion that international human rights regime will provide a meaningful improvements in the human rights in North Korea, this article will examine the current status and future prospects of the Northeast Asian human rights regime and North Korean perception and response to the international demands for human rights. Through this effort, the possibilities and the alternatives for effective operation of human rights regime for the future will be explored to prompt improvements in North Korean human rights. Despite the necessity and legitimacy, there is clearly a lack of human rights regime in the Northeast Asian region. In the international arena, the efforts and demands for the regime is ever increasing. Recently, North Korea began to show dual response to such international demands. Although the North is still obstinate on the "human rights our way" ideology which considers human rights pressures from the West as a threat to the regime, it has began to show more assertive and affirmative attitudes on specific issues than previously. The recent change in North Korea's attitude leaves room for positive expectations on the effectiveness of human rights regime. In other words, with the establishment and institutionalization of international human rights regime-inclusive of North Korea a more optimistic outcome may be expected involving cooperation and seeking mutual benefits.์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2008๋…„ ์ •๋ถ€(๊ต์š•๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋ถ€)์˜ ์žฌ์›์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(NRF-2008-005-J01502

    An Empirical Study of the Effect of the Multidimensionality of Perceived Benefits on Acceptance of Nuclear Power

    No full text
    ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜๋Š” ํŽธ์ต์ง€๊ฐ, ์œ„ํ—˜์ง€๊ฐ, ๊ฐ์ •, ์‹ ๋ขฐ, ์ง€์‹ ๋“ฑ์˜๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ ์™”๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์€ ์ด๋“ค ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์„ ๋‹จ์ผ์ฐจ์›์˜ ๊ฐœ๋…์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์—ฌํŠน์ •๊ฐœ๋… ์•„๋ž˜ ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ•˜์œ„์ฐจ์›์„ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ํ•œ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜์ง€๊ฐ ์š”์ธ ๊ฐ€์šด๋ฐ ํŽธ์ต์ง€๊ฐ์— ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํŽธ์ต์ง€๊ฐ์˜ ๋‹ค์ฐจ์›์„ฑ์ด ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ค์ฆ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์ฐจ์›์  ํŽธ์ต์ง€๊ฐ์„ ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ์ฐจ์›, ์ง€์—ญ์  ์ฐจ์›, ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์  ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ฐจ์›์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ง€์—ญ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ง€์—ญ์  ํŽธ์ต(+), ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์  ํŽธ์ต(+), ์œ„ํ—˜์ง€๊ฐ(-), ์‹ ๋ขฐ(+), ๊ฐ์ •(-), ์ง€์‹(+) ๋“ฑ์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜์ง€๊ฐ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์ด ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ง€์—ญ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด ์ค‘์—์„œ ๊ฐ์ •๊ณผ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์  ํŽธ์ต์ด ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์  ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ฐœ์ธ์ ์ธ ํŽธ์ต(+)์€ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์ด ์•„๋‹Œ ์ง€์—ญ์  ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ์—๋งŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ์ง€์—ญ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์›์ „์ •์ฑ… ์ถ”์ง„์‹œ ์ง€์—ญ์ , ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์  ์ด์ต๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฐœ์ธ์  ์ด์ต์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‹œ์‚ฌ์ ์„ ๋„์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.Discussions on determinants of nuclear acceptance have been based on variables such as perceived benefit perception, perceived risk, affect, trust, and knowledge in previous research. Previous studies show limitations in that these determinants constitute a single dimension and they cannot distinguish various sub-dimensions existing under a specific concept. The purpose of this research is to analyze multidimensional effects of perceived benefits on the acceptance of nuclear power by paying attention to benefit perception among risk perception factors. To this end, the perceived benefit perception is divided into three dimensions: individual dimension, regional dimension, and national dimension, and nuclear acceptance is classified into social acceptance and local acceptance. First, the independent variables regional benefit (+), national benefit (+), risk perception (-), trust (+), affects and national benefits had a decisive influence on social and local acceptance. Second, it can be suggested that perceived benefit at the individual level does not affect social acceptance but local acceptance. Therefore, it can be suggested that local and national benefits as well as individual benefits are considered when implementing nuclear policy at the local level.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๊น€๊ทผ์‹(2016)์˜ ๏ฝข์›์ „์ง€์—ญ ์ฃผ๋ฏผ๋“ค์˜ ๋‹ค์ฐจ์›์  ์›์ž๋ ฅ์ˆ˜์šฉ์„ฑ ๊ฒฐ์ •์š”์ธ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๏ฝฃ, ๊ณ ๋ ค๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋ฐ•์‚ฌํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, 2016๋…„ ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ฏผ๊ตญ ๊ต์œก๋ถ€์™€ ํ•œ๊ตญ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์žฌ๋‹จ์˜ ์ง€์›์„ ๋ฐ›์•„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž„(NRF-2016S1A3A2924832)
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore