13 research outputs found

    (A) study of the characteristics of lower extremity weight bearing in independently ambulatory patients

    No full text
    보건학과/석사[ν•œκΈ€] 독립보행이 κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μž 25λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ κ³„μˆ˜ν˜• 체쀑계 2λŒ€μ™€ 높이가 각각 5cm, 10cm, 15cm인 λ””λ”€λŒ€λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ ν•˜μ§€ 체쀑지지λŠ₯λ ₯의 νŠΉμ„± 및 ν™˜μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ˜ 체쀑지지λŠ₯λ ₯을 μ΄‰μ§„μ‹œν‚€λŠ”λ° λ””λ”€λŒ€ 이용의 효과λ₯Ό μ•Œμ•„λ³΄κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 연ꡬλ₯Ό μ‹œν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν™˜μΈ‘ 및 건 μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑은 μ˜ˆλΉ„μ‹€ν—˜μ„ ν•œ 후에 μž‘μ„±ν•œ 가검사지에 κΈ°λ‘ν•˜μ—¬ 각 ν•­λͺ©λ³„ μΈ‘μ •κ°’μ˜ ν‰κ· μΉ˜λ₯Ό κ΅¬ν•œ ν›„ tκ²€μ • 및 F검정을 ν•˜μ—¬ μœ μ˜μ„±μ„ κ²€μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ³Έ 연ꡬλ₯Ό ν†΅ν•΄μ„œ λ‹€μŒκ³Ό 같은 κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ–»μ—ˆλ‹€. 1. νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μžκ°€ 평지에 κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ„ λ•Œ ν™˜μΈ‘κ³Ό κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑은 μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이가 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°(P<0.05), κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑은 전체 μ²΄μ€‘μ˜ 57.6%둜써 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑이 μ‹€λ Έλ‹€. 2. νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μžκ°€ ν™˜μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ₯Ό λ””λ”€λŒ€μ— λ”›κ³  κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ„ λ•Œ ν™˜μΈ‘ 및 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑에 μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이가 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°(p<0.05), κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑이 μ‹€λ Έλ‹€. 3.νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μžκ°€ κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ₯Ό λ””λ”€λŒ€μ— λ”›κ³  κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ„ λ•Œ ν™˜μΈ‘ 및 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑에 μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이가 μžˆμ—ˆμœΌλ©°(p<0.05), κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ₯Ό λ”›κ³  κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ””λ”€λŒ€μ˜ 높이가 λ†’μ„μˆ˜λ‘ ν™˜μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑이 μ‹€λ Έλ‹€. 4. ν™˜μΈ‘ 및 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— 관계없이 λ””λ”€λŒ€ λ°˜λŒ€μͺ½μ— μœ„μΉ˜ν•˜λŠ” ν•˜μ§€μ— μ‹€λ¦¬λŠ” 체쀑은 ν‰κ· μ μœΌλ‘œ 전체 μ²΄μ€‘μ˜ 64.62%κ°€ μ‹€λ ΈμœΌλ©° λ”›κ³  κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ””λ”€λŒ€μ˜ 높이가 λ†’μ„μˆ˜λ‘ λ””λ”€λŒ€ λ°˜λŒ€μͺ½μ— μœ„μΉ˜ν•˜λŠ” ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑이 μ‹€λ Έλ‹€. 이상과 같은 결과둜 미루어 λ³Όλ•Œ νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μžκ°€ 평지에 κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ„λ•Œ 근본적으둜 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑을 μ§€μ§€ν•˜λ©°, λ˜ν•œ λ”›κ³  κΈ°λ¦½ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” λ””λ”€λŒ€μ˜ 높이가 λ†’μ„μˆ˜λ‘ 평지에 μœ„μΉ˜ν•œ ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑을 μ§€μ§€ν•˜κ³ , ν™˜μΈ‘ 및 κ±΄μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ— 관계없이 λ””λ”€λŒ€ 반 λŒ€μͺ½μ— μœ„μΉ˜ν•œ ν•˜μ§€λ‘œ 더 λ§Žμ€ 체쀑이 μ§€μ§€λœλ‹€λŠ” 사싀을 μ•Œ 수 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ””λ”€λŒ€μ˜ μ΄μš©μ€ νŽΈλ§ˆλΉ„ ν™˜μžμ˜ ν™˜μΈ‘ν•˜μ§€μ˜ 체쀑지지λŠ₯λ ₯을 μ΄‰μ§„μ‹œν‚€κΈ° μœ„ν•œ μΉ˜λ£Œλ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ ν•©λ‹Ήν•˜λ‹€ ν•˜κ² λ‹€. μ•žμœΌλ‘œ λ””λ”€λŒ€λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ μΉ˜λ£Œλ²•μ΄ 많이 μ‚¬μš©λ˜μ–΄ 지지λ₯Ό 바라고 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 뢄야에 보닀 λ§Žμ€ 연ꡬ가 있게 되기λ₯Ό λ°”λž€λ‹€. [영문] The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist between the paretic and non-paretic lower extremity in stroke patients while weight beading. The test stance condition(posture) was standing comfortably with first the non-paretic limb and next the paretic limb, placed on a series of steps measuring 5, 10 and 15 centimeters respectively. The amound of weight borne on the respective limb was measured by a digital weight scales placed on each step. The subjects of this study were 25 hemiparetic patients being treated as admitted or out-patients at Severance Hospital(16) and Kyung Hee Medical Center(9), all of whom agreed to participate in the study. The results of the study showed first that patients in the bilateral standing condition bore significantly more weight through their non-paretic extremity(p<0.05). Next, there was significantly more weight borne on the paretic limb when the non-paretic limb was placed on any of the steps(step condition)(p<0.05). And finally, the higher the step height, the more weight was home on the non-step(standing) extremity whether paretic or non-pathetic(p<0.05). In conclusion, the study confirmed that hemiparetic patients tend to bear more weight on their non-paretic limb and that placing the non-paretic limb in the step-up position helps to facilitate increased weight bearing through the paretic limb. This type of training should be more widely used in the field of hemiplegia treatment. However, more extensive study and reports on various aspects of ambulation are needed.restrictio

    The Role of Morphological Analysis and Lexicon in NLP

    No full text
    This paper shows the role of morphological analysis and lexicon in natural language processing. The information in lexicon varies by the application fìelds. One of the difficulties in constructing lexicon is the represention of semantics. Meaning postulate and semantic decomposition are generally used for representing meaning. The morphological analysis method of Korean is given as an example

    The Status Analysis of Korean Literature in China : Take the Case of Universities in Liaoning Province

    No full text
    South Korean literature is an essential course of the Korean professional education process in colleges and universities. However, it is surveyed and found that the course is still lacking in standardization from the aspects of teaching material, teachers and so on through the thesis. The thesis takes the situation of professors from four colleges and universities in Liaoning Province as the case, and it investigates the present situation of courses offerings, the present situation of students acceptance and the teaching requirements from students by means of questionnaire surveys. And, it finds out some specific problems, and proposes corresponding reform schemes to those problems.μ£Όμ§€ν•˜λ‹€μ‹œν”Ό 쀑ꡭ μ ˆλŒ€λ‹€μˆ˜ λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ˜ ν•œκ΅­μ–΄ 전곡은 1992λ…„ μ€‘ν•œ 수ꡐ 이후에 μ„€λ¦½ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”λ° 20μ—¬ λ…„ λ™μ•ˆμ— λ§Žμ€ λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ˜ ν•œκ΅­μ–΄ 전곡은 κΈ‰μ†λ„λ‘œ λ°œμ „ν•˜μ˜€κ³  κ΅μˆ˜μ§„κ³Ό ν•™μƒμˆ˜λ„ λŒ€ν­ ν™•λŒ€λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 이에 따라 ν•œκ΅­μ–΄ν•™κ³Ό κ³Όλͺ©μ˜ μ„€μ •, ꡐ재의 편찬이 갈수둝 μ€‘μš”μ‹œλ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. λŒ€λΆ€λΆ„μ˜ λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œ ν•œκ΅­μ–΄ 전곡이 μ™Έκ΅­μ–Έμ–΄λ¬Έν•™μ˜ ν•˜μœ„ λ²”μ£Όλ‘œ κ°œμ„€λ˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— ν•œκ΅­λ¬Έν•™ κ³Όλͺ©λ„ μ—†μ–΄μ„œλŠ” μ•ˆ 될 μ€‘μš”ν•œ 자리λ₯Ό μ°¨μ§€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. λ³Έ 논문은 μ „κ΅­ 각 λŒ€ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œ ν•œκ΅­λ¬Έν•™ κ΄€λ ¨ κ³Όλͺ©μ„ κ°œμ„€ν•œ ν˜„ν™©μ„ μ‚΄νŽ΄λ³΄κ³  μš”λ…•μ„±μ˜ 4개 λŒ€ν•™μ„ μΌ€μ΄μŠ€λ‘œ 섀문쑰사λ₯Ό μ‹€μ‹œν–ˆλ‹€. μš”λ…•μ„±μ— ν˜„μž¬ ν•œκ΅­μ–΄ 전곡을 κ°œμ„€ν•œ λŒ€ν•™κ΅(μ „λ¬ΈλŒ€λŠ” λ…Όμ™Έλ‘œ)λŠ” λŒ€λ ¨μ™Έκ΅­μ–΄λŒ€ν•™κ΅(λŒ€λ ¨), μš”λ…•λŒ€ν•™κ΅(심양), λŒ€λ ¨λ―Όμ‘±λŒ€ν•™κ΅(λŒ€λ ¨), μš”λ™λŒ€ν•™κ΅(단동) λ“± λ„€ 개 λŒ€ν•™μ΄ μžˆλ‹€. 이번 쑰사λ₯Ό 톡해 ν•œκ΅­λ¬Έν•™ ꡐ윑의 λ¬Έμ œμ μ„ μ°Ύμ•„λ‚΄κ³  ν•΄κ²°λ°©μ•ˆμ„ μ œμ‹œν•˜μ˜€λŠ”λ° ν•œκ΅­λ¬Έν•™ κ΅μˆ˜λ²•μ„ ν˜μ‹ ν•˜λŠ” 데에 μœ μš©ν•œ κ·Όκ±°κ°€ 되기λ₯Ό λ°”λž€λ‹€

    ν† λ‘ 

    Get PDF
    저희가 본래 ν•œ μ‹œκ°„ κ°€λŸ‰ 토둠을 ν•  μƒκ°μ΄μ—ˆλŠ”λ°, μ£Όμ œλ°œν‘œν•΄ μ£Όμ‹œλŠ” λΆ„λ“€κ»˜μ„œ μ•„μ£Ό 쒋은 λ‚΄μš©μ„ μžμ„Έν•˜κ²Œ 말씀해 μ£Όμ‹œλŠλΌκ³  μ‹œκ°„μ΄ 많이 μ§€λ‚¬μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 뢈과 40λΆ„ 정도밖에 남지 μ•Šμ•˜κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— 효과적인 λ°©λ²•μœΌλ‘œ 이야기λ₯Ό 진행해야 ν•  것 κ°™μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 였늘 정희성 μ„ μƒλ‹˜κ»˜μ„œλŠ” ꢌ혁철 μ„ μƒλ‹˜μ΄ λ°œν‘œν•΄ μ£Όμ‹  λ‚΄μš©μ˜ 끝뢀뢄을 도와주신 μ…ˆμ΄κ³ , κ²°κ΅­ μ„Έ λΆ„κ»˜μ„œ 발제λ₯Ό ν•΄μ£Όμ…¨λŠ”λ°, 'ν˜•νƒœλ‘ κ³Ό μ–΄νœ˜λΆ€'λΌλŠ” 제λͺ© μ•„λž˜μ„œ 우리 언어학이 μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 문제λ₯Ό μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ 닀루며, μš”μ¦ˆμŒ 전산학이 μžμ—°μ–Έμ–΄μ²˜λ¦¬λ₯Ό ν•˜λŠ”λ°, parsing이라든가 μ—¬λŸ¬ 가지 λ‹€λ₯Έ 뢀뢄이 μžˆκ² μ§€λ§Œ, 특히 lexicon의 ꡬ성을 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ ν•˜λŠ” 것이 ν˜„μž¬λ‘œμ„œ 쒋은 λ°©μ•ˆμ΄ 될 것이냐λ₯Ό λ³΄κ² μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€

    ν† λ‘ 

    No full text
    κ°μ‚¬ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ΅œκ·Όμ— λ“€μ–΄μ„œ μˆ˜λ…„λ™μ•ˆ μ–Έμ–΄ν•™ 뢄야와 μ „μ‚°ν•™ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 곡동연ꡬ 내지 μž‘μ—…μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λŠ” κ°€μš΄λ°, 1986년도 ν•œκ΅­κ³Όν•™μž¬λ‹¨μ˜ 지원을 λ°›μ•„β€˜λͺ©μ²™κΈ°μ΄ˆμ—°κ΅¬β€™λΌκ³  ν•˜λŠ” 정책연ꡬ 쀑에 β€˜μžμ—°μ–Έμ–΄μ²˜λ¦¬μ˜ κΈ°μ΄ˆμ—°κ΅¬β€™λΌλŠ” 3λ…„ κ³„νšμ˜ μ—°κ΅¬κ³Όμ œκ°€ 주어진 λ°” μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. κ·Έ 과제λ₯Ό 마침 이 μžλ¦¬μ— κ³„μ‹œλŠ” μ„œμšΈλŒ€ μ–Έμ–΄ν•™κ³Όμ˜ μž₯석진 μ„ μƒλ‹˜κ»˜μ„œ 맑아 μ˜€μ…¨κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ—οΌŒμ—°κ΅¬μ˜ λͺ©μ μ΄λ‚˜οΌŒμ§„행과정에 λŒ€ν•΄μ„œ λ“£λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 이 ν† λ‘ νšŒλ₯Ό μ‹œμž‘ν•˜λ„λ‘ ν•˜κ² μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μž₯석진 : μ§€κΈˆ 이청민 μ‚¬νšŒκ»˜μ„œ μ΄μ•ΌκΈ°ν•˜μ‹  λŒ€λ‘œοΌŒκ³Όν•™μž¬λ‹¨μ—μ„œ ν›„μ›ν•˜λŠ” λͺ©μ  기초 μ—°κ΅¬κ³Όμ œλ‘œμ„œοΌŒ1986년에 μ‹œμž‘ν–ˆκ³  이제 3차년도에 λ“€μ–΄κ°€κ³  μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. β€˜λͺ©μ κΈ°μ΄ˆκ³Όμ œβ€™λΌλŠ” 것은 β€˜νŠΉμ •κ³Όμ œβ€™μ™€ λŒ€μ‘°λ˜λŠ” λ§μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 즉 νŠΉμ •κ³Όμ œκ°€ κ°€κΉκ²Œ μ‚°μ—…κ³Ό μ§κ²°λœλ‹€κ³  ν•˜λ©΄οΌŒλͺ©μ κΈ°μ΄ˆλŠ” κ·ΈλŸ¬ν•œ μ˜λ―Έμ—μ„œλŠ” basicν•˜κ³  학ꡬ적인 κ²ƒμ΄μ§€μš”
    corecore