27 research outputs found

    (The) effects of two educational approaches regarding drug use on the change of knowledge and attitudes among the girl's high school students

    No full text
    λ³΄κ±΄κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/석사[ν•œκΈ€] μ˜€λŠ˜λ‚ μ€ μ•½μ˜ 였용과 λ‚¨μš©μ˜ μ‹œλŒ€λΌκ³  일컬을 μ •λ„λ‘œ μ‚¬λžŒλ“€μ€ μžμ‹ μ˜ 고톡, λΆˆμ•ˆ, κΈ΄μž₯, 톡증을 ν•΄κ²°ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ 약을 만λŠ₯으둜 μ•Œκ³  μ‚¬μš©ν•˜κ³  있으며, μ΅œκ·Όμ—λŠ” ν–₯락문화와 ν•¨κ»˜ 각쒅 λ§ˆμ•½λ₯˜κ°€ μ‚¬νšŒμ €λ³€μœΌλ‘œ ν™•μ‚°λ˜λ©΄μ„œ μ²­μ†Œλ…„μΈ΅κΉŒμ§€ ν­λ„“κ²Œ μΉ¨νˆ¬λ˜μ–΄ κ°€κ³  μžˆμ–΄ μ‹¬κ°ν•œ μ‚¬νšŒλ¬Έμ œλ‘œ λŒ€λ‘λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ ꡐ윑 μ œλ„μƒμ˜ 문제점으둜 μΈν•˜μ—¬ μ•½λ¬Όλ‚¨μš©μ΄λ‚˜ λΉ„ν–‰μ˜ 취약성이 μžˆλŠ” ν•™μƒμΌμˆ˜λ‘ 보호 λ°›κΈ°λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” λ°˜λŒ€λ‘œ λΉ μ Έλ“€ κΈ°νšŒμ— 더 λ…ΈμΆœλ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ―€λ‘œ μ˜¬λ°”λ₯Έ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš© 및 μ˜€Β·λ‚¨μš© μ˜ˆλ°©κ΅μœ‘μ— κ΄€ν•œ νŠΉλ³„ν•œ 관심과 λ°°λ €κ°€ μš”κ΅¬λ˜λ©° ν•™κ΅κ΅μœ‘μ—μ„œ λ³„λ„μ˜ μ•½λ¬Όκ΅μœ‘ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ 두어 μ˜ˆλ°©κ΅μœ‘μ„ μ‹€μ‹œν•˜κ±°λ‚˜ μ •κ·œκ΅κ³Ό κ³Όλͺ©μ˜ λ‚΄μš©μ†μ— μ•½λ¬Όμ˜ μ˜¬λ°”λ₯Έ μ‚¬μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ 뢀뢄이 ν•œ μ˜μ—­μ„ 차지할 수 μžˆλ„λ₯΅ μ œλ„ν™”ν•˜λ €λŠ” λ…Έλ ₯이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ—¬κ³ μƒλ“€μ—κ²Œ μ•½λ¬Ό μ˜€Β·λ‚¨μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ κ΅μœ‘μ„ ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ 지식 및 νƒœλ„λ₯Ό λ³€ν™”μ‹œμΌœ κΆκ·Ήμ μœΌλ‘œλŠ” μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš© 행동을 λ³€ν™”μ‹œν‚¬ 수 μžˆλŠ”κ°€λ₯Ό 규λͺ…ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ μ‹œλ„λœ 연ꡬ이닀. 연ꡬ방법은 μ„œμšΈ μ‹œλ‚΄μ˜ λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ 지역에 μ†ν•œ 2개의 인문계 μ—¬μžκ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œ 2ν•™λ…„ 학생듀을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 각 ꡰ의 λŒ€ν‘œμ„±μ„ μœ μ§€ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ 인문계 μ—¬μž 고등학ꡐ 2ν•™λ…„ 학생을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ˜€κ³  μ‹€ν—˜μ˜ 확산을 λ°©μ§€ν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ 각각 λ‹€λ₯Έ ν•™κ΅μ˜ 학생듀을 2κ°œλ°˜μ”© μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 제 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅° ν•™κ΅μ—μ„œλŠ” κ΅λ ¨μˆ˜μ—… 쀑 ꡐ련ꡐ사에 μ˜ν•΄ λͺ©μ μ„ λͺ…ν™•ν•˜κ²Œ μ„€λͺ…ν•΄ μ£Όκ³  사전 μ§ˆλ¬Έμ§€κ°€ λ°°λΆ€λ˜μ–΄ νšŒμˆ˜ν•œ ν›„ λ°”λ‘œ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš© κ΅μœ‘μ„ μœ„ν•œ V.T.R.을 μ‹œμ²­ν† λ‘ ν•˜μ˜€λŠ”λ° μ‹œμ²­μ‹œ κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ κ°œμž…μ΄ μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€. 제 2 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” κ΅λ ¨μˆ˜μ—…μ€‘μ— ꡐ사에 μ˜ν•΄ 사전 μ§ˆλ¬Έμ§€λ₯Ό μ‘°μ‚¬ν•œ ν›„ ꡐ윑이 μ‹€μ‹œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. κ΅μœ‘λ°©λ²•μ€ slideλ₯Ό λ³΄λ©΄μ„œ κ΄€λ ¨λœ μ„€λͺ… Tape을 λ“£κ³  λ‚œ ν›„ slide의 λ‚΄μš©κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ κ΅λ ¨κ΅μ‚¬μ˜ μ„€λͺ…이 μžˆμ—ˆκ³ , μ„€λͺ…이 λλ‚œ ν›„ ν•™μƒλ“€μ˜ μ§ˆλ¬Έλ“±μ„ λ°›μ•„ λ°˜μ‘μ„ ν™•μΈν•˜λŠ” κ΅μœ‘μ„ μ‹€μ‹œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μžλ£Œμˆ˜μ§‘μ€ 4μ›” 15일뢀터 4μ›” 30μΌκΉŒμ§€ 2주에 κ±Έμ³μ„œ μ‹€μ‹œ λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μˆ˜μ§‘λœ μžλ£ŒλŠ” 제 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ 104λΆ€μ˜€λŠ”λ° 응닡이 λΆˆμ„±μ‹€ν•œ 섀문지λ₯Ό μ œμ™Έν•œ 100λΆ€λ₯Ό 연ꡬ에 μ‚¬μš©ν•˜μ˜€κ³  제 2 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ 100λΆ€κ°€ νšŒμˆ˜λ˜μ–΄ 이λ₯Ό λͺ¨λ‘ μ‚¬μš© ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μΆ”ν›„μ‘°μ‚¬μ—μ„œλŠ” 제 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ 105λΆ€, 제 2 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ 110λΆ€κ°€ 회수 λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜ 사전에 μˆ˜μ§‘λœ μžλ£Œμ™€ κ³ μœ λ²ˆν˜Έκ°€ λ§žλŠ” κ²ƒλ§Œμ„ μžλ£Œμ²˜λ¦¬μ‹œ μ‚¬μš© ν•˜μ—¬ 총 400λΆ€κ°€ λΆ„μ„μ‹œμ— μ‚¬μš© λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. μžλ£ŒλŠ” SPSSλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ „μ‚°μ²˜λ¦¬ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 뢄석을 μœ„ν•΄ μ‹€μˆ˜μ™€ λ°±λΆ„μœ¨, Chi-square test, paired t-test, t-test, AN0VA검증을 μ‹€μ‹œ ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 이 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” λ‹€μŒκ³Ό κ°™λ‹€. 1. 학생듀이 졜근 3κ°œμ›”λ™μ•ˆ κ°€μž₯ 많이 μ‚¬μš©ν–ˆλ˜ 약물은 '감기약'으둜 전체 ν•™μƒμ˜ 68%κ°€ λ³΅μš©μ„ ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 'μ†Œν™”μ œ'κ°€ 60%, 'μ—°κ³ μ œ'κ°€ 40.5%, 'μ§„ν†΅μ œ'κ°€ 36.5%, 'λ“œλ§ν¬'κ°€ 33.5%, 'μ˜μ–‘μ œ'κ°€ 29%, 'ν•΄μ—΄μ œ' 20%의 순으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬μœΌλ©°, 'μ•Œμ½œ'은 전체 μ‘λ‹΅μž μ€‘μ—μ„œ 16λͺ…, 'κ°μ„±μ œ(타이밍)'λŠ” 9λͺ…, '수면제', 'ν‘μž…μ œ'λŠ” 단 1λͺ…λ§Œμ΄ μ‚¬μš©κ²½ν—˜μ΄ μžˆλ‹€κ³  μ‘λ‹΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 2. 제 1 κ°€μ„€ "κ΅μœ‘μ„ 받기전에 λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅μœ‘ν›„μ— μ§€μ‹μ˜ μ μˆ˜κ°€ 높을 것이닀"에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œλŠ” κ΅μœ‘μ „ 지식 μ μˆ˜μ™€ 평균이 29.l850μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , ꡐ윑 μ‹€μ‹œ ν›„μ—λŠ” 36.8150으둜 지식 점수의 κ°œμ„ μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§€λ―€λ‘œμ¨ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό 보여주고 μžˆλ‹€(t=-11.88, p<.001). λ”°λΌμ„œ 제 1 가섀은 μ§€μ§€λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 3. 제 2 κ°€μ„€ "κ΅μœ‘μ„ 받기전에 λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ κ΅μœ‘ν›„μ— νƒœλ„μ˜ μ μˆ˜κ°€ 높을 것이닀"에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œλŠ” κ΅μœ‘μ „μ˜ νƒœλ„ 점수의 평균이 57.6131μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , ꡐ윑 μ‹€μ‹œν›„μ—λŠ” 평균 59.7538둜 νƒœλ„ 점수의 κ°œμ„ μ΄ μ΄λ£¨μ–΄μ§μœΌλ‘œμ¨ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€(t=-4.84, p<.001). λ”°λΌμ„œ 제 2 가섀도 μ§€μ§€λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 4. 제 3 가섀인 "slide의 λ‚΄μš©μ„ ꡐ사가 μ„€λͺ…ν•œ ꡐ윑ꡰ이 V.T.R.μ‹œμ²­λ§ŒμœΌλ‘œ κ΅μœ‘λ°›μ€ ꡰ보닀 μ§€μ‹λ³€ν™”μ˜ μ μˆ˜κ°€ 높을 것이닀"μ—μ„œλŠ” μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ μ§€μ‹μ˜ μ μˆ˜μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ 제 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°(V.T.R.μ‹œμ²­)의 경우 κ΅μœ‘μ „Β·ν›„μ— μ§€μ‹μ μˆ˜λŠ” 평균 7.5500점이 μ¦κ°€λ˜μ—ˆκ³ , 제 2 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°(slide ꡐ윑)에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œλŠ” 평균 7.7100점이 증가 λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ―€λ‘œ 두 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ€ ν‰κ· μ˜ 차이둜만 λ³Έλ‹€λ©΄ slideλ₯Ό ꡐ사가 μ„€λͺ…ν•œ ꡐ윑ꡰ이 V.T.R.을 μ‹œμ²­ν•œ ꡐ윑 ꡰ보닀 μ§€μ‹μ˜ ν–₯상이 쑰금 더 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€κ³  ν•  수 μžˆκ² λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 두 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ ν‰κ· μ˜ μ°¨μ΄λŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό 보여주고 μžˆμ§€ λͺ»ν•˜λ―€λ‘œ(t=-1.12, p>.05) 제 3 가섀은 μ§€μ§€λ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 5. 제 4 가섀인 "slide의 λ‚΄μš©μ„ ꡐ사가 μ„€λͺ…ν•œ ꡐ윑ꡰ이 V.T.R.μ‹œμ²­λ§ŒμœΌλ‘œ κ΅μœ‘λ°›μ€ ꡰ보닀 νƒœλ„ λ³€ν™”μ˜ μ μˆ˜κ°€ 높을 것이닀"λŠ” 제 1 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°(V.T.R. ꡐ윑)μ—μ„œ ꡐ윑 μ „Β·ν›„μ˜ ν‰κ· μ˜ 차이가 1.4242이며 제 2 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°(slide ꡐ윑)μ—μ„œλŠ” 2.8500으둜 두 ꡰ의 ν‰κ· μ˜ μ°¨μ΄λ§ŒμœΌλ‘œλŠ” slideλ₯Ό ꡐ사가 μ„€λͺ…ν•΄μ€€ ꡐ윑ꡰ이 νƒœλ„μ˜ λ³€ν™” μ μˆ˜κ°€ 더 증가λ₯Ό 보이고 μžˆμœΌλ‚˜ λ‘κ΅°μ˜ 평균 차이λ₯Ό 검증해 λ³Έ κ²°κ³Ό ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό λ³Ό 수 μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€(t=-1.62, p>.05). λ”°λΌμ„œ 제 4 가섀도 μ§€μ§€λ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 결둠적으둜 약물에 κ΄€ν•˜μ—¬ μ œμž‘λœ 자료λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μˆ˜μ—…μ€‘μ— ν–‰ν•˜μ—¬μ§„ ꡐ윑이 μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ 지식과 νƒœλ„μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ ν–₯상을 κ°€μ Έλ‹€ μ£Όμ—ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ ꡐ윑 방법별 효과의 λΉ„κ΅μ—μ„œλŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이λ₯Ό λ³΄μ΄μ§€λŠ” λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€μ§€λ§Œ V.T.R.λ§Œμ„ μ‹œμ²­ν•œ 집단보닀 slideλ₯Ό ꡐ사가 μ„€λͺ…ν•œ μ§‘λ‹¨μ—μ„œ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš©μ— κ΄€ν•œ 지식과 νƒœλ„μ˜ ν–₯상이 더 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν† λŒ€λ‘œ μ•½λ¬Όμ‚¬μš©μ— μžˆμ–΄μ„œ μ˜¬λ°”λ₯Έ 결정을 내릴 수 μžˆμ„ 뿐 μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μžμ‹ μ˜ 건강을 슀슀둜 관리할 μˆ˜λ„ μžˆλŠ” μ•½λ¬Όκ΅μœ‘μ΄ μ •κ·œμˆ˜μ—… 쀑에 μ œλ„μ μœΌλ‘œ 체계λ₯Ό κ°–μΆ”μ–΄ 이루어지기 μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ •μ΄ κ°œμ„ λ˜μ–΄μ•Ό ν•˜λ©° ν•™μƒμˆ˜μ€€μ— λ§žλŠ” 효과적인 ꡐ 재개발 및 κ΅μ‚¬λ“€μ˜ 약물에 λŒ€ν•œ 재ꡐ윑이 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  λ³Έλ‹€. [영문] This quasi-experimental study was designed to test the effects of educational approaches to the drug abuse and misuse on the students' knowledge and attitudes toward drug use behavior. The subjects for the first experimental group were a group of one hundred and four high school students enrolled in girls' high school located in Seoul and for the second experimental group, one hundred high school students. For the first experimental group, the purpose of this study was clearly given by the teacher and a pre-test questionnaires were distributed. Directly after the collection of the pre-test questionnaires, audio-visual education (by V.T.R.) was done without any intervention by the teacher. For the second experimental group,pre-test questionnaires were followed by a slide presentation education at program. This group was allowed to watch the slide while listening to relevant an explanation through a tape-recorder and was given an explanation on the contents of the slides by the teacher. Students were allowed to ask questions to make sure that they understood. Data for this study were gathered from April 15th to April 30th, 1991. Even though one hundred and four subjects were chosen for the first experimental group, four subjects who did not completely fill in the questionnaier were excluded from the data analysis. For the second group, one hundred questionnaires were all included in the data analysis. For the post-test questionnaires, the one hundred and five questionnaires for the first experimental group, and the one hundred and ten questionnaires for the second group were collected However, the data were analyzed on the total member of questionnaires in which there was a complete set of pre-test and post-test questionnaires. For the data analysis, quantities and percentages were used to examine the general characteristics and aspects and types of drug use. A Chi-square test was used to determine similarities between the experimtental group. A paired t-test was used to verify the hypothesis on knowledge and attitudes toward drug use after the education on drug use for the experimental group. A t-test was used to verify the hypothesis given about knowledge and attitude toward drug use according to the two educational approaches. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The drugs which were most used by students for three months(January lst to March 30th, 1991) were cold medicines(68%), digestants(60%), topical agents(40.5%) and analgesics(36.5%). On the other hand, the illegal use of drugs was limited to alcohol(16 students), stimulants(9 students), only one students used rubber cement. 2. The first hypothesis, "the scores on the knowledge scale of received education will be higher" was supported. After receiving education, the average score of the pre education was 29.1850, and that average score of post education was 36.8150. The results showed the experimental group had more changes on the knowledge scale and there was a significant difference on the two groups(t=-11.88, p<.001). Therefore, this hypothesis was supported. 3. The second hypothesis, "the scores of the attitude scale of received education will be higher" was supported. After receiving education, the average score of the pre education was 57.6131, and that average score of post education was 59.7538. The results showed the experimental group had more changes on the attitude scale and there was a significant difference on the two groups(t=-4.84, p<.001). Therefore, this hypothesis was supported. 4. The third hypothesis, "the scores of the knowledge scale of the group which was given a teacher's explanation on the content of the slide presentation will be higer than the group educated only through the video presentation" was not supported. There was an increase in the average of 7.7100 in the scores of the knowledge scale for the first experimental group(V.T.R. education) and there was an increase in the average of 7.7100 in the scores of the knowledge scale for the second experimental group. According to the difference in the average score, it can be said that there was more improvement in the second experimental group than in the first experimental group. However, there was no significant difference between the two average scores. Therefore, this hypothesis was not supported. ( t=-1.12, p>.05) 5. The fourth hypothesis, "the scores of the attitude scale of the experimental group which was given a teacher's explanation on the content of the slide presentation will be higher than that of the experimental group which was educated only through the video presentation" was not supported. The difference in the average score was 1.4242 for the first experimental group (V.T.R. education), and the difference in the average score was 2.8500 for the second experimental group(slide education). According to the differences of average scores, the second experimental group showed more change in the attitude scale. However, there was no significant difference between the average scores( t=-1.62, p>.05). Therefore, the fourth hypothesis was not supported. According to these results, the educationnal aids on drug use are said to be effective enough to improve the knowledge and attitudes toward drug use, however the aids only caused a meaningful change only in the knowledge of drug use. As far as the effects of the different educational approaches are concerned, the first experimental group(V.T.R. education) showed more improvement than the second group(slide education) in knowledge and attitude toward drug use. Although V.T.R. education can be said to be more effective, but it is clear that the intervention of the teacher during the regular classes can improve the education effects. Hence comes the urgent necessity of the re-education of teachers about effective teaching methods and drug use so that the right decision can be made by students about drug use and health maintenance. Meaningful drug education can be done during the regular classes.restrictio

    Development and effectiveness of school-based obesity management program for high school girls

    No full text
    κ°„ν˜Έν•™κ³Ό/박사[ν•œκΈ€]λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” κ³Όμ²΄μ€‘μ΄μƒμ˜ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ—κ²Œ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬μ— νš¨κ³Όκ°€ μžˆλ‹€κ³  μΈμ •λ˜λŠ” μ‹μ΄μš”λ²•κ³Ό μš΄λ™μš”λ²•μ„ μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ ν–‰λ™μš”λ²•μ„ μ μš©ν•˜μ—¬ ν•™κ΅μƒν™œ 쀑에 μ‹€μ‹œ κ°€λŠ₯ν•œ β€˜κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ μ—¬ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨β€™μ„ κ°œλ°œν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 개발된 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ€ 비동등성 λŒ€μ‘°κ΅° μ „ν›„ μ‹€ν—˜μœΌλ‘œ μ„€κ³„ν•˜μ—¬ 효과λ₯Ό 규λͺ…ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.개발된 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ€ μ „λ¬Έκ°€μ˜ λ‚΄μš© 타당도λ₯Ό κ±°μ³μ„œ μ™„μ„±ν•˜μ—¬ κ³„λ°œν™œλ™ μ‹œκ°„μ„ μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ 2006λ…„ 3μ›” 18일뢀터 2006λ…„ 6μ›” 10μΌκΉŒμ§€ 12μ£Όκ°„ μ€‘μž¬λ₯Ό ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ€ μ„œμšΈμ‹œλ‚΄ 남녀곡학 고등학ꡐ에 μž¬ν•™ 쀑인 여고생 μ€‘μ—μ„œ 과체쀑 μ΄μƒμ˜ 학생 23λͺ…을 μ„ μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ˜ μ‹€μ‹œ μ „κ³Ό 후에 λΉ„λ§Œμ§€μˆ˜μΈ μ²΄μ§ˆλŸ‰μ§€μˆ˜, 체지방λ₯ , μ œμ§€λ°©, κ·Όμœ‘λŸ‰μ„ 체지방 뢄석기λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λͺΈν†΅λ₯ μ„ μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 섀문지λ₯Ό ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ 식이 자기효λŠ₯감, μš΄λ™ 자기효λŠ₯감, μžμ•„μ‘΄μ€‘κ°μ„ μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ€ 22λͺ…μ΄μ—ˆκ³ , μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό 후에 μΈ‘μ •λœ 결과물에 λŒ€ν•œ μƒλ‹΄λ§Œμ„ μ‹€μ‹œν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.1. 개발된 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ€ CDC의 ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ μ²­μ†Œλ…„ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ κ°€μ΄λ“œλΌμΈμ„ 기반으둜 첫째, μžκΈ°κ΄€μ°°, 자극쑰절, κ°•ν™”, μ‚¬νšŒμ  지지, 그리고 λ³€ν™”λœ λ‚˜λ₯Ό μΈμ§€ν•˜λŠ” 5단계 ν–‰λ™μš”λ²•, λ‘˜μ§Έ, Epstein의 μ‹ ν˜Έλ“± μš”λ²•κ³Ό Can-Pro 2.0을 μ΄μš©ν•œ 식이 뢄석 λ“±μ˜ μ‹μ΄μš”λ²•, μ…‹μ§Έ, μ€„λ„˜κΈ°μ™€ 슀트레칭 μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ μš΄λ™μš”λ²•μ„ ν•΅μ‹¬λ‚΄μš©μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.2. ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ 효과 ν‰κ°€ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨ μ‹€μ‹œ ν›„ νš¨κ³Όν‰κ°€λ₯Ό μœ„ν•˜μ—¬ SPSS Windows 12.0 ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ 톡계 뢄석을 ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€.제 1κ°€μ„€ β€˜κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•œ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ΄ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ— λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ λΉ„λ§Œ μ§€μˆ˜κ°€ ν–₯상될 것이닀’λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό,μ²΄μ§ˆλŸ‰μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œ(t = 5.861, p = .000)ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ‚˜ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ€ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€(t = .438, p = .666). μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œλœ 차이(t = 2.725, p = .009)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.체지방λ₯ μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œ(t = 3.941, p = .000)λ˜μ—ˆκ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ€ 거의 λ³€ν™”κ°€ μ—†μ—ˆμœΌλ©°, μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œλœ 차이(t = 2.319, p = .025)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.μ œμ§€λ°©μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ 증가(t = -1.997, p = .050)ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” 거의 λ³€ν™”κ°€ μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λœ 차이(t = -2.257, p = .029)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.κ·Όμœ‘λŸ‰μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ 증가(t = -2.091, p = .042)ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” 였히렀 κ·Όμœ‘λŸ‰μ΄ κ°μ†Œ(t = .751, p = .462) ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λœ 차이(t = -2.084, p = .043)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.λͺΈν†΅λ₯ μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°κ³Ό λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œ λͺ¨λ‘ λ™μΌν•˜κ²Œ 0.01%κ°€ κ°œμ„  λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜, μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œλœ 차이(t = .272, p = .787)κ°€ μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€.제 2 κ°€μ„€ β€˜κ³ λ“±ν•™κ΅ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•œ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ΄ μ‹œν–‰ν•˜μ§€ μ•Šμ€ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ— λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ 심리적 μš”μΈ μ μˆ˜κ°€ 증가할 것이닀’λ₯Ό κ²€μ¦ν•œ κ²°κ³Ό,μ‹μ΄νš¨λŠ₯감은 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ 증가(t = -3.661, p = .000)ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€(t = -1.142, p = .271). μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λœ 차이(t = 2.427, p = .019)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.μš΄λ™νš¨λŠ₯감은 μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ 증가(t = -3.315, p = .000)ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν–ˆλ‹€(t = -.502, p = .631). μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ μ¦κ°€λœ 차이(t = -3.201, p = .003)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.μžκΈ°μ‘΄μ€‘κ°μ€ μ‹€ν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ μ‹€ν—˜ 전에 λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ .90점이 증가(t = -.214, p = .842)ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ—μ„œλŠ” μ‹€ν—˜ 전에 λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ 였히렀 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•˜κ²Œ κ°μ†Œ(t = 2.531, p = .023)ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μ‹€ν—˜ μ „κ³Ό ν›„μ˜ 두 ꡰ은 ν†΅κ³„μ μœΌλ‘œ μœ μ˜ν•œ 차이(t = -2.209, p = .033)κ°€ μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€.μ΄μƒμ˜ λ³Έ 연ꡬ 결과둜 μ‹μ΄μš”λ²•, μš΄λ™μš”λ²•μ„ ν¬ν•¨ν•œ ν–‰λ™μš”λ²•μœΌλ‘œ κ΅¬μ„±λœ ν•™κ΅κΈ°λ°˜ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬ ν”„λ‘œκ·Έλž¨μ€ λΉ„λ§Œ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ 체쀑과 μ²΄μ§ˆλŸ‰, μ²΄μ§€λ°©μœ¨, κ·Όμœ‘λŸ‰μ˜ λΉ„λ§Œμ§€μˆ˜λ₯Ό κ°μ†Œμ‹œμΌ°κ³ , 심리적 μš”μΈμΈ μ‹μ΄νš¨λŠ₯감과 μš΄λ™νš¨λŠ₯감, μžμ‘΄κ°μ„ μ¦μ§„μ‹œν‚΄μ„ μž…μ¦ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λΉ„λ§Œ μ—¬κ³ μƒμ˜ ν•™κ΅μƒν™œμ„ ν†΅ν•œ 식사 쑰절과 μš΄λ™μ„ ν–‰λ™μš”λ²•μ— μ μš©μ‹œν‚΄μœΌλ‘œμ¨ λΉ„λ§Œκ΄€λ¦¬κ°€ 될 수 μžˆλŠ” κ·Όκ±°λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. [영문]In this study, a school-based obesity management program for high school girls, which was integrated with behavioral modification, diet and exercise therapy and was easily applicable through school life was developed. The effectiveness of the developed program was verified through nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design.The developed program, which went through the intervention feasibility check, was tested for 12 weeks ~ from March 18, 2006 to June 10, 2006 - through extra curricular activities of school. 23 subjects of the test group were selected from obese high school girls of coed high schools in Seoul. Before and after the test, their obesity indexes such as BMI, Fat free mass percentage, waist to hip ratio, muscle mass were measured. Psychological indicators such as dietary self-efficacy, physical activity self-efficacy and self esteem were also checked through questionaires. The number of the control group was 22 and the individual counseling was only conducted for this group based on the test result before and after the test.1. The developed programThis school-based obesity management program for high school girls, based on "School-based obese adolescent management guideline of CCD" applied five steps of behavioral modification (self monitoring for Step 1, stimulus control for Step 2, reinforcement for Step 3, social support for Step 4, recognition of changed oneself for Step 5), and Traffic Light Diet of Epstein and diet analysis with Can-Pro 2.0 for diet program and jump rope and stretching for exercise.2. Evaluation of the program effectivenessThe statistical analysis was conducted after the test with the use of SPSS Windows 12.0 program to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed program.The result of verifying Hypothesis 1, "The obesity index of the test group to which the School-based Obesity Management Program for High School Girls was practiced will significantly increase compared to the control group", is this:BMI ody Mass Index showed statistically significant decrease in the test group (t = 5.861, p = .000), but did not show statistically significant decrease in the control group (t = .438, p = .666). Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in decrease of BMI ody Mass Index (t = 2.725, p = .009) between before and after the test.(t = .438, p = .666). Fat percentage showed statistically significant decrease in the test group in the test group (t = 3.941, p = .000), but showed little change in the control group. Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in decrease of fat percentage (t = 2.319, p = .025) between before and after the test. Fat free mass showed statistically significant increase in the test group (t = -1.997 p = .050), but showed little change in the control group. Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in increase of Fat free mass (t = -2.257, p = .029) between before and after the test. Muscle mass showed statistically significant increase in the test group in the test group (t = -2.091, p = .042), but rather showed decrease in the control group (t = .751, p = .462). Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in increase of muscle mass (t = -2.084, p = .043) between before and after the test. WHR (Waist to hip ratio) was equally improved by 0.01% in both the test and the control group, but neither of them showed statistically significant decrease (t = .272, p = .787) before and after the test.The result of verifying Hypothesis 2, "The psychological index of test group to which the School-based Obesity Management Program for High School Girls was practiced will significantly increase compared to the control group", is this:Dietary self-efficacy showed statistically significant increase in the test group (t = -3.661 , p = .000), but did not show statistically significant increase in the control group (t = -1.142, p = 0.271). Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in increase of dietary self-efficacy (t = 2.427, p = .019) between before and after the test. Physical activity self efficacy showed statistically significant increase in the test group (t = -3.315, p = .000), but did not show statistically significant increase in the control group (t = -.502, p = .631). Thus two groups showed statistically significant difference in increase of physical activity self efficacy (t = -3.201, p = .003) between before and after the test. Self esteem increased .90 points in the test group (t = -.214, p = .842), but rather showed statistically significant decrease in the control group (t = 2.531, p = .023). Thus there was a statistically significant difference in increase of self esteem between two groups (t = -2.209, p = .033) before and after the test.The result of this study, as above, shows that the school-based obesity management program, integrated with diet, exercise and behavioral modification, decreased the obesity index of weight, BMI, fat percentage, muscle mass, and increased the psychological indicators of dietary self-efficacy, physical activity self efficacy and self esteem. Therefore, this study provided the ground that the obesity problem can be controlled for obese high school girls through an integrated school program of diet, exercise and behavioral modification.prohibitio

    A Corpus-based Study of Continuity in Korean Middle School English Textbooks

    No full text
    corecore