71 research outputs found

    Stress and Immunity

    Get PDF
    ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์— ์˜ํ•œ ๋ฉด์—ญ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด ์ผ์ •ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒƒ์€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์˜ ์ •๋„, ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ๋Œ€์‘๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์ค‘์ถ”์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„, ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต, ์ฆ‰ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์ถ”์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ˜ธ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋Š” ์ž„ํŒŒ์กฐ์ง์˜ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ wiring system๊ณผ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„๋‹ค. ์ •์‹ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ธ์ž์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ค‘๊ฐœ์ž๋กœ๋Š” ๋‡Œํ•˜์ˆ˜์ฒด์—์„œ ๋ฐฉ ์ถœ๋˜๋Š” ํŽฉํƒ€์ด๋“œ, ํ˜ธ๋ฅด๋ชฌ ๋ฐ ์ž์œจ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹œ์ƒํ•˜๋ถ€๋Š” ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„, ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ํ”ผ๋“œ๋ฐฑ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ„์—๋Š” ์–‘ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค๊ฐ€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ •์‹ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์–ด ๋–ค ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„, ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ƒ์ฒด๊ท ํ˜• (homeostasis)์ด ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์™€ ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ณ„, ๋‚ด๋ถ„๋น„๊ณ„, ์ž์œจ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ๋‡Œํ™œ๋™์„ ๋™์‹œ์— ์ธก ์ •, ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹คope

    Psychiatric Evaluation of Pain Disorder

    Get PDF
    ํ†ต์ฆ์˜ ๋ฐœ๋ช… ๋ฐ ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ์—๋Š” ๊ธฐ์งˆ์  ์ด์ƒ์€ ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์ •์‹ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์š”์ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค. ํ†ต์ฆ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ด์ฐจ์ ์ธ ๋ฐ˜์‘์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ์•ˆ, ์šฐ์šธ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฐ˜์‘์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š”๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋ฉด ํ†ต์ฆ์ด ์ •์‹ ์žฅ์• ์˜ ์–‘์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ‘œํ˜„๋˜๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ํ†ต์ฆ์€ ์‚ถ์˜ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ํ†ต์ฆ์žฅ์• ์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๋„ ์ •์‹ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์—์„œ ์œ„์•ฝ์„ ๊ธฐ์งˆ์  ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ ์ธ ํ†ต์ฆ์„ ๊ฐ๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์œ„ํ—˜ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ํ†ต์ฆ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์—๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ณต๋™์œผ๋กœ ์ ‘๊ทผํ•˜๋Š” ํ†ตํ•ฉ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ, ์ฆ‰ ์ƒ๋ฌผ์ •์‹ ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์ด ๊ถŒ์žฅ๋œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์˜ ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์  ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€์ •์ด ์ •์‹ ๊ณผ์  ์ ‘๊ทผ์„ ์–ด๋ ต๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํŠน์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๋ฉด๋‹ด๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค.ope

    The Comparison of Stress Responses, Anger Expression and Alexithymia between Chronic Gastritis and Gastric Ulcer Patients

    Get PDF
    The objective of this study was to make a comparison between chronic superficial gastritis and gastric ulcer patients regarding stress responses, anger expression and alexithymia. The subjects included 100 patients with chronic superficial gastritis and 40 patients with gastric ulcer confirmed by gastroscopy. Stress responses were measured by the Stress Response Inventory(SRI) and anxiety, depression, somatization and hostility subscales of the Symptom Checklist-90-revised(SCL-90-R). Anger expression and anger suppression were assessed by the Anger Expression Scale. The level of alexithymia was assessed by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS). Multiple regression analysis showed that the patients with chronic gastritis scored significantly higher on tension subscale and somatization subscale of the SRI, and anxiety subscale of the SCL-90-R than those with gastric ulcer. However, no significant differences were found in the score of anger expression and anger suppression subscales and total score of TAS between the two groups. In chronic gastritis patients, women scored significantly higher on somatization subscale of the SRI than men, whereas in gastric ulcer patients, men scored significantly higher on somatization subscale of the SRI than women. These results suggest that chronic gastritis patients are more likely to have higher level of stress responses and higher susceptibility to stress than gastric ulcer patients. In addition, in chronic gastritis patients, women are more likely to somatize than men, but in gastric ulcer patients, men are more likely to somatize than women. However, there were no differences between the two groups in anger expression, anger suppression and alexithymia.ope

    The Comparison of Anger between Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Healthy Individuals

    Get PDF
    The objective of this study was to make a comparison on anger level between patients with coronary artery diseases and healthy individuals. 233 patients with coronary artery diseases and 215 normal controls were enrolled in this study. The Anger Expression Scale, the anger and aggression subscales of the Stress Response Inventory(SRI) and the hostility subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-revised(SCL-90-R) were used to assess the level of anger. The patients with coronary artery diseases scored significantly higher on the anger-out and anger total subscales of the anger expression scale, the anger and aggression subscales of the SRI than the normal controls. The patients with angina pectoris had significantly higher scores in the anger-out and anger-total subscale than those with myocardial infarction. Male subjects scored significantly higher on the anger-in subscale than females, whereas female subjects scored significantly higher on the anger-out subscale than male subjects. These results suggest that patients with coronary artery diseases are likely to have a higher level of anger or anger expression than normal controls and that there may be difference in anger expression between male and female patients. It is emphasized that anger management is needed to prevent the coronary artery disease patients from aggravating the illness.ope

    Comparison of Alexithymia among Patients with Psychosomatic Disorders, Anxiety Disorders and Depressive Disorders

    No full text
    A comparison was made regarding the degree of alexithymia among patients with psychosomatic disorders, anxiety disorders and depressive disorders. The author examined the degree of alexithymia in three groups : 100 psychosomatic patients(including 47 patients with tension headache), 52 outpatients with anxiety disorden, and 50 outpatients with depressive disorders. Alexithymia was assessed by Alexithymia provoked Response Questionnaires(APRQ) developed as a semi-structured interview form. No significant difference was found in the degree of alexithymia among Patients with Psychosomatic disorders, anxiety disorders, and depressive disorders. On the other hand, patients with tension headache were significantly more alexithymic than patients with anxiety disorders and depressive disorders, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in degree of alexithymia between patients with anxiety disorders and those with depressive disorders. Multiple regression analysis revealed that demographic variables such as set age, education level, and marital status did not make a significant influence on alexithymia scores. These results suggest a greater degree of alexithymia in patients with a specific group of psychosomiatic disorders such as tension headache than in patients with emotional disorders, unlike the previous report that in general, psychosomatic patients are alexithymic. Thus, it is necessary to develop special forms of interview which can induce and encourage expression of emotion as a therapeutic strategy for patients with tension headache.ope

    Cognitive-behavioral Approach to Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases

    No full text
    The author reviewed cognitive-behavioral approach to A type behavior pattern and hypertension which are known to be risk factors for coronary heart diseases. Those cognitive distortions frequently found in persons with A type behavior include all-nothing thinking, selective attention, personalization, and attribution of causality. Cognitive-behavioral techniques were also described, which can be applied to management of each characteristic of A type behavior pattern such as time urgency, perfectionism, achievement striving, low self-esteem, excessive work involvement, hostility, and depression. Cognitive-behavioral intervention for hypertension might help the patients to recognize and monitor anger-engendering conflicts, identify characteristic styles of responding, and experiment with alternative ways of managing conflict and anger. Since different features predominate in different individuals, it is necessary to develop treatment plan on the basis of individual characteristics and problems.ope

    Experience of Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Patients with Chronic Headache

    No full text
    Cognitive-behavioral approach to two cases with chronic headache was presented. Cognitive-behavioral interventions focus on indirectly altering symptom-related physiological activity by changing the way patients cope with headache-eliciting stressors. This treatment focuses directly on the patients' cognitive and behavioral changes. Cognitive-behavioral treatment can be divided into three phases Education, self-monitoring, and problem-solving or coping-skills training. Literature reviews on the follow-up evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness revealed that cognitive-behavioral treatment is effective in the management of chronic headache.ope

    Predominance of anger in depressive disorders compared with anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders

    No full text
    Objective: The object of this study was to make a comparison regarding various dimensions of anger between depressive disorder and anxiety disorder or somatoform disorder. Method: The subjects included 73 patients with depressive disorders, 67 patients with anxiety disorders, 47 patients with somatoform disorders, and 215 healthy controls (diagnoses made according to DSM-IV criteria). Anger measures-the Anger Expression Scale, the hostility subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and the anger and aggression subscales of the Stress Response Inventory-were used to assess the anger levels. The severity of depression, anxiety, phobia, and somatization was assessed using the SCL-90-R. Results: The depressive disorder group showed significantly higher levels of anger on the Stress Response Inventory than the anxiety disorder, somatoform disorder, and control groups (p<.05). The depressive disorder group scored significantly higher on the anger-out and anger-total subscales of the Anger Expression Scale than the somatoform disorder group (p<.05). On the SCL-90-R hostility subscale, the depressive disorder group also scored significantly higher than the anxiety disorder group (p<.05). Within the depressive disorder group, the severity of depression was significantly positively correlated with the anger-out score (r=0.49, p<.001), whereas, in the somatoform and anxiety disorder groups, the severity of depression was significantly positively correlated with the anger-in score (somatoform disorder: r=0.51, p<.001; anxiety disorder: r=0.57, p<.001). Conclusion: These results suggest that depressive disorder patients are more likely to have anger than anxiety disorder or somatoform disorder patients and that depressive disorder may be more relevant to anger expression than somatoform disorder.ope

    Reduced lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin-2 production in anxiety disorders

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of anxiety on cell-mediated immunity. METHOD: The subjects consisted of 31 patients with anxiety disorders and 31 normal controls, who were gender-matched. Cell-mediated immune function was measured by the lymphocyte proliferative response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA), Interleukin-2 (IL-2) production, and natural killer cell activity (NKA). The extent of anxiety was assessed by the Hamilton rating scale for anxiety and the anxiety subscale of symptom checklist-90 revised (SCL-90-R). RESULTS: The patients with anxiety disorders were significantly lower than the normal controls in lymphocyte proliferative response to PHA and IL-2 production. However, there was no significant difference in NKA between the two groups. Also, no significant correlation was found between the duration of illness or the degree of anxiety and each immune measure in patients with anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a reduced cell-mediated immune function in patients with anxiety disorders, compared with normal controls. These findings also imply that a variety of immune measures should be assessed at the same time in this kind of psychoneuroimmunology research. This would help elucidate the relationship between anxiety and immune function, which has been unclear in most previous research using a single immune measure.restrictio

    Development of the Cognitive Stress Response Scale

    No full text
    Objective : The purpose of this study was to develop a cognitive stress response scale (CSRS) . Methods First, a preliminary survey was conducted for 109 healthy aduhs to obtain 29 response items. Second, a preliminary questionnaire was completed by 215 healthy subjects. Third, a comparison was made regarding cognitive responses among 73 patients with depressive disorders and 215 healthy subjects. Results : Factor analysis yielded 3 subscales : extreme-negative thought, aggressive-hostile thought, and self-depreciative thought. Reliability was computed by administering the CSRS to 62 healthy subjects during a 2-week interval. Test-retest reliaยญbility for 3 subscales and the total score were significantly high, ranging between. 87-.95. Internal consistency was computed, and Cronbachยดs a for 3 subscales ranged between. 82-.91, and .94 for the total score. Convergent validity was computed by correlating the 3 subscales and the total score with the total score of the global assessment of recent stress (GARS) scale, the perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ), and the symptom checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R). The correlations were all at signifiยญcant levels. The depressive disorder group was significantly higher than control group in all the subscale scores and total scores of the CSRS. In total scores of the CSRS, female subjects were significantly higher than males. Conclusion : These results indicate that the CSRS is highly reliable and valid, and that it can be utilized as an effective measure for research related to cognitive assessment.ope
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore