Comparison of a covered metallic ureteral stent and a double-J stent for malignant ureteral obstruction in advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To compare the patency and safety of covered metallic stents (CMS) and the double-J stent (DJS) for treating malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, the medical records of 61 patients (84 ureters; CMS, 39 patients, 54 ureters; DJS, 22 patients, 30 ureters) with MUO caused by AGC were reviewed retrospectively. The KaplaneMeier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate differences of primary or assisted primary patency between groups. Cox regression was conducted separately for early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) primary patency. RESULTS: Technical success of CMS placement was 100% (54/54) and 96.8% (29/30) for DJS (p¼0.357). The cumulative stent patency rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 77%, 74%, 70%, and 70%, in the CMS group and 72%, 60%, 53%, and 26%, in the DJS group. Apart from the period within 7 days (p¼0.784), primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group when compared to the DJS group over the entire follow-up period (p¼0.034). Assisted primary patency was consistently higher in the CMS group than in the DJS group over the entire followup period (p¼0.001). The CMS group was more likely to have complications than the DJS group (48.1% versus 16.7%, p¼0.004). Complications were minor, self-limiting events such as haematuria/ haematoma

Comparison of different techniques for the management of venous steno-occlusive lesions during placement of peripherally inserted central catheter

The purpose of this study is to investigate strategies for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in patients with venous steno-occlusive lesion (VSOL). We performed a retrospective cohort study in adults with central or peripheral VSOL who underwent PICC placement procedures from January 2015 to December 2018. Four different strategies [selecting alternative pathway/over the wire (SAP/OTW), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), re-puncture in ipsilateral arm (RIA), and catheter placement in the contralateral arm (CICA)] were analyzed and we compared the clinical outcomes by strategy and compared the strategy between central and peripheral VSOLs. During 4 years, 258 PICC procedures performed in patients with VSOLs, 100 PICC were included in the analysis. The overall technical success rate of initial attempt with SAP/OTW was 32.2%. As a second-line technique, PTA was most frequently used in both central (100%) and peripheral (68.2%) VSOL groups. The clinical success rates within 2 months of SAP/OTW, PTA, RIA, CICA were 55.2%, 43.2%, 14.3%, and 33.3%, respectively (P=0.24). In conclusion, when the SAP/OTW failed, the PTA can be preferred as a second-line technique for both central and peripheral VSOLs. When guidewire passage fails, the operator could adopt the RIA or CICA technique as an alternative method