4 research outputs found

    Justice in Paul Ricoeur's Philosophy

    Get PDF
    According to Paul Ricoeur, the question “What is the just?” is interrelated with the question “Why be just?” which is in turn connected to “Who am I?” Ricoeur elaborates his conception of justice on the basis of his “little ethics,” which is founded on his conception of narrative identity. According to him, justice is basically rooted in the dialectic tension between alterity and identity, which constitutes the self. His analysis of selfhood, from the most elementary level in semantic analysis onwards, shows that features of justice are reflected in the ontological-existential structure. It can be said that these features as a whole are characteristic of human existence, which is prone to perversion by evil. His analysis of the narrative provide the framework for a further analysis of the just in political, juridical and criminological fields.

    Disability from Philosophical Perspective

    Get PDF
    “Disability” is a term that can be very disabling to our comprehension because of its illusory commonness. Embedded in conflicting philosophical frameworks with different policy implications, it is such an intersection of the philosophical and the practical. Most influential among these frameworks are the medical model and the social model of disability. Despite its declared animosity toward the former, the latter shares its Cartesian presuppositions and therefore leads to no less oppression of the disabled. This is exposed in the work of deconstruction by later postmodern/poststructuralist scholars in disability studies. To liberate the disabled without oppressive side effects, a Foucauldian framework is thus offered as an alternative. The case study of “Theresa Chan”, a multiple-disabled woman as portrayed in the award-winning film, “Be With Me”, is herein used to facilitate the presentation of the research results

    āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ: āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļē(Experience of Spirituality in Teachers: A Phenomenological Study)

    No full text
    This research had two main objectives: 1) to describe and narrate the experience of spirituality inteachers who received awards from the ideological and spiritual teacher project and 2) tounderstand the process of development of spirituality among teachers who were awarded. Thiswas a phenomenology study using the Empirical existential-phenomenology of Amedeo Giorgi.Key Informants in this study were 3 teachers who are in service teachers and received awards bythe Office of Basic Education for being ideological and spiritual teacher. The method used waspurposive sampling. In addition, 15 secondary key informants were selected for interviewing witha view to support information.The study results showed core structure, which is the essence of the experience of teacherspirituality included of 3 stages: 1) The development of teacher spirituality is related to thedevelopment of five themes, including a model of teacher spirituality, incentives to enter teaching,experience in coping and facing difficult conditions in life, relationship between teacher and pupil,and basic psychological features. 2) Being a teacher who has spirituality is an emerging of themental state and behavior of spirituality within the person himself. The meaning of “Being aspiritual teacher” includes awareness of being a teacher and practice as a teacher with the goal ofworking for children, and treat them with love and compassion. 3) The sustaining of teacherspirituality is founded to be composed of happiness and pride, relationship between teacher andpupil, and faith on individuals who believe in the value of the homeland.Keywords: spiritual teachers’ experience, teacher spiritual, the spiritual development process,phenomenologyāļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļļāļ”āļĄāļļāđˆāļ‡āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļĢāļĢāļ“āļ™āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļĒāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ„āļĢāļđāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§āļąāļĨāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļ­āļļāļ”āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļĢāļđ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļšāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ„āļĢāļđāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§āļąāļĨāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļ­āļļāļ”āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļĢāļđāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđāļ™āļ§āļ„āļīāļ”āļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļē āđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒāļļāļāļ•āđŒāđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡ āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ•āļēāļĄāđāļšāļšāļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļē-āļ­āļąāļ•āļ–āļīāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļˆāļąāļāļĐāđŒāļ•āļēāļĄāđāļ™āļ§āļ‚āļ­āļ‡ Amedeo Giorgi āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļŦāļĨāļąāļ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĢāļēāļŠāļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĢāļđāđƒāļ™āļŠāļēāļĒāļŠāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§āļąāļĨāđƒāļ™āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļēāļĄāļĢāļ­āļĒāđ€āļāļĩāļĒāļĢāļ•āļīāļĒāļĻāļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļ­āļļāļ”āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™ 3 āļ„āļ™ āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļĢāļ­āļ‡ āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™ 15 āļ„āļ™ āļœāļĨāļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āđ‚āļ„āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļąāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđāļāđˆāļ™āļŠāļēāļĢāļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļš 3 āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ 1) āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ­āļēāļŠāļĩāļžāļ„āļĢāļđāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļœāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļžāļšāļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļ§āđˆāļē āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ5 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ āļāļēāļĢāļĄāļĩāļ•āļąāļ§āđāļšāļšāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“ āđāļĢāļ‡āļˆāļđāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļŠāļđāđˆāļ­āļēāļŠāļĩāļžāļ„āļĢāļđ āļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļšāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļēāļāļĨāļģāļšāļēāļ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāļāļąāļšāļĻāļīāļĐāļĒāđŒ āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļļāļ“āļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļē 2) āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨ āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ “āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ” āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ™āļąāļāļĢāļđāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ•āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļšāļ™āļ§āļīāļ–āļĩāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļĄāļĩāđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĄāļ•āļ•āļē 3) āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļ‡āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļ„āļ‡āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđƒāļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļœāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļžāļšāļĄāļđāļĨāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ„āļ‡āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ„āđ‰āļģāļˆāļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ 4 āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™ āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļļāļ‚ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāļ„āļ āļđāļĄāļīāđƒāļˆ āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāļāļąāļšāļĻāļīāļĐāļĒāđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļĻāļĢāļąāļ—āļ˜āļēāļ•āđˆāļ­āļšāļļāļ„āļ„āļĨāļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĢāļ‡āļ„āļļāļ“āļ„āđˆāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđāļœāđˆāļ™āļ”āļīāļ™āļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“ āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“āļ„āļĢāļđ āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ„āļĢāļđ āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđ€āļŠāļīāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒ
    corecore