[Al-milal wa-l-niḥal. Alemán]

Índic

Título: Religionspartheien und Philosophenschulen

Índic

Título: Al-milal wa-l-niḥal

5 t. en 2 v

Kitāb Al-faṣl fī-al-milal wa-al-ahwāʾ wa-al-niḥal

5 t. en 2 v

MUḤAMMAD IBN ʿABD AL-KARĪM AL-ŠAHRASTĀNĪ. Kitāb al-milal wal-niḥal.

Milal (Kitāb al-) wal-niḥalالملل (كتاب) و النحلNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.Inc. (f. 2 v) : مقالات أهل العالم من أرباب الديانات والملل وأهل الأهواء والنحل الحمد لله حمد الشاكرين بجميع محامده ... لما وفقني الله تعٓ لمطالعة Exp. (f. 181 v) : ويدخل في عمارة (sic) جنده وحربه (sic) والحمد لله Copie anonyme, achevée le 5 ǧumādā II 967 de l'hégire (f. 181 v).Cachet et marque effacée (f. 1) ; vers en persan (f. 1 v-2) et cachet au nom de Muḥammad Amīn, marque de possession au nom de Mudḥāzāde cadi de la ville d'Edirne, puis de Muḥammad Amīn datée de 1183/1768 (f. 2) ; autres marques et essais de plume (f. 182 v)

Fragments d'ouvrages médicaux et philosophiques .

Contient : [Fragment de al-Muhaḏḏab fī al-kuḥl al-muğarrab de ʿAlī ibn Abī al-Ḥazm Ibn al-Nafīs] ; قطعة من المهذّب في الكحل المجرّب لعلي بن أبي الحزم بن النفيس ; [Fragment de al-Milal wa-al-niḥal de Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Šahrastānī] ; [قطعة من الملل والنحل لمحمد بن عبد الكريم الشهرستاني] ; [Fragment du Kitāb al-ḥudūd de Ibn Sīnā suivi d'un fragment d'un dictionnaire médical ] ; قطعة من كتاب الحدود لابن سينا ويليه قطعة من قاموس في الطب ; [Fragment du Mufīd al-ʿulūm wa-mubīd al-humūm par Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad Ibn al-Ḥaššā'] ; قطهة من مفيد العلوم ومبيد الهموم لأحمد بن محمد بن الخشّاءNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document de substitution.Mention d'un retour de pélerinage le 30 rabīʿ I 1101 h. / 11 janvier 1690 (f. 1). Marques de possession de Sulaymān Ḫawāğa, du Dīwān de Tunis, en 1094 h. / 1682-83 et Aḥmad al-Yūsufī, datée de 1215 h. / 1800-1900 (f. 6r). Deux lettres hébraiques (פמ) (f. 43v), 3 lignes en arabe en caractères hébraïques : transmis au Rabb Mūsā ibn rabb Yūsuf al-Mutaṭabbib dans une écriture d'Afrique du Nord, XVe-XVIe s. (f. 44r). Marque au nom de ʿAbd Allāh in al-Ḥāğğ Ḥasan (f. 44r), inscritpion en hébreu ? (f. 108

Was Julian Right? A Re-Evaluation of Augustine’s and Mani’s Doctrines of Sexual Concupiscence and the Transmission of Sin: Part 1

The article focuses on the question: Was Julian of Eclanum (c. 380–454) right in accusing Augustine (354–430) of still being a Manichaean, based on his view of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of (original) sin? In order to find an answer to this (still hotly debated) question, a sketch of Augustine’s acquaintance with Manichaeism is first provided. Thereafter follows the (first ever) overview of the Manichaean doctrines of the origin of sexual concupiscence, its distinctive features, and its role in the transmission of sin. The third part of the article focuses on the essentials of Augustine’s views of sexual concupiscence and the transmission of original sin, in particular as they were expounded (and further developed) in his controversy with the ‘Pelagian’ bishop, Julian of Eclanum. It is concluded that, in particular, Augustine’s stress on the ‘random motion’ (motus inordinatus) as typical of the sinfulness of sexual concupiscence, is strikingly similar to Manichaean views on the subject. In this respect, then, Julian seems to be right. Finally, some preliminary remarks are made on early Jewish and Jewish-Christian views of sexual concupiscence and (original) sin which may have influenced not only Mani and his followers, but also Augustine and his precursors in the tradition of Roman North Africa. The current article is the first in a series of two essays on the topic.The National Research Foundation (NRF) in South Africa.https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rech20hj2019Church History and Church Polic