Evaluation of imaging parameters of ultrasound scanners : baseline for future testing

Background: Regular quality control is required in Poland only for those methods of medical imaging which involve the use of ionizing radiation but not for ultrasonography. It is known that the quality of ultrasound images may be affected by the wearing down or malfunctioning of equipment. Material/Methods: An evaluation of image quality was carried out for 22 ultrasound scanners equipped with 46 transducers. The CIRS Phantom model 040GSE was used. A set of tests was established which could be carried out with the phantom, including: depth of penetration, dead zone, distance measurement accuracy, resolution, uniformity, and visibility of structures. Results: While the dead zone was 0 mm for 89% of transducers, it was 3 mm for the oldest transducer. The distances measured agreed with the actual distances by 1 mm or less in most cases, with the largest difference of 2.6 mm. The resolution in the axial direction for linear transducers did not exceed 1 mm, but it reached even 5 mm for some of the convex and sector transducers, especially at higher depths and in the lateral direction. For 29% of transducers, some distortions of anechoic structures were observed. Artifacts were detected for several transducers. Conclusions: The results will serve as a baseline for future testing. Several cases of suboptimal image quality were identified along with differences in performance between similar transducers. The results could be used to decide on the applicability of a given scanner or transducer for a particular kind of examination

Evaluation of doses and image quality in mammography with screen-film, CR, and DR detectors : application of the ACR phantom

BACKGROUND: Different methods of image quality evaluation are routinely used for analogue and digital mammography systems in Poland. In the present study, image quality for several screen-film (SF), computed radiography (CR), and fully digital (DR) mammography systems was compared directly with the use of the ACR mammography accreditation phantom. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Image quality and mean glandular doses were measured and compared for 47 mammography systems in the Mazovia Voivodeship in Poland, including 26 SF systems, 12 CR systems, and 9 DR systems. The mean glandular dose for the breast simulated by 4.5 cm of PMMA was calculated with methods described in the "European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis". Visibility of the structures in the image (fibers, microcalcifications, and masses) was evaluated with the mammographic accreditation ACR phantom. RESULTS: Image quality for DR systems was significantly higher than for SF and CR systems. Several SF systems failed to pass the image quality tests because of artifacts. The doses were within acceptable limits for all of the systems, but the doses for the CR systems were significantly higher than for the SF and DR systems. CONCLUSIONS: The best image quality, at a reasonably low dose, was observed for the DR systems. The CR systems are capable of obtaining the same image quality as the SF systems, but only at a significantly higher dose. The ACR phantom can be routinely used to evaluate image quality for all types of mammographic systems

Evaluation of the quality of mammographic screening examinations performed in the Mazovian Province in 2007-2009

Background: There is a significant risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis associated with x-ray mammography. Therefore, the dose received by a woman during mammography should be as low as possible, with an optimal quality of the image. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the quality of mammographic examinations within three consecutive years of the screening program in the Mazovian Province. Material/Methods: The material for this study consisted of protocols from 114 mammography facilities, developed by physicists from the Mazovian Coordinating Centre in 2007-2009. According to the method published by Dance, individual doses (data from 2007 and 2008) and the value of the absorbed dose in a routine exposure of a standard PMMA phantom with a thickness of 4.5 cm were calculated. Moreover, optical densities of the phantom image (data from the years 2007 to 2009) were measured. Results: The weighted average value of the calculated individual doses in 2008 was lower by 15%, as compared to the value from 2007. Reduction of individual doses is also reflected in the reduced phantom dose in routine exposures performed in consecutive years. In 2007, 2008, and 2009, the phantom dose in routine exposures did not exceed 2.5 mGy in 54%, 70% and 75% mammography facilities (respectively) and the optical density ranged from 1.3 to 1.8. Conclusions: Results from consecutive years showed an evident tendency for decreasing radiation risk, with increasing image quality

The role of SSDL in quality assurance in radiotherapy

This paper describes the role of the Polish Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) in quality assurance in radiotherapy by means of providing calibration of ionisation chambers, TLD postal dosimetry audits and end-to-end audits for radiation therapy. A historical review of the methods and results are presented. The influence of the SSDL in Warsaw on radiation protection of patients in Poland is discussed. The International Atomic Energy Agency together with World Health Organisation (IAEA/WHO), through its network of SSDLs around the world, propagates newly developed methods for calibration and auditing. Suitable high quality equipment was provided by the IAEA, as well as special materials and technical support to the SSDL in Warsaw. The activity of the SSDL and the services provided for Polish radiotherapy centres have resulted in a reduction of discrepancies between planned doses and doses delivered to patients. The newly tested IAEA methods of end-to-end on-site dosimetry audits allow for monitoring and improving the quality of IMRT in Poland. The traceability of standards used for the calibration of therapy level dosimeters from Polish radiotherapy centres is assured by the IAEA dosimetry laboratory. The consistency of methods performed in the Polish SSDL with the ISO:17025 norm is supervised by the Polish Centre for Accreditation – a member of International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), for calibration and testing. Due to the rapid technological development of radiotherapy, special attention has to be paid to newly developed methods for dosimetry auditing and institutions which provide services for assuring radiation safety of patients