The use of clonidine in elderly patients with delirium; pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic responses

Background The Oslo Study of Clonidine in Elderly Patients with Delirium (LUCID) is an RCT investigating the effect of clonidine in medical patients > 65 years with delirium. To assess the dosage regimen and safety measures of this study protocol, we measured the plasma concentrations and hemodynamic effects of clonidine in the first 20 patients. Methods Patients were randomised to clonidine (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). The treatment group was given a loading dose (75μg every 3rd hour up to a maximum of 4 doses) to reach steady state, and further 75μg twice daily until delirium free for 2 days, discharge or a maximum of 7 days. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured just before every dose. If the systolic BP was < 100 mmHg or HR < 50 beats per minute the next dose was omitted. Plasma concentrations of clonidine were measured 3 h after each drug intake on day 1, just before intake (day 2 and at steady state day 4–6) and 3 h after intake at steady state (Cmax). Our estimated pre-specified plasma concentration target range was 0.3–0.7μg/L. Results 3 h after the first dose of 75μg clonidine, plasma concentration levels rose to median 0.35 (range 0.24–0.40)μg/L. Median trough concentration (C0) at day 2 was 0.70 (0.47–0.96)μg/L. At steady state, median C0 was 0.47 (0.36–0.76)μg/L, rising to Cmax 0.74 (0.56–0.95)μg/L 3 h post dose. A significant haemodynamic change from baseline was only found at a few time-points during the loading doses within the clonidine group. There was however extensive individual BP and HR variation in both the clonidine and placebo groups, and when comparing the change scores (delta values) between the clonidine and the placebo groups, there were no significant differences. Conclusions The plasma concentration of clonidine was at the higher end of the estimated therapeutic range. Hemodynamic changes during clonidine treatment were as expected, with trends towards lower blood pressure and heart rate in patients treated with clonidine, but with dose adjustments based on SBP this protocol appears safe. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01956604, 09.25.2013. EudraCT Number: 2013–000815-26, 03.18.2013. Enrolment of first participant: 04.24.2014

The Oslo Study of Clonidine in Elderly Patients with Delirium; LUCID: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Objectives The aim of this double‐blinded randomised placebo‐controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of clonidine for delirium in medical inpatients greater than 65 years. Methods Acutely admitted medical patients greater than 65 years with delirium or subsyndromal delirium were eligible for inclusion. Included patients were given a loading dose of either placebo or clonidine; 75 μg every third hour up to a maximum of four doses to reach steady state and further 75 μg twice daily until delirium free for 2 days, discharge or a maximum of 7 days of treatment. The primary endpoint was the trajectory of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) for the 7 days of treatment. Presence of delirium according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5) criteria and severity measured by MDAS were assessed daily until discharge or a maximum of 7 days after end of treatment. Results Because of slower enrolment than anticipated, the study was halted early. Ten patients in each group were studied. The low recruitment rate was mainly due to the presence of multiple patient exclusion criteria for patient safety. There was no significant difference between the treatment group in the primary endpoint comparing the trajectory of MDAS for the 7 days of treatment using mixed linear models with log transformation, (P = .60). The treatment group did not have increased adverse effects. Conclusions No effect of clonidine for delirium was found, although the study was under powered. Further studies in less frail populations are now required

The Oslo Study of Clonidine in Elderly Patients with Delirium; LUCID: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Objectives The aim of this double‐blinded randomised placebo‐controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of clonidine for delirium in medical inpatients greater than 65 years. Methods Acutely admitted medical patients greater than 65 years with delirium or subsyndromal delirium were eligible for inclusion. Included patients were given a loading dose of either placebo or clonidine; 75 μg every third hour up to a maximum of four doses to reach steady state and further 75 μg twice daily until delirium free for 2 days, discharge or a maximum of 7 days of treatment. The primary endpoint was the trajectory of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) for the 7 days of treatment. Presence of delirium according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5) criteria and severity measured by MDAS were assessed daily until discharge or a maximum of 7 days after end of treatment. Results Because of slower enrolment than anticipated, the study was halted early. Ten patients in each group were studied. The low recruitment rate was mainly due to the presence of multiple patient exclusion criteria for patient safety. There was no significant difference between the treatment group in the primary endpoint comparing the trajectory of MDAS for the 7 days of treatment using mixed linear models with log transformation, (P = .60). The treatment group did not have increased adverse effects. Conclusions No effect of clonidine for delirium was found, although the study was under powered. Further studies in less frail populations are now required

The use of clonidine in elderly patients with delirium; pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic responses

Background The Oslo Study of Clonidine in Elderly Patients with Delirium (LUCID) is an RCT investigating the effect of clonidine in medical patients > 65 years with delirium. To assess the dosage regimen and safety measures of this study protocol, we measured the plasma concentrations and hemodynamic effects of clonidine in the first 20 patients. Methods Patients were randomised to clonidine (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). The treatment group was given a loading dose (75μg every 3rd hour up to a maximum of 4 doses) to reach steady state, and further 75μg twice daily until delirium free for 2 days, discharge or a maximum of 7 days. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured just before every dose. If the systolic BP was < 100 mmHg or HR < 50 beats per minute the next dose was omitted. Plasma concentrations of clonidine were measured 3 h after each drug intake on day 1, just before intake (day 2 and at steady state day 4–6) and 3 h after intake at steady state (Cmax). Our estimated pre-specified plasma concentration target range was 0.3–0.7μg/L. Results 3 h after the first dose of 75μg clonidine, plasma concentration levels rose to median 0.35 (range 0.24–0.40)μg/L. Median trough concentration (C0) at day 2 was 0.70 (0.47–0.96)μg/L. At steady state, median C0 was 0.47 (0.36–0.76)μg/L, rising to Cmax 0.74 (0.56–0.95)μg/L 3 h post dose. A significant haemodynamic change from baseline was only found at a few time-points during the loading doses within the clonidine group. There was however extensive individual BP and HR variation in both the clonidine and placebo groups, and when comparing the change scores (delta values) between the clonidine and the placebo groups, there were no significant differences. Conclusions The plasma concentration of clonidine was at the higher end of the estimated therapeutic range. Hemodynamic changes during clonidine treatment were as expected, with trends towards lower blood pressure and heart rate in patients treated with clonidine, but with dose adjustments based on SBP this protocol appears safe

Ventilasjonsstøtte for hypoksemiske intensivpasienter med covid-19

BAKGRUNN Covid-19-pneumoni kan gi alvorlig hypoksemisk respirasjonssvikt som krever intensivmedisinsk behandling. Vi ønsket å beskrive covid-19-intensivpasienter som ble behandlet med og uten invasiv ventilasjonsstøtte. MATERIALE OG METODE Materialet er hentet fra lokalt kvalitetsregister og består av data om pasienter med covid-19 innlagt på intensivavdelingen ved Oslo universitetssykehus, Ullevål i perioden 5.3–28.5.2020. Pasientene ble kategorisert i tre grupper basert på respirasjonssviktbehandlingen (oksygen alene, tillegg av ikke-invasiv ventilasjonsstøtte (NIV) og intubasjon/respirator) og beskrevet med deskriptiv statistikk. RESULTATER Av 165 innlagte covid-19-pasienter ble 26 (16 %) behandlet ved vår intensivavdeling. Fire av disse hadde behandlingsbegrensninger og ble ekskludert. De 22 pasientene inkludert i denne studien hadde gjennomsnittsalder 56 år (spredning 25–78 år), 17 (77 %) var menn. Elleve pasienter fikk respiratorbehandling, syv oksygen på maske og fire tillegg av ikke-invasiv ventilasjonsstøtte. I respiratorgruppen var to døde per 28.5.2020, resten var skrevet ut av intensivavdelingen i live, hvorav én fortsatt lå på sengepost. Alle pasienter behandlet med oksygen og ikke-invasiv ventilasjonsstøtte var i live og utskrevet fra sykehus. FORTOLKNING Mange pasienter med covid-19-respirasjonssvikt og behov for intensivbehandling kan klare seg med økt oksygentilbud og ikke-invasiv ventilasjonsstøtte, men behov for intubasjon må fortløpende vurderes. Over 90 % av aktivt behandlede intensivpasienter overlevde