49 research outputs found

    Cyrtophora citricola (Araneae: Araneidae: Cyrtophorinae), a first record for Turkey

    Get PDF
    We recorded the tent-web spider Cyrtophora citricola (Forsskål, 1775) (Araneidae: Cyrtophorinae) from Turkey for the first time at two sites. Body measurements and a brief description of the female are presented, as well as information on the sites (olive and orange orchards, shrubs) and the accompanying spider fauna

    A new species of harpactea (araneae, dysderidae) from aegean region of Turkey

    Get PDF
    A new species of the spider genus Harpactea Bristowe, 1939 is described from the Aegean region of Turkey - Harpactea erseni sp. n. (males only). Detailed morphological description and illustrations of the new species are provided. The relationships of the new species are discussed

    SPIDERS (ARANEI) NEW TO THE FAUNA OF TURKEY. 8. NEW RECORDS OF HAHNIIDAE AND DICTYNIDAE

    Get PDF
    New records are presented for a number of species collected from central and north-western parts of Turkey. Five species and one genus represent new records for Turkey (3 species in Hahniidae and 2species and one genus in Dictynidae): Hahnia candida Simon, 1875, H. helveola Simon, 1875, H.nava (Blackwall, 1841), Scotolathys simplex Simon, 1884 and Nigma puella (Simon, 1870). Notes on distribution and habitat preferences of the species are provided and briefly discussed

    FIGURES 67–69 in New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 67–69. Harpactea yanardagi sp. nov. 67-69. Bulb (left), nearly retrolateral view. Abbrevation: E, embolus; T, tegulum.Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir Boğaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on page 405, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    Dasumia antalyaensis Kunt & Özkütük 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Dasumia antalyaensis</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 1–4</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> <b>Holotype</b> 1 ♀ (ETZM), Finike Dist., Alacadağ Vill., road of Eroğlu tomb (36°26’12”N 30° 2’22”E), 1810 m, 18 Sept 2014, leg. E.A. Yağmur.</p> <p> <b>Etymology:</b> The specific name refers to the area of distribution.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> <i>D. antalyaensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles <i>D. cephalleniae</i> Brignoli, 1976 and <i>D. nativitatis</i> Brignoli, 1974 by the strongly sclerotised flat spermathecae, the prominent anterior margins of the anterior arch and the large posterior diverticulum (Figs 3–4). However, the anterior arc of <i>D. antalyaensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> differ from <i>D. cephalleniae</i> and <i>D. nativitatis</i>. Namely, in <i>D. antalyaensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> the tip of the spermatheca is narrow and slightly concave, while in <i>D. cephalleniae</i> and <i>D. nativitatis</i> it is broad and straight. Besides these: <i>D. antalyaensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> has numerous spines on femora III, <i>D. cephalleniae</i> has no spines, <i>D. nativitatis</i> has only three spines (Fig. 1). There is also a significant variation in body size between the species. Comparing the females of the three species, <i>D. antalyaensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is bigger than both <i>D. nativitatis</i> and it is larger than <i>D. cephalleniae</i> in terms of body length.</p> <p> <b>Description: Measurements: [Holotype ♀]</b> TL 6.50; AL 3.75; CL 2.75; CW 2.15; Clh 0.07; AEd 0.14; iAE 0.06; PLEd 0.13; PMEd 0.12; ChF 0.38; ChG 0.38; ChL 1.15.</p> <p>Large sized harpacteine spiders. Carapace reddish dark brown; fovea longitudinal, black and distinct (Fig. 1). There is a tonal difference between cephalic and thoracic regions. AE, PLE and PME arranged annulary, all of them close to each other. Sternum and gnatocoxae reddish brown. Labium and chelicerae reddish. Cheliceral groove with four teeth. Promarginal teeth strongly developed at the base of the cheliceral groove, of the same size and arranged in a row. The first of the retromarginal teeth is aligned with the second of the promarginal teeth. The retromarginal teeth are smaller than the promarginal teeth, but they are also the same size and approximately two tooth lengths apart (Fig. 2).</p> <p>Abdomen cream colored, covered with short blackish setae (Fig. 1). Legs brown. There are tonal differences at the distal and proximal parts of the leg segments. Leg formula: IV, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements are given in Tables 1 and 2.</p> <p> <b>Vulva (Figs 3–4):</b> Tip of spermathecal keel narrow, patelliform, very slightly concave. Spermatheca straight. Anterior margin of the anterior arch strongly concave. Edges are wide, convex, membranous, less sclerotized than the middle and oriented towards the anterior. The transversal bar is wider than the anterior arc. Central part strongly sclerotised, membranous towards the margins, with the tips curved inwards. Posterior diverticulum membranous, circular, almost the same width as the width of the anterior arc.</p>Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir BoÄŸaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on pages 381-382, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    Dasumia capacii Kunt & Özkütük 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Dasumia capacii</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 5–13</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> <b>Holotype</b> 1 ♂ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Çaltıcak Area (36°47’6”N 30°34’9”E), asl c. 20 m, 9 Mar 2016, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt. <b>Paratypes</b> 1 ♂, 2 ♀ (ETZM), same data as holotype — 1 ♂ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Between Sarısu-Beldibi (36°47’6”N 30°34’9”E), asl c. 18 m, 25 Feb 2015, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 1 ♀, 2 ♂ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Çıralı Road (36°25’14”N 30°27’19”E), asl c. 42 m, 04 Nov 2016 ↔ 27 Apr 2017, leg. E.A. Yağmur — 1 ♂ (ETZM), Konyaaltı Dist., Küçük Çaltıcak Area (36°47’37”N 30°34’23”E), asl c. 19 m, 27 Apr 2017, leg. E.A. Yağmur — 4 ♀, 2J (ETZM), Kumluca Dist., Çıralı Town (36°25’14”N 30°27’20”E), asl c. 54 m, 11 Mar 2016, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 1 ♂ (ETZM), Kumluca Dist., Yazır Vill., ancient city of Olympos (36°23’17”N 30°27’33”E), asl c. 40 m, 06 Nov 2016 ↔ 27 Apr 2017, leg. E.A. Yağmur.</p> <p> <b>Etymology:</b> The new species is named in honor of the Turkish medical doctor, naturalist, calligraphist and philosopher, Kazım Çapacı, mentor and friend of the first author.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> <i>D. capacii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles <i>D. gasparoi</i> Kunt, Özkütük & Elverici, 2011, endemic to Turkey, and <i>D. crassipalpis</i> (Simon, 1882), from the Middle East, but differs from these species by the bulb morphology. In <i>D. capacii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> and <i>D. crassipalpis</i>, the length of the tegulum and distal division are almost equal, whereas in <i>D. gasparoi</i> the length of the distal division is longer than the tegulum. Moreover, the tip of the embolus is directed towards apophysis b in <i>D. gasparoi</i> and <i>D. crassipalpis</i>, whereas in <i>D. capacii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> it is directed towards apophysis a (Figs 8–10).</p> <p> The vulva of <i>D. capacii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles that of <i>D. gasparoi</i> by the curved margins of the anterior margin of the anterior arcs, and <i>D. gasparoi</i> and <i>D. mariandyna</i> Brignoli, 1979 by the enlarged basal spermathecae (Figs 11– 13). It differs from <i>D. gasparoi</i> by the spermatheca not as triangular, and from <i>D. mariandyna</i> by the less prominent roundishstructures on the sides of the spermatheca. In additon the the transversal bar is more prominently developed in <i>D. capacii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> than in other species (Figs 11–12).</p> <p> <b>Description: Measurements: [Holotype ♂ / Paratypes ♀]</b> TL 5.50/3.65–7.10; AL 3.00/3.55–3.80; CL 2.50/3.10–3.30; CW 1.95/2.40–2.45; Clh 0.05/0.06–0.06; AEd 0.12/0.16–0.18; iAE 0.04/0.05–0.05; PLEd 0.12/0.14–0.14; PMEd 0.11/0.13–0.13; ChF 0.50/0.50–0.55; ChG 0.35/0.45–0.50; ChL 1.10/1.00–1.40.</p> <p> <b>[Paratype ♂]</b> TL 7.30; AL 3.90; CL 3.40; CW 2.65; Clh 0.06; AEd 0.18; iAE 0.05; PLEd 0.14; PMEd 0.14; ChF 0.55; ChG 0.50; ChL 1.50.</p> <p>Large sized harpacteine spiders. There are no differences between males and females in general morphology. Carapace brown; fovea longitudinal, distinct. Thoracic region of the carapace about 2½ times of wider than eye region (Fig. 5). AE, PLE and PME arranged annularly. Sternum and gnatocoxae brown. The margins of the sternum with long blackish setae, darker than the general. Gnatocoxae ventrally with short blunt blackish setae. Labium and chelicerae darker in color (Fig. 6). Cheliceral groove with four teeth. The teeth in the promarginal are in a row, strongly developed. Larger than the one following it at the base of the cheliceral groove. The first of the retromarginal teeth is smaller than the second. The distance between the two is almost four times the width of the base of the first tooth (Fig. 7). Abdomen grayish, covered with grayish short setae. Legs yellowish brown. Distal and proximal parts of leg segments dark brown (Fig. 5). Leg formula: IV, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements are given in Tables 3 and 4.</p> <p> <b>Palp (Figs 8–10):</b> Palpal tarsus is almost the same length as the tibia. Tegulum cylindrical, longer than wide. Anterior margin flat, posterior margin concave.Anterior and distal margins almost perpendicular to each other. Distal appendages strongly sclerotized. Embolus black, massive; originating from a broad, triangular base posteriorly and then strongly curving dorsally and looking like a hook (Figs 8–10). The conductor is large. It consists of two different apophyses that are almost fused together. There is a strong beak-shaped apophysis just ventrally to the embolar base (<i> AP a</i> ). Another apophysis (<i> AP b</i> ) is shaped as a large sclerotized wing in the direction opposite to embolus and <i>AP</i></p> <p> <i>a</i></p> <p>(Fig. 9).</p> <p> <b>Vulva (Figs 11–13):</b> Anterior arc completely sclerotized (Figs 11–12). Spermatheca gladius-shaped, but with a blunt tip. Spermatechal keel is less sclerotized than other parts of the spermateca, and mostly membranous except for the midline. The central part of the spermatheca is almost twice as wide as the spermathecal keel. Roundish structures are fused with the anterior margin of the anterior arc (Fig. 11). There are membranous layers between the anterior margin of the anterior arc and the transversal bar. Transversal bar almost twice as wide as the anterior margin of the anterior arc. Posterior diverticulum membranous, round and distinct (Fig. 12).</p>Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir BoÄŸaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on pages 383-385, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    FIGURES 8–10 in New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 8–10. Dasumia capacii sp. nov. 8. Bulb (right), retrolateral view 9. Ditto, nearly retrolateral view 10. Bulb (left), prolateral view. Abbreviations: Ap a, Apophysis a; Ap b, Apophysis b; C, conductor; E embolus.Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir Boğaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on page 384, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    Harpactea elvericii Kunt & Özkütük 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Harpactea elvericii</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 37–43</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> <b>Holotype</b> 1 ♂ (ETZM), Alanya Dist., Avsallar Town (36°38’21.50”N 31°45’24.88”E), asl c. 30 m, 04 Jan 2013, leg. M. Elverici. <b>Paratypes</b> 5 ♂, 4 ♀, 1J (ETZM), same data as holotype — 1 ♂, 2 ♀ (ETZM), Alanya Dist., Avsallar Town (36°38’21.50”N 31°45’24.88”E), asl c. 30 m, 04 Jan 2013, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 1 ♀, 1 ♂, 2J (ETZM), Alanya Dist., Dim Dam (36°33’48.48”N 32°9’4.42”E), asl c. 226 m, 06 Jan 2013, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 3 ♂, 4 ♀ (ETZM), Alanya Dist., Dim Valley (36°32’28.00”N 32° 5’49.00”E), asl c. 44 m, 6 Jan 2013, leg. M. Elverici — 2 ♀, 8J (ETZM), Alanya Dist., Dim Valley (36°32’33.15”N 32° 6’18.28”E), asl c. 20 m, 15 Sept 2013, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 4 ♂, 6 ♀ (ETZM), GazipaŞa Dist., Adanda Vill., Adanda Castle (36°14’13.00”N 32°28’4.00”E), asl c. 800 m, 29 Mar 2017, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt.</p> <p> <b>Etymology:</b> The specific epithet is a patronym, honoring a friend of the authors, Turkish arachnologist, Dr. Mert Elverici.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> The male of <i>H. elvericii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> closely resembles <i>H. bilecenoglui</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> by the lack of conductor and the straigh embolus, but they can be easily distinguished by the shape of the embolus (Figs 27–30, 40–41). Namely, in <i>H. bilecenoglui</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> the embolus becomes distally thinner, after the proximal half, whereas in <i>H. elvericii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> becomes thinner after the first proximal quarter. The bulb of both species is also very similar to that of <i>H. sanctaeinsulae</i> (Figs 44–45), however, in the latter, the embolus is thinner and more delicate.</p> <p> The vulva of <i>H. elvericii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles that of <i>H.</i> prope <i>sbordonii</i> Brignoli, 1978 by the short and folded spermatheca, but it differs by the very short and spine-like spermathecal keel in <i>H. elvericii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, while in <i>H.</i> prope <i>sbordonii</i> is longer and square-like outgrowth at the frontal margin (Fig. 43).</p> <p> <b>Description: Measurements: [Holotype ♂ / Paratypes ♀]</b> TL 4.35/4.90–5.20; AL 2.35/2.75–3.00; CL 2.00/2.15–2.20; CW 1.55/1.60–1.65; Clh 0.06/0.04–0.06; AEd 0.12/0.12–0.12; iAE 0.04/0.03–0.04; PLEd 0.11/0.11–0.11; PMEd 0.09/0.10–0.10; ChF 0.23/0.23–0.35; ChG 0.23/0.23–0.26; ChL 0.70/0.75–0.80.</p> <p> <b>[Paratype ♂]</b> TL 5.05; AL 2.90; CL 2.15; CW 1.65; Clh 0.05; AEd 0.12; iAE 0.02; PLEd 0.11; PMEd 0.10; ChF 0.25; ChG 0.25; ChL 0.85.</p> <p>Medium sized harpacteine spiders. Carapace reddish in both sexes. There is no difference in tone between the head and thoracic region. Thoracic regions pentagonal; head region short, narrow and rounded anteriorly. Fovea dark brown, longitudinal and distinct (Fig. 37). AE, PLE and PME close to each other, arranged annularly, silvery colored. Sternum, labium, gnahtocoxae brown. Sternum yellowish with brownish setae. Tips of the labium and gnatocoxae with blackish setae. Chelicerae reddish. Surface of the chelicerae medially covered with protuberances bearing short black setae. Cheliceral groove with four weakly developed teeth. Promarginal teeth are larger than retromarginal teeth. Of the promarginal teeth, the first tooth near the base of the cheliceral groove is almost half as large as the second. There is a gap between the two about the width of the base of the second tooth. The first retromarginal tooth is in the centre of the cheliceral groove and aligned between the promarginal teeth. The second retromarginal tooth on top is almost twice the size of the first (Fig. 39). Abdomen grayish, cylindrical. Surface covered with blackish setae. Some males with a scutum indistinctly, others with a very distinct scutum ventrally on the abdomen, pregastrally positioned on the right and left (Fig. 38). Legs yellowish brown. Anterior legs darker than posteriors. Leg formula: VI, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements given in Tables 9 and 10.</p> <p> <b>Palp (Figs 40–41):</b> Palpal tarsus longer than tibia. Tegulum oval, more rounded posteriorly than anteriorly. Embolus spiniform, broad at base, roughly the same length as tegulum. Embolus displays a very slight dorsal sinuosity medially. Conductor and median apophysis absent.</p> <p> <b>Vulva (Figs 42–43):</b> Spermatecha characteristic; extremely broad anteriorly.We can suggest that the spermatheca structurally consists of three parts. The distal, widest first part, to which the spermathecal keel is attached (Fig. 43). Below it, in the centre, is the second part, almost half the width of the first. Between the first and second parts, there is a deep cleft (Fig. 42). The third part merges with the roundish structures and is rod-shaped. Spermathecal keel reduced to a very short spike on the left side. Transversal bar in the form of a thin belt, the middle where it joins the receptaculum is relatively well sclerotised. Posterior diverticulum rounded, distinct (Fig. 42).</p>Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir BoÄŸaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on pages 393-396, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    Harpactea kankilicorum Kunt & Özkütük 2023, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Harpactea kankilicorum</i> sp. nov. <p>Figs 55–61, 63–64</p> <p> <b>Material examined:</b> <b>Holotype</b> 1 ♂ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Beetwen Sarısu-Beldibi (36°47’6.26”N 30°34’9.29”E), asl c. 18 m, 25 Feb 2015, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt. <b>Paratypes</b> 1 ♀ (ETZM), same data as holotype — 3 ♂, 3 ♀ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Göynük Canyon (36°41’0.02”N 30°31’36.95”E), asl c. 104 m, 10 Mar 2016, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 2 ♀, 1 ♂, 4J (ETZM), Kumluca Dist., Adrasan Vill. (36°17’47.22’’N 30°28’31.07’’E), asl c. 20 m, 25 Feb 2016, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 4 ♀, 1 ♂, 4J (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Gedelme Plateau (36°37’30.02”N 30°26’40.20”E), asl c. 763 m, 25 Mar 2017, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt — 1 ♀ (ETZM), Kemer Dist., Üçoluk Plateau (36°38’50.49”N 30°26’1.68”E), asl c. 1078 m, 25 Mar 2017, leg. Kadir Boğac Kunt.</p> <p> <b>Etymology:</b> The new species was named in honor of the “Kankılıç Family (Zeynel Abidin, Selvi, Tolga, Teoman and Gülbahar)”, which made very important contributions to the education in the life of the first author.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis:</b> The male palp of <i>H. kankilicorum</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles <i>H. alanyana</i> Özkütük, Elverici, Marusik & Kunt, 2015, <i>H. cressa</i> Brignoli, 1984 and <i>H. sturanyi</i> (Nosek, 1905) by the distal projection of the anterior part of the tegulum, the long, rounded embolus, bent 90°, and the sheet-like conductor with two distal apophyses. It is distinguished form the former species by the distal projection of the tegulum. Of these species, <i>H. alanyana</i> lacks the medial apophysis. The conductor consists of two prominent apophyses in <i>H. alanyana</i>, <i>H. cressa</i> and <i>H. sturanyi</i>, while in <i>H. kankilicorum</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> it is a double-layered plate (Fig. 61). Also in <i>H. kankilicorum</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, embolus curves distally more tightly than in <i>H. alanyana</i> (Figs 57–62).</p> <p> The vulva of <i>H. kankilicorum</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> resembles that of <i>H. nuragica</i> Alicata, 1966, an endemic of Sardinia island, by the short, and distaly rounded spermatheca, with a keel projected distally, but it can be differentiated by much more swollen spermatheca in <i>H. kankilicorum</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></p> <p> <b>Description: Measurements: [Holotype ♂ / Paratypes ♀]</b> TL 2.60/3.40–3.60; AL 1.45/2.15–2.25; CL 1.15/1.25–1.35; CW 1.10/1.10–1.20; Clh 0.03/0.02–0.02; AEd 0.07/0.08–0.08; iAE 0.02/0.02–0.02; PLEd 0.07/0.07–0.07; PMEd 0.05/0.06–0.06; ChF 0.17/0.20–0.23; ChG 0.17/0.20–0.23; ChL 0.36/0.51–0.55.</p> <p> <b>[Paratype ♂]</b> TL 3.15; AL 1.65; CL 1.50; CW 0.95; Clh 0.02; AEd 0.09; iAE 0.02; PLEd 0.08; PMEd 0.07; ChF 0.18; ChG 0.18; ChL 0.47.</p> <p>Small sized harpacteine spiders. Carapace reddish in both sexes. Thoracic region pentagonal, head region roundish anteriorly. Transition between head and thoracic regions distinct. Fovea dark brown, longitudinal, distinct (Fig. 55).</p> <p>AE, PLE and PME close to each other, arranged annularly. AEs, PLEs, and PMEs are seperated. Sternum, labium, gnatocoxae brown. Chelicerae reddish, brown. The promarginal part of the cheliceral groove is relatively strong; the retromarginal part has two very small teeth. The one at the base of the promarginal tooth is larger than the other, and there is an opening between the two, approximately the length of the base width of the first. The retromarginal tooth near the base of the cheliceral groove is aligned with the centre of the first of the promarginal teeth. The retromarginal teeth are six to seven times as far apart as their basal length (Fig. 56). Abdomen cylindrical, white; covered with blackish setae. Legs brownish. Leg formula: VI, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements given in tables 13 and 14.</p> <p> <b>Palp (Figs 57–61):</b> Palpal tarsus is shorter than the tibia. Tegulum piriform (Fig. 57). Palpal tarsus conical, shorter than tibia (Fig. 60). Transition zone between tegulum and distal extensions is long and rectangular, strikingly (Fig. 59).</p> <p>Embolus black and strongly sclerotized (Fig. 57). Located on the posterior edge of this transition zone and there is a deep indentation just before it. The embolus originates at the distal end of this indentation, curving strongly towards the median apophysis as a hook. Conductor is a double-layered structure (Fig. 61), bearing a slightly curved tip. Median apophysis patelliform, located just opposite the embolus base (Fig. 61).</p> <p> <b>Vulva (Figs 63–64):</b> The first quarter of the spermatheca is developed as spermathecal keel and is spinous. The second and third quarters expanded and took the shape of a sphere (Fig. 63). The fourth quarter is rod-shaped and almost half the width of the spherical part. The ends of the anterior margin of the anterior arc are directed anteriorly. Transversal bar short. Posterior diverticulum membranous, circular (Fig. 63).</p>Published as part of <i>Kunt, Kadir BoÄŸaç & Özkütük, Recep Sulhi, 2023, New data on the Harpacteinae of Turkey (Araneae, Dysderidae), pp. 379-408 in Zootaxa 5375 (3)</i> on pages 400-402, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10199980">http://zenodo.org/record/10199980</a&gt

    TÜRKİYE ÖRÜMCEK (ARANEAE) FAUNASI İÇİN YENİ KAYITLAR. 10. TETRAGNATHIDAE FAMİLYASI İÇİN İKİ YENİ TÜR KAYDI

    No full text
    Metellina mengei (Blackwall, 1870) ve Tetragnatha pinicola L. Koch, 1870, iki tetragnathid türü Türkiye’den ilk kez rapor edilmektedir. Her iki türe ait resimler makale içerisinde sunulmuştur. Tetragnathidae familyası Türkiye’de ait dört cins 13 tür ile temsil edilmektedir. Bunlardan Metellina segmentata (Clerck, 1757)’nin varlığı ise şüphelidir
    corecore