Distribution of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol in several different postmortem matrices

Cannabis is the most widely used illicit substance worldwide. A limited number of studies have investigated whether tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) can be detected in other postmortem matrices than blood and urine. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of THC and CBD in several different postmortem matrices. Concentrations in peripheral blood were compared to those in cardiac blood, pericardial fluid, psoas muscle, vastus lateralis muscle, and vitreous humor. A total of 39 postmortem forensic autopsy cases were included. THC and CBD were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. We were able to detect both THC and CBD in most of the analyzed matrices. For vitreous humor, however, only approximately 50% of the cases were available for analysis, and only two were found to be positive. Median concentrations in peripheral blood were 0.0040 (0.00042–0.056) mg/L for THC and 0.0013 (0–0.023) mg/L for CBD. The concentration ratios between pericardial fluid and cardiac blood compared to peripheral blood were< 1 for both THC and CBD for the majority of the cases. For THC, a median ratio of 0.60 (0.063–7.2) and 0.65 (0.068–4.8) were found for pericardial fluid and cardiac blood, respectively, compared to peripheral blood, whereas for CBD the corresponding median ratios were 0.40 (0.010–1.9) and 0.80 (0.017–2.4). The THC concentrations in psoas muscle and vastus lateralis muscle were high compared to those in peripheral blood in several cases, and large variations in the muscles to peripheral blood concentration ratios were seen. This was also the case for CBD. Our study shows that THC and CBD can be detected in postmortem matrices other than peripheral blood, and results from other matrices might provide important information in forensic cases where peripheral blood is not available. However, vitreous humor was not suitable for detecting neither THC nor CBD

Selectivity and sensitivity of urine fentanyl test strips to detect fentanyl analogues in illicit drugs.

BACKGROUND:: Urine fentanyl test strips have been employed to check street drugs for fentanyl and fentanyl analogue contamination, but there is limited evidence for the applicability of fentanyl strips for this purpose. We examined the ability of four commercially-available fentanyl test strips to detect fentanyl and a range of fentanyl analogues currently on the recreational drug market. METHODS: Four brands of fentanyl test strips (Rapid Response, One Step, Nal van Minden, and Rapid Self Test) were examined using single-component drug solutions containing fentanyl, 28 fentanyl analogues, four non-fentanyl synthetic opioids, or eight traditional drugs of abuse. The effect of co-presence of heroin or ascorbic acid on test results was also examined. RESULTS: All test strips detected fentanyl as well as 21-24 of the 28 fentanyl analogues tested. One of the test strip brands gave false positive results in the presence of ascorbic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl test strips successfully detected the majority of fentanyl analogues tested. Drug solutions for testing should not be overly dilute, since the test results are highly concentration dependent. Fentanyl test strips have utility as a harm reduction tool, but they are no panacea for overdose since certain fentanyl analogues are not detected

Methadone, Buprenorphine, Oxycodone, Fentanyl and Tramadol in Multiple Postmortem Matrices

Abstract Peripheral blood (PB) concentrations are generally preferred for postmortem toxicological interpretation, but some autopsy cases may lack blood for sampling due to decomposition or large traumas, etc. In such cases, other tissues or bodily fluids must be sampled; however, limited information exists on postmortem concentrations in matrices other than blood. Pericardial fluid (PF), muscle and vitreous humor (VH) have been suggested as alternatives to blood, but only a few studies have investigated the detection of opioids in these matrices. In this study, we aimed to investigate the detection of methadone, buprenorphine, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol in postmortem samples of PF, skeletal muscle and VH, in addition to PB and cardiac blood and if drug concentrations in these alternative matrices were comparable to those in PB and thereby useful for interpretation. In most of the 54 included cases, only one opioid was detected. Methadone, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol were detected in all of the alternative matrices in almost all cases, while buprenorphine was detected less often. For methadone, the concentrations in the alternative matrices, except in VH, were relatively similar to those in PB. Larger variations in concentrations were found for buprenorphine, oxycodone and tramadol. Quantitative analyses appeared useful for fentanyl, in all of the alternative matrices, but only four cases were included. Toxicological analyses of opioids in these alternative postmortem matrices can be useful for detection, but quantitative results must be interpreted with caution

Comparative study of postmortem concentrations of antidepressants in several different matrices

Peripheral blood (PB) is considered to be the golden standard for measuring postmortem drug concentrations. In several cases, PB is however not available, but information regarding drug findings might still be crucial in order to determine the cause of death. Antidepressants are frequently detected in postmortem samples from forensic toxicology cases, but the literature investigating concentrations in other matrices than peripheral and heart blood is limited. We here describe a study for comparison of concentrations for a large number of different drugs in six different matrices. A total of 173 postmortem cases were included in the study material. The results from 44 cases with findings of antidepressants (amitriptyline/nortriptyline, citalopram, mianserin, mirtazapine, paroxetine, sertraline, trimipramine and venlafaxine) are presented in this article. Concentrations in peripheral and cardiac blood (CB), pericardial fluid (PF), two muscle samples and vitreous humour (VH) are compared. Ratios between concentrations in different matrices have also been compiled from available literature. All the investigated antidepressants were detected in all different matrices, and comparable concentration levels were found in the different matrices with a few exceptions. Concentrations in VH were generally lower than in the other matrices, and in a few cases with low concentrations in blood the antidepressants were not detected in VH. For most of the cases, ratios of 0.5–2 were found between concentration in PB and that in the other matrices. Some deviant concentrations where however found. This study shows that CB, PF, muscle and VH can provide important indications of the corresponding concentrations in PB when PB is not available

Distinguishing Between Cyclopropylfentanyl and Crotonylfentanyl by Methods Commonly Available in the Forensic Laboratory

Background: The opioid analgesic fentanyl and its analogues pose a major health concern due to its high potency and the increasing number of overdose deaths worldwide. The analogues of fentanyl may differ in potency, toxicity, and legal status, and it is therefore important to develop analytical methods for their correct identification. This can be challenging since many fentanyl analogues are structural isomers. Two fentanyl isomers that have been in the spotlight lately due to difficulties regarding separation and identification are cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl, which have been reported to display nearly identical fragmentation patterns and chromatographic behavior. Methods: Chromatographic separation of cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography was investigated using 3 different stationary phases (high strength silica T3, ethylsiloxane/silica hybrid C18, and Kinetex biphenyl) using gradient elution with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mM ammonium formate pH 3.1 and MeOH. Detection was performed by tandem mass spectrometry. In addition, the major metabolites of the 2 compounds formed on incubation with human liver microsomes were identified by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. Results: Baseline separation of cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl was achieved on the ethylsiloxane/silica hybrid C18 column with retention times of 6.79 and 7.35 minutes, respectively. The major metabolites of the 2 analogues formed by human liver microsomes differed, with the main biotransformation being N-dealkylation and carboxylation for cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl, respectively. We demonstrated the usefulness of the 2 approaches by unambiguously identifying cyclopropylfentanyl, as well as its metabolites, in 2 authentic postmortem blood samples. Conclusions: In this study, we successfully demonstrated that cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl can be distinguished by methods commonly available in forensic laboratories

Is Hair Analysis Useful in Postmortem Cases?

In postmortem cases, detection of drugs in blood is most relevant with regard to determining cause of death. However, it is sometimes also of interest to gain as much information as possible regarding the deceased's use of drugs in the period before death. The aim of this study was to compare results from analyses of a repertoire of psychoactive medicinal drugs in blood and hair samples from a larger material of postmortem cases. Hair samples in addition to blood were collected from 55 forensic autopsies and analyzed for a repertoire of 39 medicinal drugs (benzodiazepines, antidepressants and antipsychotics) using av fully validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. In total, hair analyses gave information of the use of drugs not detected in blood in 47 of the 55 cases (85%). The most frequent single drugs detected in hair, but absent in blood, were benzodiazepines (64%), followed by antidepressants (35%). In each case, 1-10 (median two) single drugs were detected in hair, but absent in blood. In only two cases (4%), benzodiazepines were detected in blood and no benzodiazepines were detected in hair. In conclusion, hair analyses in addition to blood frequently indicate prior use of drugs that could yield important information about for instance unknown psychiatric diagnoses. In only a small number of cases lack of detections from the same drug class in hair might indicate reduced tolerance to drug effects