IDENTITAS DAYAK KATAB KEBAHAN DI KABUPATEN MELAWI KALIMANTAN BARAT (Studi tentang Konstruksi Identitas Etno-Religio pada Masyarakat Dayak)

There has been an existing understanding in West Borneo that the word Dayak is affiliated with Christianity and/or local beliefs. The existence of the Katab Kebahan Dayak identity which is ethnically rooted from the Kebahan Dayak and religiously affiliated with Islam is unique. And it is interesting not only for further elaboration about the exceptionality of the identity of the Islam Dayak but also for public to know more about social and political policies of local government related to local culture and social changes in the region with regards to the community. The Katab Kebahan Dayak identity indicates a social identification carrying a significant factor of Dayak cultures that is very important to consider in policy making process. Therefore, the study plays a significant role in the efforts of understanding identity issues with regards to ethnicity and religiosity which are significantly interrelated in the contexts of West Borneo society, especially in Melawi District. As an ethnographic and anthropological work, this project aims at discovering a comprehensive information and knowledge and finding better explanation of the local identity construction, especially on the aspects of ethnicity and religiosity. The focus of this works is the growing of cultural awareness of the people of Katab Kebahan Dayak on the issue of ethno-religious identity of being Muslim Dayak in the contexts of Dayak as (understood) non-Muslim. This project emphasizes ethnicity and religiosity as the two significant aspects on the construction of communal identities in West Borneo, especially for Malay and Dayak ethnic groups. This work is a field research project conducted in Melawi District area employing qualitative method. The data gathering is conducted through observation

REPRESENTASI KUASA DALAM PENGELOLAAN PERPUSTAKAAN (STUDI KASUS PADA PERPUSTAKAAN PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM DI YOGYAKARTA)

Library as a cultural product constitutes a dynamic arena in which various different actors are on the encounters. This phenomenon becomes an interesting object to research in order to understand power constellations and relations amongst library actors. That the process shows their social practice and interaction demonstrates highly contested power for ideologies in the management of Islamic university libraries in Yogyakarta. In relation to the practice and interaction amongst those actors, this research tries to find out the power representation amongst them at the library management as well as to investigate those ideologies involved in the contest and finally to show how these ideologies are contested in the library management. In doing so, the researcher employs the concepts of power by Michel Foucault, trio-concept (Habitus, Field, and Capital) by Pierre Bourdieu, and some other related theories such as ideology by Louis Althusser and culture by Raymond Williams as a conceptual framework to analyse discursive practices of those libraries. This analysis was based on a constructionist-phenomenological approach using a cultural studies paradigm through a case study at three Islamic university libraries in Yogyakarta (libraries of UIN (Universitas Islam Negeri) Sunan Kalijaga, UII (Universitas Islam Indonesia), and UMY (Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta)). As a qualitative approach, depth interview with 15 informants has become a main technique for data collection accompanied with direct observation and documentation techniques as a way to clarify primary data in research. All data collected were analysed, in a critical interpretive way, through Miles and Huberman technique of analysis by three steps: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion or verification. In addition, secondary data collection technique of questionnaire (Scale-Four of Likert) given to 65 respondents was used as a way to verify obscure data and find a clear conclusion. Through the above theoretical and methodological approach, the researcher concludes that the library discursive practices demonstrate unbalanced power representation which takes place amongst library actors, both internally and externally. This imbalance influences the professionalism of the management of Islamic university libraries in Yogyakarta. In such situation, various groups and ideologies represented in the library management, such as religious thoughts, organisation lines, and gender issues, have played their roles to achieve their domination and hegemony. Such processes lead those libraries to serve as an ideological site which can be seen in several issues such as ideological types and preserved cultures in the libraries. In addition, contestation amongst actors as seen in the field is embodied in various forms of struggle such as librarian versus nonlibrarian and those from both internal and external which all demonstrate their games to achieve power

WACANA PANCASILA DALAM ERA REFORMASI (Studi Kebudayaan terhadap Pasang Surut Wacana Pancasila dalam Kontestasi Kehidupan Sosial dan Politik)

This studies focus on the production and reproduction of the term Pancasila in the reformation era. In this era of democratic government, there has been changes in how the structural form is controlled, even though as structure it has not been significant , but process of democracy is still continuing. The main question that should be asked is in the unstable usage of Pancasila as a contextual power in around other influence of social and political dynamism of reformation era. This studies use qualitative method to see the involvement and usage of Pancasila in the political mainstream of Indonesia, including on how they interperate and combine Pancasila in their political practice as an ideology. On of the most important finding in this studies is that the term Pancasila �grew stronger� while there are conflict of religions and ethnics problem is on the high tension. Besides, the issue of modernization also being rise towards the term Pancasila and question it as an ideology. There are two important indicator that made the term Pancasila in fluctuation. The first one is when there is intolerant action with in the basis of religion or ethnic differences, and secondly is on the strengthening modern lifestyle which is exploitated into consumption. While Indonesia is facing the problem around issue of well being, the term usage of Pancasila doesn�t grow stronger. In the problem of underprivilage citizens for an instance, the value of Pancasila is not nvolved like it is written in the second point, which is justice and civilized in humanity and the fifth point, which is the social justice for all the people of Indonesia. The era of reformation also mark the strengthening of religious ideology, especially Islam. The implication towards Pancasila is then put aside away. In mass media, the term Pancasila only fill a space only and only in the certain moment. Pancasila only then grow stronger in its birth date or on the moment when disintegration of this country is threaten. Almost no mass media open a space or program which specialized on spreading Pancasila as an ideology. Due to this absent reminder of Pancasila as an ideology, this is seen as an irony. On the concept ideology of �Althuserian� which occur in the practice of family , mass media, education and religion foundation, Pancasila is only involved as a comparison and not as ideology. Pancasila then in the era of reformation does not contribute in the making of social formation and leadership. What makes it worst now for Pancasila is that it does not been use ideology and therefore lose its main function. If it is seen in the perspective of �Gramscian�, the indication gives the same result, where Pancasila doesn�t involved in the process of hegemonic. While Pancasila have not been planted as ideology through hegemonic. Therefore, there were no evidence of cognition of the Indonesian over the period of history. In that case, Pancasila is not functioning as the basis structure of Indonesian people. While from the opposite direction, in the reformation era, it is the religion site that use the function of ideology, either from the perspective Althuserian and/or Gramscian. The term religious, especially Islam, occur a practice �apparartus� of family, mass media, education and the religions itself. The term religious operates intensively inside the institution of family and education foundation which later implicates on the thickening og identity with the basis of religions. Eve though only as symbol, the attitude of the people is controlled more from the ideology of religions rather than the ideology of Pancasila. Religion also operates intensively in the social institution though the process of �hagemonisasi� cognition of the people. This process is still continuing Pancasila slowly being put aside