1,315 research outputs found
Canonical Proof nets for Classical Logic
Proof nets provide abstract counterparts to sequent proofs modulo rule
permutations; the idea being that if two proofs have the same underlying
proof-net, they are in essence the same proof. Providing a convincing proof-net
counterpart to proofs in the classical sequent calculus is thus an important
step in understanding classical sequent calculus proofs. By convincing, we mean
that (a) there should be a canonical function from sequent proofs to proof
nets, (b) it should be possible to check the correctness of a net in polynomial
time, (c) every correct net should be obtainable from a sequent calculus proof,
and (d) there should be a cut-elimination procedure which preserves
correctness. Previous attempts to give proof-net-like objects for propositional
classical logic have failed at least one of the above conditions. In [23], the
author presented a calculus of proof nets (expansion nets) satisfying (a) and
(b); the paper defined a sequent calculus corresponding to expansion nets but
gave no explicit demonstration of (c). That sequent calculus, called LK\ast in
this paper, is a novel one-sided sequent calculus with both additively and
multiplicatively formulated disjunction rules. In this paper (a self-contained
extended version of [23]), we give a full proof of (c) for expansion nets with
respect to LK\ast, and in addition give a cut-elimination procedure internal to
expansion nets - this makes expansion nets the first notion of proof-net for
classical logic satisfying all four criteria.Comment: Accepted for publication in APAL (Special issue, Classical Logic and
Computation
From Proof Nets to the Free *-Autonomous Category
In the first part of this paper we present a theory of proof nets for full
multiplicative linear logic, including the two units. It naturally extends the
well-known theory of unit-free multiplicative proof nets. A linking is no
longer a set of axiom links but a tree in which the axiom links are subtrees.
These trees will be identified according to an equivalence relation based on a
simple form of graph rewriting. We show the standard results of
sequentialization and strong normalization of cut elimination. In the second
part of the paper we show that the identifications enforced on proofs are such
that the class of two-conclusion proof nets defines the free *-autonomous
category.Comment: LaTeX, 44 pages, final version for LMCS; v2: updated bibliograph
Constructing Fully Complete Models of Multiplicative Linear Logic
The multiplicative fragment of Linear Logic is the formal system in this
family with the best understood proof theory, and the categorical models which
best capture this theory are the fully complete ones. We demonstrate how the
Hyland-Tan double glueing construction produces such categories, either with or
without units, when applied to any of a large family of degenerate models. This
process explains as special cases a number of such models from the literature.
In order to achieve this result, we develop a tensor calculus for compact
closed categories with finite biproducts. We show how the combinatorial
properties required for a fully complete model are obtained by this glueing
construction adding to the structure already available from the original
category.Comment: 72 pages. An extended abstract of this work appeared in the
proceedings of LICS 201
Introduction to linear logic and ludics, part II
This paper is the second part of an introduction to linear logic and ludics,
both due to Girard. It is devoted to proof nets, in the limited, yet central,
framework of multiplicative linear logic and to ludics, which has been recently
developped in an aim of further unveiling the fundamental interactive nature of
computation and logic. We hope to offer a few computer science insights into
this new theory
An Abstract Approach to Stratification in Linear Logic
We study the notion of stratification, as used in subsystems of linear logic
with low complexity bounds on the cut-elimination procedure (the so-called
light logics), from an abstract point of view, introducing a logical system in
which stratification is handled by a separate modality. This modality, which is
a generalization of the paragraph modality of Girard's light linear logic,
arises from a general categorical construction applicable to all models of
linear logic. We thus learn that stratification may be formulated independently
of exponential modalities; when it is forced to be connected to exponential
modalities, it yields interesting complexity properties. In particular, from
our analysis stem three alternative reformulations of Baillot and Mazza's
linear logic by levels: one geometric, one interactive, and one semantic
Pomset logic: a logical and grammatical alternative to the Lambek calculus
Thirty years ago, I introduced a non commutative variant of classical linear
logic, called POMSET LOGIC, issued from a particular denotational semantics or
categorical interpretation of linear logic known as coherence spaces. In
addition to the multiplicative connectives of linear logic, pomset logic
includes a non-commutative connective, "" called BEFORE, which is
associative and self-dual: (observe that there
is no swapping), and pomset logic handles Partially Ordered MultiSETs of
formulas. This classical calculus enjoys a proof net calculus, cut-elimination,
denotational semantics, but had no sequent calculus, despite my many attempts
and the study of closely related deductive systems like the calculus of
structures. At the same period, Alain Lecomte introduced me to Lambek calculus
and grammars. We defined a grammatical formalism based on pomset logic, with
partial proof nets as the deductive systems for parsing-as-deduction, with a
lexicon mapping words to partial proof nets. The study of pomset logic and of
its grammatical applications has been out of the limelight for several years,
in part because computational linguists were not too keen on proof nets.
However, recently Sergey Slavnov found a sequent calculus for pomset logic, and
reopened the study of pomset logic. In this paper we shall present pomset logic
including both published and unpublished material. Just as for Lambek calculus,
Pomset logic also is a non commutative variant of linear logic --- although
Lambek calculus appeared 30 years before linear logic ! --- and as in Lambek
calculus it may be used as a grammar. Apart from this the two calculi are quite
different, but perhaps the algebraic presentation we give here, with terms and
the semantic correctness criterion, is closer to Lambek's view
- …