USE OF SOURCES IN ACADEMIC WRITING BY MA APPLIED LINGUISTICS & TESOL STUDENTS: TEXTUAL BORROWING OR PLAGIARISM?

The purposes of the project were (1) to enhance our understanding of students' use of sources, from the accessing of sources to the production of academic writing. This was achieved through a literature review and the student interviews based on their submitted academic assignments. We found that there was a connection between some students' approaches to the composition of assignments and their use of inter-textual borrowing, which in some cases was in danger of constituting plagiarism. A related difficulty facing students, revealed in the course of the project, was how to articulate their own voices with those of the literature.  (2) To contribute to improved guidance and training for students in the use of sources in academic writing, according to prevailing academic conventions. Training and awareness raising material has been produced and disseminated. Research articles are in progress

Spartan Daily, March 19, 2002

Volume 118, Issue 38https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/10611/thumbnail.jp

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationThe present study investigated the effects of the explicit teaching of formulaic sequences (i.e., academic and topic-induced) on L2 writing. The research examined separately the effects of the treatment on the students' abilities to produce the target formulaic sequences in controlled (i.e., C-tests) and uncontrolled situations (i.e., essays), and to produce better quality essays. The study, through posttreatment interviews, also attempted to glean insights into the approaches L2 writers use for the production of the target formulaic sequences. The study found that the students in the treatment condition performed at a significantly higher level than the students in the control condition on measures of the production of academic formulaic sequences in a controlled situation and the production of topic-induced formulaic sequences in controlled and uncontrolled situations, but there were no significant differences between the groups on the measures of students' abilities to produce academic formulaic sequences in an uncontrolled situation and to produce better quality writing. The results of the study suggest that the explicit instruction facilitated learning of the target formulaic sequences when the learning is measured by a test. Most importantly, the study found that explicit instruction helped students become familiar enough with the formulaic sequences to recognize their usefulness and employ them in their essays. The results indicated that the instructional approach helped low performing writers produce iv essays of better quality and high performing writers increase the awareness of the frequencies and functions of the formulaic sequencers in expert writers' texts. The findings from the interviews indicated that the students' abilities to produce the academic and topic-induced formulaic sequences in their compositions may depend on the students' perceived need to use them in their writing, and that students' abilities to produce the academic formulaic sequences in essays may be influenced by the interaction of students' awareness of the frequency and functions of academic formulaic sequences and their motivation to sound academic in their writing. The study results suggest that the instructional approach may be helpful for the students' learning of formulaic sequences for the purposes of writing and should be the focus of future experimental research

THE NATURE OF FEEDBACK:HOW DIFFERENT TYPES OF PEER FEEDBACK AFFECT WRITING PERFORMANCE

Although providing feedback is commonly practiced in education, there is general agreement regarding what type of feedback is most helpful and why it is helpful. This study examined the relationship between various types of feedback, potential internal mediators, and the likelihood of implementing feedback. Five main predictions were developed from the feedback literature in writing, specifically regarding feedback features (summarization, identifying problems, providing solutions, localization, explanations, scope, praise, and mitigating language) as they relate to potential causal mediators of problem or solution understand and problem or solution agreement, leading to the final outcome of feedback implementation.To empirically test the proposed feedback model, 1073 feedback segments from writing assessed by peers was analyzed. Feedback was collected using SWoRD, an online peer review system. Each segment was coded for each of the feedback features, implementation, agreement, and understanding. The correlations between the feedback features, levels of mediating variables, and implementation rates revealed several significant relationships. Understanding was the only significant mediator of implementation. Several feedback features were associated with understanding: including solutions, a summary of the performance, and the location of the problem were associated with increased understanding; and explanations to problems were associated with decreased understanding. Implications of these results are discussed

Strategic Error as Style: Finessing the Grammar Checker

Composition studies lacks a comprehensive theory of error, one which successfully defines error in writing and offers a pedagogical response to ostensible errors that neither ignores nor pathologizes them. Electronic text-critiquing technologies offer some promise of helping writers notice and correct errors, but they are under-researched in composition and rarely well-integrated into pedagogical praxis. This research on the grammar and style checker in Microsoft Word considers the program as an electronic checklist for making decisions about what counts as an error in a given rhetorical situation. This study also offers a theory of error grounded in the idea of attention, or cognitive load, some of which an electronic checker can relieve in its areas of its greatest effectiveness, which this research quantifies. The proposed theory of error forms the basis for a pedagogy of register, understood as typified style, and establishes that error itself can be a strategic style move

Decentralized creation of academic documents using a Network Attached Storage (NAS) server

Scholarly document creation continues to face various obstacles. Scholarly text production requires more complex word processors than other forms of texts because of the complex structures of citations, formulas and figures. The need for peer review, often single-blind or double-blind, creates needs for document management that other texts do not require. Additionally, the need for collaborative editing, security and strict document access rules means that many existing word processors are imperfect solutions for academics. Nevertheless, most papers continue to be written using Microsoft Word (Sadeghi et al. 2017). We here analyze some of the problems with existing academic solutions and then present an argument why we believe that running an open source academic writing solution for academic purposes, such as Fidus Writer, on a Network Attached Storage (NAS) server could be a viable alternative.Comment: 15 pages, paper presented at the Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication workshop co-located with the Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2017

Spartan Daily, April 28, 1998

Volume 110, Issue 61https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/9277/thumbnail.jp

Research Article Titles and Disciplinary Conventions: A Corpus Study of Eight Disciplines

Research articles are clearly influenced by the discipline of the research being reported. Just as disciplinary conventions place constraints on, for example, the moves and language use of abstracts and introductions, they also provide a set of options for title design. This study attempts to identify the title conventions of eight disciplines by focusing on various features that play a part in title design: the use of multiple-unit titles (those with subtitles); the use of noun phrases to form the title; and ’a’ or ’the’ in initial position. The length of titles is investigated, as is the proportion of substantive words. Data is based on a 3,200-title corpus of titles from research articles published in prestigious journals in four disciplines in the hard sciences (botany, fluid engineering, geology, and medicine) and four in the soft sciences (economics, education, history, and sociology). The data is presented in a visual form that compares title features by discipline, to demonstrate title conventions and to help novice writers understand the features and options available