10,442 research outputs found
On the Equivalence of Youla, System-level and Input-output Parameterizations
A convex parameterization of internally stabilizing controllers is
fundamental for many controller synthesis procedures. The celebrated Youla
parameterization relies on a doubly-coprime factorization of the system, while
the recent system-level and input-output characterizations require no
doubly-coprime factorization but a set of equality constraints for achievable
closed-loop responses. In this paper, we present explicit affine mappings among
Youla, system-level and input-output parameterizations. Two direct implications
of the affine mappings are 1) any convex problem in Youla, system level, or
input-output parameters can be equivalently and convexly formulated in any
other one of these frameworks, including the convex system-level synthesis
(SLS); 2) the condition of quadratic invariance (QI) is sufficient and
necessary for the classical distributed control problem to admit an equivalent
convex reformulation in terms of Youla, system-level, or input-output
parameters.Comment: 8 pages, 3 figure
Robust Stability of Iterative Learning Control Schemes
A notion of robust stability is developed for iterative learning control in the context of disturbance attenuation. The size of the unmodelled dynamics is captured via a gap distance, which in turn is related to the standard H2 gap metric, and the resulting robustness certificate is qualitatively equivalent to that obtained in classical robust H∞ theory. A bound on the robust stability margin for a specific adaptive ILC design is established
System-level, Input-output and New Parameterizations of Stabilizing Controllers, and Their Numerical Computation
It is known that the set of internally stabilizing controller
is non-convex, but it admits convex
characterizations using certain closed-loop maps: a classical result is the
{Youla parameterization}, and two recent notions are the {system-level
parameterization} (SLP) and the {input-output parameterization} (IOP). In this
paper, we address the existence of new convex parameterizations and discuss
potential tradeoffs of each parametrization in different scenarios. Our main
contributions are: 1) We first reveal that only four groups of stable
closed-loop transfer matrices are equivalent to internal stability: one of them
is used in the SLP, another one is used in the IOP, and the other two are new,
leading to two new convex parameterizations of . 2)
We then investigate the properties of these parameterizations after imposing
the finite impulse response (FIR) approximation, revealing that the IOP has the
best ability of approximating given FIR
constraints. 3) These four parameterizations require no \emph{a priori}
doubly-coprime factorization of the plant, but impose a set of equality
constraints. However, these equality constraints will never be satisfied
exactly in numerical computation. We prove that the IOP is numerically robust
for open-loop stable plants, in the sense that small mismatches in the equality
constraints do not compromise the closed-loop stability. The SLP is known to
enjoy numerical robustness in the state feedback case; here, we show that
numerical robustness of the four-block SLP controller requires case-by-case
analysis in the general output feedback case.Comment: 20 pages; 5 figures. Added extensions on numerial computation and
robustness of closed-loop parameterization
- …