3 research outputs found
Weak-Key Analysis of POET
We evaluate the security of the recently proposed authenticated encryption scheme POET with regard to weak keys when its universal hash functions are instantiated with finite field multiplications. We give explicit constructions for weak key classes not covered by POET\u27s
weak key testing strategy, and demonstrate how to leverage them to obtain universal forgeries
Pipelineable On-Line Encryption
Correct authenticated decryption requires the receiver to buffer the decrypted message until the authenticity check has been performed. In high-speed networks, which must handle large message frames at low latency, this behavior becomes practically infeasible. This paper proposes CCA-secure on-line ciphers as a practical alternative to AE schemes since the former provide some defense against malicious message modifications. Unfortunately, all published on-line ciphers so far are either inherently sequential, or lack a CCA-security proof.
This paper introduces POE, a family of on-line ciphers that combines provable security against chosen-ciphertext attacks with pipelineability to support efficient implementations. POE combines a block cipher and an e-AXU family of hash functions. Different instantiations of POE are given, based on different universal hash functions and suitable for different platforms. Moreover, this paper introduces POET, a provably secure on-line AE scheme, which inherits pipelineability and chosen-ciphertext-security from POE and provides additional resistance against nonce-misuse attacks
General Classification of the Authenticated Encryption Schemes for the CAESAR Competition
An Authenticated encryption scheme is a scheme which provides privacy and integrity by using a secret key. In 2013, CAESAR (the ``Competition for Authenticated Encryption: Security, Applicability, and Robustness\u27\u27) was co-founded by NIST and Dan Bernstein with the aim of finding authenticated encryption schemes
that offer advantages over AES-GCM and are suitable for widespread adoption.
The first round started with 57 candidates in March 2014; and nine of these
first-round candidates where broken and withdrawn from the competition. The
remaining 48 candidates went through an intense process of review, analysis
and comparison. While the cryptographic community benefits greatly from the
manifold different submission designs, their sheer number
implies a challenging amount of study. This paper provides
an easy-to-grasp overview over functional aspects, security parameters, and
robustness offerings by the CAESAR candidates, clustered by their underlying
designs (block-cipher-, stream-cipher-, permutation-/sponge-,
compression-function-based, dedicated). After intensive review and analysis of all 48 candidates by the community, the CAESAR committee selected only 30 candidates for the second round. The announcement for the third round candidates was made on 15th August 2016 and 15 candidates were chosen for the third round