Derandomizing Arthur-Merlin Games using Hitting Sets

We prove that AM (and hence Graph Nonisomorphism) is in NPif for some epsilon > 0, some language in NE intersection coNE requires nondeterministiccircuits of size 2^(epsilon n). This improves recent results of Arvindand K¨obler and of Klivans and Van Melkebeek who proved the sameconclusion, but under stronger hardness assumptions, namely, eitherthe existence of a language in NE intersection coNE which cannot be approximatedby nondeterministic circuits of size less than 2^(epsilon n) or the existenceof a language in NE intersection coNE which requires oracle circuits of size 2^(epsilon n)with oracle gates for SAT (satisfiability).The previous results on derandomizing AM were based on pseudorandomgenerators. In contrast, our approach is based on a strengtheningof Andreev, Clementi and Rolim's hitting set approach to derandomization.As a spin-off, we show that this approach is strong enoughto give an easy (if the existence of explicit dispersers can be assumedknown) proof of the following implication: For some epsilon > 0, if there isa language in E which requires nondeterministic circuits of size 2^(epsilon n),then P=BPP. This differs from Impagliazzo and Wigderson's theorem"only" by replacing deterministic circuits with nondeterministicones

Certified Hardness vs. Randomness for Log-Space

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a language that can be decided in linear space and let $\epsilon >0$ be any constant. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be the exponential hardness assumption that for every $n$, membership in $\mathcal{L}$ for inputs of length~$n$ cannot be decided by circuits of size smaller than $2^{\epsilon n}$. We prove that for every function $f :\{0,1\}^* \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, computable by a randomized logspace algorithm $R$, there exists a deterministic logspace algorithm $D$ (attempting to compute $f$), such that on every input $x$ of length $n$, the algorithm $D$ outputs one of the following: 1: The correct value $f(x)$. 2: The string: ``I am unable to compute $f(x)$ because the hardness assumption $\mathcal{A}$ is false'', followed by a (provenly correct) circuit of size smaller than $2^{\epsilon n'}$ for membership in $\mathcal{L}$ for inputs of length~$n'$, for some $n' = \Theta (\log n)$; that is, a circuit that refutes $\mathcal{A}$. Our next result is a universal derandomizer for $BPL$: We give a deterministic algorithm $U$ that takes as an input a randomized logspace algorithm $R$ and an input $x$ and simulates the computation of $R$ on $x$, deteriministically. Under the widely believed assumption $BPL=L$, the space used by $U$ is at most $C_R \cdot \log n$ (where $C_R$ is a constant depending on~$R$). Moreover, for every constant $c \geq 1$, if $BPL\subseteq SPACE[(\log(n))^{c}]$ then the space used by $U$ is at most $C_R \cdot (\log(n))^{c}$. Finally, we prove that if optimal hitting sets for ordered branching programs exist then there is a deterministic logspace algorithm that, given a black-box access to an ordered branching program $B$ of size $n$, estimates the probability that $B$ accepts on a uniformly random input. This extends the result of (Cheng and Hoza CCC 2020), who proved that an optimal hitting set implies a white-box two-sided derandomization.Comment: Abstract shortened to fit arXiv requirement

Weak Random Sources, Hitting Sets, and BPP Simulations

We show how to simulate any BPP algorithm in polynomial time using a weak random source of r bits and min-entropy r fl for any fl ? 0. This follows from a more general result about sampling with weak random sources. Our result matches an information-theoretic lower bound and solves a question that has been open for some years. The previous best results were a polynomial time simulation of RP [Saks, Srinivasan and Zhou 1995] and a quasi-polynomial time simulation of BPP [Ta-Shma 1996]. Departing significantly from previous related works, we do not use extractors; instead, we use the OR-disperser of [Saks, Srinivasan, and Zhou 1995] in combination with a tricky use of hitting sets borrowed from [Andreev, Clementi, and Rolim 1996]. AMS Subject Classification: 68Q10, 11K45. Key Words and Phrases: Derandomization, Imperfect Sources of Randomness, Hitting Sets, Randomized Computations, Expander Graphs. Abbreviated Title: BPP Simulations using Weak Random Sources. 1 Introduction Randomi..