3 research outputs found

    Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Phoneme Segmentation

    Full text link
    We propose a self-supervised representation learning model for the task of unsupervised phoneme boundary detection. The model is a convolutional neural network that operates directly on the raw waveform. It is optimized to identify spectral changes in the signal using the Noise-Contrastive Estimation principle. At test time, a peak detection algorithm is applied over the model outputs to produce the final boundaries. As such, the proposed model is trained in a fully unsupervised manner with no manual annotations in the form of target boundaries nor phonetic transcriptions. We compare the proposed approach to several unsupervised baselines using both TIMIT and Buckeye corpora. Results suggest that our approach surpasses the baseline models and reaches state-of-the-art performance on both data sets. Furthermore, we experimented with expanding the training set with additional examples from the Librispeech corpus. We evaluated the resulting model on distributions and languages that were not seen during the training phase (English, Hebrew and German) and showed that utilizing additional untranscribed data is beneficial for model performance.Comment: Interspeech 2020 pape

    The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation

    No full text
    Interactive models of language production predict that it should be possible to observe long-distance interactions; effects that arise at one level of processing influence multiple subsequent stages of representation and processing. We examine the hypothesis that disruptions arising in nonform-based levels of planning—specifically, lexical selection—should modulate articulatory processing. A novel automatic phonetic analysis method was used to examine productions in a paradigm yielding both general disruptions to formulation processes and, more specifically, overt errors during lexical selection. This analysis method allowed us to examine articulatory disruptions at multiple levels of analysis, from whole words to individual segments. Baseline performance by young adults was contrasted with young speakers’ performance under time pressure (which previous work has argued increases interaction between planning and articulation) and performance by older adults (who may have difficulties inhibiting nontarget representations, leading to heightened interactive effects). The results revealed the presence of interactive effects. Our new analysis techniques revealed these effects were strongest in initial portions of responses, suggesting that speech is initiated as soon as the first segment has been planned. Interactive effects did not increase under response pressure, suggesting interaction between planning and articulation is relatively fixed. Unexpectedly, lexical selection disruptions appeared to yield some degree of facilitation in articulatory processing (possibly reflecting semantic facilitation of target retrieval) and older adults showed weaker, not stronger interactive effects (possibly reflecting weakened connections between lexical and form-level representations)
    corecore