Bayesian Compression for Deep Learning

Compression and computational efficiency in deep learning have become a problem of great significance. In this work, we argue that the most principled and effective way to attack this problem is by adopting a Bayesian point of view, where through sparsity inducing priors we prune large parts of the network. We introduce two novelties in this paper: 1) we use hierarchical priors to prune nodes instead of individual weights, and 2) we use the posterior uncertainties to determine the optimal fixed point precision to encode the weights. Both factors significantly contribute to achieving the state of the art in terms of compression rates, while still staying competitive with methods designed to optimize for speed or energy efficiency.Comment: Published as a conference paper at NIPS 201

Training Behavior of Sparse Neural Network Topologies

Improvements in the performance of deep neural networks have often come through the design of larger and more complex networks. As a result, fast memory is a significant limiting factor in our ability to improve network performance. One approach to overcoming this limit is the design of sparse neural networks, which can be both very large and efficiently trained. In this paper we experiment training on sparse neural network topologies. We test pruning-based topologies, which are derived from an initially dense network whose connections are pruned, as well as RadiX-Nets, a class of network topologies with proven connectivity and sparsity properties. Results show that sparse networks obtain accuracies comparable to dense networks, but extreme levels of sparsity cause instability in training, which merits further study.Comment: 6 pages. Presented at the 2019 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing (HPEC) Conference. Received "Best Paper" awar

Sparsity in Variational Autoencoders

Working in high-dimensional latent spaces, the internal encoding of data in Variational Autoencoders becomes naturally sparse. We discuss this known but controversial phenomenon sometimes refereed to as overpruning, to emphasize the under-use of the model capacity. In fact, it is an important form of self-regularization, with all the typical benefits associated with sparsity: it forces the model to focus on the really important features, highly reducing the risk of overfitting. Especially, it is a major methodological guide for the correct tuning of the model capacity, progressively augmenting it to attain sparsity, or conversely reducing the dimension of the network removing links to zeroed out neurons. The degree of sparsity crucially depends on the network architecture: for instance, convolutional networks typically show less sparsity, likely due to the tighter relation of features to different spatial regions of the input.Comment: An Extended Abstract of this survey will be presented at the 1st International Conference on Advances in Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence (ASPAI' 2019), 20-22 March 2019, Barcelona, Spai