1,258 research outputs found
Evaluating Information Retrieval and Access Tasks
This open access book summarizes the first two decades of the NII Testbeds and Community for Information access Research (NTCIR). NTCIR is a series of evaluation forums run by a global team of researchers and hosted by the National Institute of Informatics (NII), Japan. The book is unique in that it discusses not just what was done at NTCIR, but also how it was done and the impact it has achieved. For example, in some chapters the reader sees the early seeds of what eventually grew to be the search engines that provide access to content on the World Wide Web, today’s smartphones that can tailor what they show to the needs of their owners, and the smart speakers that enrich our lives at home and on the move. We also get glimpses into how new search engines can be built for mathematical formulae, or for the digital record of a lived human life. Key to the success of the NTCIR endeavor was early recognition that information access research is an empirical discipline and that evaluation therefore lay at the core of the enterprise. Evaluation is thus at the heart of each chapter in this book. They show, for example, how the recognition that some documents are more important than others has shaped thinking about evaluation design. The thirty-three contributors to this volume speak for the many hundreds of researchers from dozens of countries around the world who together shaped NTCIR as organizers and participants. This book is suitable for researchers, practitioners, and students—anyone who wants to learn about past and present evaluation efforts in information retrieval, information access, and natural language processing, as well as those who want to participate in an evaluation task or even to design and organize one
IRGAN: A Minimax Game for Unifying Generative and Discriminative Information Retrieval Models
This paper provides a unified account of two schools of thinking in
information retrieval modelling: the generative retrieval focusing on
predicting relevant documents given a query, and the discriminative retrieval
focusing on predicting relevancy given a query-document pair. We propose a game
theoretical minimax game to iteratively optimise both models. On one hand, the
discriminative model, aiming to mine signals from labelled and unlabelled data,
provides guidance to train the generative model towards fitting the underlying
relevance distribution over documents given the query. On the other hand, the
generative model, acting as an attacker to the current discriminative model,
generates difficult examples for the discriminative model in an adversarial way
by minimising its discrimination objective. With the competition between these
two models, we show that the unified framework takes advantage of both schools
of thinking: (i) the generative model learns to fit the relevance distribution
over documents via the signals from the discriminative model, and (ii) the
discriminative model is able to exploit the unlabelled data selected by the
generative model to achieve a better estimation for document ranking. Our
experimental results have demonstrated significant performance gains as much as
23.96% on Precision@5 and 15.50% on MAP over strong baselines in a variety of
applications including web search, item recommendation, and question answering.Comment: 12 pages; appendix adde
A Survey on Asking Clarification Questions Datasets in Conversational Systems
The ability to understand a user's underlying needs is critical for conversational systems, especially with limited input from users in a conversation. Thus, in such a domain, Asking Clarification Questions (ACQs) to reveal users' true intent from their queries or utterances arise as an essential task. However, it is noticeable that a key limitation of the existing ACQs studies is their incomparability, from inconsistent use of data, distinct experimental setups and evaluation strategies. Therefore, in this paper, to assist the development of ACQs techniques, we comprehensively analyse the current ACQs research status, which offers a detailed comparison of publicly available datasets, and discusses the applied evaluation metrics, joined with benchmarks for multiple ACQs-related tasks. In particular, given a thorough analysis of the ACQs task, we discuss a number of corresponding research directions for the investigation of ACQs as well as the development of conversational systems
Recommended from our members
ANSWER SIMILARITY GROUPING AND DIVERSIFICATION IN QUESTION ANSWERING SYSTEMS
The rise in popularity of mobile and voice search has led to a shift in IR from document to passage retrieval for non-factoid questions. Various datasets such as MSMarco, as well as efficient retrieval models have been developed to identify single best answer passages for this task. However, such models do not specifically address questions which could have multiple or alternative answers. In this dissertation, we focus on this new research area that involves studying answer passage relationships and how this could be applied to passage retrieval tasks.
We first create a high quality dataset for the answer passage similarity task in the context of question answering. Manual annotation of passage pairs is performed to set the similarity labels, from which answer group information is automatically generated. We next investigate different types of representations, which could be used to create effective clusters. We experiment with various unsupervised representations and show that distributional representations outperform term based representations for this task. Next, weak supervision is leveraged to further improve the cluster modeling performance. We use BERT as the underlying model for training and show the relative performance of various weak signals such as GloVe and term-based Language Modeling for this task. In order to apply these clusters to the answer passage retrieval task for multi-answer questions, we use a modified version of the Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) diversification model. We demonstrate that answers retrieved using this model are more diverse i.e, cover more answer types with low redundancy as well as maximize relevance, with respect to the baselines. So far, we used passage clustering as a means to identify answer groups corresponding to a question and apply them in a question answering task. We extend this a step further by looking at related questions within a conversation. For this purpose, we expand the definition of Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) and use this to identify pertinent history passages for such questions. Updated question rewrites generated using these passages are then used to improve the conversational search task. In addition to being the first work that looks at answer relationships, our specific contributions can be summarized as follows: (1) Creation of new datasets with passage similarity and answer type information; (2) Effective passage similarity clustering models using unsupervised representations and weak supervision methods; (3) Applying the passage similarity/clustering information to diversification framework; (4) Identifying good response history candidates using answer passage clustering for the conversational search task
Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment
When asked, current large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT claim that they
can assist us with relevance judgments. Many researchers think this would not
lead to credible IR research. In this perspective paper, we discuss possible
ways for LLMs to assist human experts along with concerns and issues that
arise. We devise a human-machine collaboration spectrum that allows
categorizing different relevance judgment strategies, based on how much the
human relies on the machine. For the extreme point of "fully automated
assessment", we further include a pilot experiment on whether LLM-based
relevance judgments correlate with judgments from trained human assessors. We
conclude the paper by providing two opposing perspectives - for and against the
use of LLMs for automatic relevance judgments - and a compromise perspective,
informed by our analyses of the literature, our preliminary experimental
evidence, and our experience as IR researchers.
We hope to start a constructive discussion within the community to avoid a
stale-mate during review, where work is dammed if is uses LLMs for evaluation
and dammed if it doesn't
Dense Text Retrieval based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey
Text retrieval is a long-standing research topic on information seeking,
where a system is required to return relevant information resources to user's
queries in natural language. From classic retrieval methods to learning-based
ranking functions, the underlying retrieval models have been continually
evolved with the ever-lasting technical innovation. To design effective
retrieval models, a key point lies in how to learn the text representation and
model the relevance matching. The recent success of pretrained language models
(PLMs) sheds light on developing more capable text retrieval approaches by
leveraging the excellent modeling capacity of PLMs. With powerful PLMs, we can
effectively learn the representations of queries and texts in the latent
representation space, and further construct the semantic matching function
between the dense vectors for relevance modeling. Such a retrieval approach is
referred to as dense retrieval, since it employs dense vectors (a.k.a.,
embeddings) to represent the texts. Considering the rapid progress on dense
retrieval, in this survey, we systematically review the recent advances on
PLM-based dense retrieval. Different from previous surveys on dense retrieval,
we take a new perspective to organize the related work by four major aspects,
including architecture, training, indexing and integration, and summarize the
mainstream techniques for each aspect. We thoroughly survey the literature, and
include 300+ related reference papers on dense retrieval. To support our
survey, we create a website for providing useful resources, and release a code
repertory and toolkit for implementing dense retrieval models. This survey aims
to provide a comprehensive, practical reference focused on the major progress
for dense text retrieval
- …