A comprehensive review on motion trajectory reconstruction for EEG-based brain-computer interface

The advance in neuroscience and computer technology over the past decades have made brain-computer interface (BCI) a most promising area of neurorehabilitation and neurophysiology research. Limb motion decoding has gradually become a hot topic in the field of BCI. Decoding neural activity related to limb movement trajectory is considered to be of great help to the development of assistive and rehabilitation strategies for motor-impaired users. Although a variety of decoding methods have been proposed for limb trajectory reconstruction, there does not yet exist a review that covers the performance evaluation of these decoding methods. To alleviate this vacancy, in this paper, we evaluate EEG-based limb trajectory decoding methods regarding their advantages and disadvantages from a variety of perspectives. Specifically, we first introduce the differences in motor execution and motor imagery in limb trajectory reconstruction with different spaces (2D and 3D). Then, we discuss the limb motion trajectory reconstruction methods including experiment paradigm, EEG pre-processing, feature extraction and selection, decoding methods, and result evaluation. Finally, we expound on the open problem and future outlooks

Workshops of the Sixth International Brain–Computer Interface Meeting: brain–computer interfaces past, present, and future

Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) (also referred to as brain–machine interfaces; BMI) are, by definition, an interface between the human brain and a technological application. Brain activity for interpretation by the BCI can be acquired with either invasive or non-invasive methods. The key point is that the signals that are interpreted come directly from the brain, bypassing sensorimotor output channels that may or may not have impaired function. This paper provides a concise glimpse of the breadth of BCI research and development topics covered by the workshops of the 6th International Brain–Computer Interface Meeting

Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks for Decoding and Analyzing Neural Time Series Data

Machine learning is widely adopted to decode multi-variate neural time series, including electroencephalographic (EEG) and single-cell recordings. Recent solutions based on deep learning (DL) outperformed traditional decoders by automatically extracting relevant discriminative features from raw or minimally pre-processed signals. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been successfully applied to EEG and are the most common DL-based EEG decoders in the state-of-the-art (SOA). However, the current research is affected by some limitations. SOA CNNs for EEG decoding usually exploit deep and heavy structures with the risk of overfitting small datasets, and architectures are often defined empirically. Furthermore, CNNs are mainly validated by designing within-subject decoders. Crucially, the automatically learned features mainly remain unexplored; conversely, interpreting these features may be of great value to use decoders also as analysis tools, highlighting neural signatures underlying the different decoded brain or behavioral states in a data-driven way. Lastly, SOA DL-based algorithms used to decode single-cell recordings rely on more complex, slower to train and less interpretable networks than CNNs, and the use of CNNs with these signals has not been investigated. This PhD research addresses the previous limitations, with reference to P300 and motor decoding from EEG, and motor decoding from single-neuron activity. CNNs were designed light, compact, and interpretable. Moreover, multiple training strategies were adopted, including transfer learning, which could reduce training times promoting the application of CNNs in practice. Furthermore, CNN-based EEG analyses were proposed to study neural features in the spatial, temporal and frequency domains, and proved to better highlight and enhance relevant neural features related to P300 and motor states than canonical EEG analyses. Remarkably, these analyses could be used, in perspective, to design novel EEG biomarkers for neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders. Lastly, CNNs were developed to decode single-neuron activity, providing a better compromise between performance and model complexity