Intersecting families of discrete structures are typically trivial

The study of intersecting structures is central to extremal combinatorics. A family of permutations $\mathcal{F} \subset S_n$ is \emph{$t$-intersecting} if any two permutations in $\mathcal{F}$ agree on some $t$ indices, and is \emph{trivial} if all permutations in $\mathcal{F}$ agree on the same $t$ indices. A $k$-uniform hypergraph is \emph{$t$-intersecting} if any two of its edges have $t$ vertices in common, and \emph{trivial} if all its edges share the same $t$ vertices. The fundamental problem is to determine how large an intersecting family can be. Ellis, Friedgut and Pilpel proved that for $n$ sufficiently large with respect to $t$, the largest $t$-intersecting families in $S_n$ are the trivial ones. The classic Erd\H{o}s--Ko--Rado theorem shows that the largest $t$-intersecting $k$-uniform hypergraphs are also trivial when $n$ is large. We determine the \emph{typical} structure of $t$-intersecting families, extending these results to show that almost all intersecting families are trivial. We also obtain sparse analogues of these extremal results, showing that they hold in random settings. Our proofs use the Bollob\'as set-pairs inequality to bound the number of maximal intersecting families, which can then be combined with known stability theorems. We also obtain similar results for vector spaces.Comment: 19 pages. Update 1: better citation of the Gauy--H\`an--Oliveira result. Update 2: corrected statement of the unpublished Hamm--Kahn result, and slightly modified notation in Theorem 1.6 Update 3: new title, updated citations, and some minor correction

Minimum saturated families of sets

We call a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $[n]$ $s$-saturated if it contains no $s$ pairwise disjoint sets, and moreover no set can be added to $\mathcal{F}$ while preserving this property (here $[n] = \{1,\ldots,n\}$). More than 40 years ago, Erd\H{o}s and Kleitman conjectured that an $s$-saturated family of subsets of $[n]$ has size at least $(1 - 2^{-(s-1)})2^n$. It is easy to show that every $s$-saturated family has size at least $\frac{1}{2}\cdot 2^n$, but, as was mentioned by Frankl and Tokushige, even obtaining a slightly better bound of $(1/2 + \varepsilon)2^n$, for some fixed $\varepsilon > 0$, seems difficult. In this note, we prove such a result, showing that every $s$-saturated family of subsets of $[n]$ has size at least $(1 - 1/s)2^n$. This lower bound is a consequence of a multipartite version of the problem, in which we seek a lower bound on $|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s|$ where $\mathcal{F}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{F}_s$ are families of subsets of $[n]$, such that there are no $s$ pairwise disjoint sets, one from each family $\mathcal{F}_i$, and furthermore no set can be added to any of the families while preserving this property. We show that $|\mathcal{F}_1| + \ldots + |\mathcal{F}_s| \ge (s-1)\cdot 2^n$, which is tight e.g.\ by taking $\mathcal{F}_1$ to be empty, and letting the remaining families be the families of all subsets of $[n]$.Comment: 8 page