7 research outputs found

    Desarrollo de habilidades blandas -soft skills en el liderazgo, indispensables para las organizaciones 5.0

    Get PDF
    En un entorno de gran incertidumbre para las organizaciones, el liderazgo tiene el desafío de adaptarse rápidamente al contexto y direccionar al personal en sus procesos de desarrollo, entendiendo las exigencias que la revolución 5.0 plantea para la gestión del cambio como son el Big Data, la inteligencia artificial, el liderazgo tecnológico, el aprendizaje organizacional, entre otros. Por ello, cobran mayor relevancia las habilidades blandas o soft skills en comparación con las duras. Esta investigación busca identificar las tendencias frente a las habilidades blandas en las organizaciones. Se aborda metodológicamente mediante un análisis bibliométrico, con una base de datos según las variables de interés entre los años 2011 y 2022, a través del software VOSwier se realiza un análisis mixto. Esta investigación, se fundamenta en la teoría de gestión por competencias (Levy-Leboyer, 2001) en el contexto del aprendizaje en las organizacionalFil: Durán Gamba, Marta Gisela. Universidad Santo Tomás; Colombia

    Impact of Decision Rules and Non-Cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making

    Get PDF
    The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version.In group decision making (GDM), it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process (CRP) resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target

    Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors

    Get PDF
    This work was supported in part by the NSF of China under grants 71171160 and 71571124, in part by the SSEM Key Research Center at Sichuan Province under grant xq15b01, in part by the FEDER funds under grant TIN2013-40658-P, and in part by Andalusian Excellence Project under grant TIC-5991.The consensus reaching process (CRP) is a dynamic and iterative process for improving the consensus level among experts in group decision making. A large number of non-cooperative behaviors exist in the CRP. For example, some experts will express their opinions dishonestly or refuse to change their opinions to further their own interests. In this study, we propose a novel consensus framework for managing non-cooperative behaviors. In the proposed framework, a self-management mechanism to generate experts' weights dynamically is presented and then integrated into the CRP. This self-management mechanism is based on multi-attribute mutual evaluation matrices (MMEMs). During the CRP, the experts can provide and update their MMEMs regarding the experts' performances (e.g., professional skill, cooperation, and fairness), and the experts' weights are dynamically derived from the MMEMs. Detailed simulation experiments and comparison analysis are presented to justify the validity of the proposed consensus framework in managing the non-cooperative behaviors.National Natural Science Foundation of China 71171160 71571124SSEM Key Research Center at Sichuan Province xq15b01European Union (EU) TIN2013-40658-PAndalusian Excellence Project TIC-599

    Consensus Reaching with Time Constraints and Minimum Adjustments in Group with Bounded Confidence Effects

    Get PDF
    The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.In the bounded confidence model it is widely known that individuals rely on the opinions of their close friends or people with similar interests. Meanwhile, the decision maker always hopes that the opinions of individuals can reach a consensus in a required time. Therefore, with this idea in mind, this paper develops a consensus reaching model with time constraints and minimum adjustments in a group with bounded confidence effects. In the proposed consensus approach, the minimum adjustments rule is used to modify the initial opinions of individuals with bounded confidence, which can further influence the opinion evolutions of individuals to reach a consensus in a required time. The properties of the model are studied, and detailed numerical examples and comparative simulation analysis are provided to justify its feasibility

    A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes

    Get PDF
    In large-scale group decision making (GDM), non-cooperative behavior in the consensus reaching process (CRP) is not unusual. For example, some individuals might form a small alliance with the aim to refuse attempts to modify their preferences or even to move them against consensus to foster the alliance’s own interests. In this paper, we propose a novel framework based on a self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale consensus reaching processes (LCRPs). In the proposed consensus reaching framework, experts are classified into different subgroups using a clustering method, and experts provide their evaluation information, i.e., the multi-criteria mutual evaluation matrices (MCMEMs), regarding the subgroups based on subgroups’ performance (e.g., professional skills, cooperation, and fairness). The subgroups’ weights are dynamically generated from the MCMEMs, which are in turn employed to update the individual experts’ weights. This self-management mechanism in the LCRP allows penalizing the weights of the experts with non-cooperative behaviors. Detailed simulation experiments and comparison analysis are presented to verify the validity of the proposed framework for managing non-cooperative behaviors in the LCRP
    corecore