970 research outputs found
Brain-inspired conscious computing architecture
What type of artificial systems will claim to be conscious and will claim to experience qualia? The ability to comment upon physical states of a brain-like dynamical system coupled with its environment seems to be sufficient to make claims. The flow of internal states in such system, guided and limited by associative memory, is similar to the stream of consciousness. Minimal requirements for an artificial system that will claim to be conscious were given in form of specific architecture named articon. Nonverbal discrimination of the working memory states of the articon gives it the ability to experience different qualities of internal states. Analysis of the inner state flows of such a system during typical behavioral process shows that qualia are inseparable from perception and action. The role of consciousness in learning of skills, when conscious information processing is replaced by subconscious, is elucidated. Arguments confirming that phenomenal experience is a result of cognitive processes are presented. Possible philosophical objections based on the Chinese room and other arguments are discussed, but they are insufficient to refute claims articon’s claims. Conditions for genuine understanding that go beyond the Turing test are presented. Articons may fulfill such conditions and in principle the structure of their experiences may be arbitrarily close to human
Toward a formal theory for computing machines made out of whatever physics offers: extended version
Approaching limitations of digital computing technologies have spurred
research in neuromorphic and other unconventional approaches to computing. Here
we argue that if we want to systematically engineer computing systems that are
based on unconventional physical effects, we need guidance from a formal theory
that is different from the symbolic-algorithmic theory of today's computer
science textbooks. We propose a general strategy for developing such a theory,
and within that general view, a specific approach that we call "fluent
computing". In contrast to Turing, who modeled computing processes from a
top-down perspective as symbolic reasoning, we adopt the scientific paradigm of
physics and model physical computing systems bottom-up by formalizing what can
ultimately be measured in any physical substrate. This leads to an
understanding of computing as the structuring of processes, while classical
models of computing systems describe the processing of structures.Comment: 76 pages. This is an extended version of a perspective article with
the same title that will appear in Nature Communications soon after this
manuscript goes public on arxi
Universal neural field computation
Turing machines and G\"odel numbers are important pillars of the theory of
computation. Thus, any computational architecture needs to show how it could
relate to Turing machines and how stable implementations of Turing computation
are possible. In this chapter, we implement universal Turing computation in a
neural field environment. To this end, we employ the canonical symbologram
representation of a Turing machine obtained from a G\"odel encoding of its
symbolic repertoire and generalized shifts. The resulting nonlinear dynamical
automaton (NDA) is a piecewise affine-linear map acting on the unit square that
is partitioned into rectangular domains. Instead of looking at point dynamics
in phase space, we then consider functional dynamics of probability
distributions functions (p.d.f.s) over phase space. This is generally described
by a Frobenius-Perron integral transformation that can be regarded as a neural
field equation over the unit square as feature space of a dynamic field theory
(DFT). Solving the Frobenius-Perron equation yields that uniform p.d.f.s with
rectangular support are mapped onto uniform p.d.f.s with rectangular support,
again. We call the resulting representation \emph{dynamic field automaton}.Comment: 21 pages; 6 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1204.546
Visibly Pushdown Modular Games
Games on recursive game graphs can be used to reason about the control flow
of sequential programs with recursion. In games over recursive game graphs, the
most natural notion of strategy is the modular strategy, i.e., a strategy that
is local to a module and is oblivious to previous module invocations, and thus
does not depend on the context of invocation. In this work, we study for the
first time modular strategies with respect to winning conditions that can be
expressed by a pushdown automaton.
We show that such games are undecidable in general, and become decidable for
visibly pushdown automata specifications.
Our solution relies on a reduction to modular games with finite-state
automata winning conditions, which are known in the literature.
We carefully characterize the computational complexity of the considered
decision problem. In particular, we show that modular games with a universal
Buchi or co Buchi visibly pushdown winning condition are EXPTIME-complete, and
when the winning condition is given by a CARET or NWTL temporal logic formula
the problem is 2EXPTIME-complete, and it remains 2EXPTIME-hard even for simple
fragments of these logics.
As a further contribution, we present a different solution for modular games
with finite-state automata winning condition that runs faster than known
solutions for large specifications and many exits.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
- …