2 research outputs found
On the mechanisation of the logic of partial functions
PhD ThesisIt is well known that partial functions arise frequently in formal reasoning
about programs. A partial function may not yield a value for every member
of its domain. Terms that apply partial functions thus may not denote, and
coping with such terms is problematic in two-valued classical logic. A question
is raised: how can reasoning about logical formulae that can contain references
to terms that may fail to denote (partial terms) be conducted formally? Over
the years a number of approaches to coping with partial terms have been
documented. Some of these approaches attempt to stay within the realm
of two-valued classical logic, while others are based on non-classical logics.
However, as yet there is no consensus on which approach is the best one to
use. A comparison of numerous approaches to coping with partial terms is
presented based upon formal semantic definitions.
One approach to coping with partial terms that has received attention over
the years is the Logic of Partial Functions (LPF), which is the logic underlying
the Vienna Development Method. LPF is a non-classical three-valued logic
designed to cope with partial terms, where both terms and propositions may
fail to denote. As opposed to using concrete undfined values, undefinedness
is treated as a \gap", that is, the absence of a defined value. LPF is based
upon Strong Kleene logic, where the interpretations of the logical operators
are extended to cope with truth value \gaps".
Over the years a large body of research and engineering has gone into the
development of proof based tool support for two-valued classical logic. This
has created a major obstacle that affects the adoption of LPF, since such proof
support cannot be carried over directly to LPF. Presently, there is a lack of
direct proof support for LPF.
An aim of this work is to investigate the applicability of mechanised (automated)
proof support for reasoning about logical formulae that can contain
references to partial terms in LPF. The focus of the investigation is on the basic
but fundamental two-valued classical logic proof procedure: resolution and
the associated technique proof by contradiction. Advanced proof techniques
are built on the foundation that is provided by these basic fundamental proof
techniques. Looking at the impact of these basic fundamental proof techniques
in LPF is thus the essential and obvious starting point for investigating proof
support for LPF. The work highlights the issues that arise when applying
these basic techniques in LPF, and investigates the extent of the modifications needed to carry them over to LPF. This work provides the essential foundation
on which to facilitate research into the modification of advanced proof
techniques for LPF.EPSR