4,810 research outputs found
Network Neutrality: A Research Guide
The conclusion in a research handbook should emphasise the complexity of the problem than trying to claim a one-size-fits-all solution. I have categorised net neutrality into positive and negative (content discrimination) net neutrality indicating the latter as potentially harmful. Blocking content without informing customers appropriately is wrong: if it says ‘Internet service’, it should offer an open Internet (alongside walled gardens if that is expressly advertised as such). The issue of uncontrolled Internet flows versus engineered solutions is central to the question of a ‘free’ versus regulated Internet. A consumer- and citizen-orientated intervention depends on passing regulations to prevent unregulated nontransparent controls exerted over traffic via DPI equipment, whether imposed by ISPs for financial advantage or by governments eager to use this new technology to filter, censor and enforce copyright against their citizens. Unraveling the previous ISP limited liability regime risks removing the efficiency of that approach in permitting the free flow of information for economic and social advantage. These conclusions support a light-touch regulatory regime involving reporting requirements and co-regulation with, as far as is possible, market-based solutions. Solutions may be international as well as local, and international coordination of best practice and knowledge will enable national regulators to keep up with the technology ‘arms race’
The State of Network Neutrality Regulation
The Network Neutrality (NN) debate refers to the battle over the design of a regulatory framework for preserving the Internet as a public network and open innovation platform. Fueled by concerns that broadband access service providers might abuse network management to discriminate against third party providers (e.g., content or application providers), policymakers have struggled with designing rules that would protect the Internet from unreasonable network management practices. In this article, we provide an overview of the history of the debate in the U.S. and the EU and highlight the challenges that will confront network engineers designing and operating networks as the debate continues to evolve.BMBF, 16DII111, Verbundprojekt: Weizenbaum-Institut für die vernetzte Gesellschaft - Das Deutsche Internet-Institut; Teilvorhaben: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)EC/H2020/679158/EU/Resolving the Tussle in the Internet: Mapping, Architecture, and Policy Making/ResolutioNe
Survey of End-to-End Mobile Network Measurement Testbeds, Tools, and Services
Mobile (cellular) networks enable innovation, but can also stifle it and lead
to user frustration when network performance falls below expectations. As
mobile networks become the predominant method of Internet access, developer,
research, network operator, and regulatory communities have taken an increased
interest in measuring end-to-end mobile network performance to, among other
goals, minimize negative impact on application responsiveness. In this survey
we examine current approaches to end-to-end mobile network performance
measurement, diagnosis, and application prototyping. We compare available tools
and their shortcomings with respect to the needs of researchers, developers,
regulators, and the public. We intend for this survey to provide a
comprehensive view of currently active efforts and some auspicious directions
for future work in mobile network measurement and mobile application
performance evaluation.Comment: Submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials. arXiv does
not format the URL references correctly. For a correctly formatted version of
this paper go to
http://www.cs.montana.edu/mwittie/publications/Goel14Survey.pd
Net Neutrality as Global Principle for Internet Governance
This paper discusses the concept of network neutrality (NN) and explores its relevance to global Internet governance. The paper identifies three distinct ways in which the concept of network neutrality might attain a status as a globally applicable principle for Internet governance. The paper concludes that the concept of a "neutral" Internet has global applicability in a variety of contexts relevant to Internet governance
- …