7 research outputs found
A Computable Measure of Algorithmic Probability by Finite Approximations with an Application to Integer Sequences
Given the widespread use of lossless compression algorithms to approximate
algorithmic (Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity, and that lossless compression
algorithms fall short at characterizing patterns other than statistical ones
not different to entropy estimations, here we explore an alternative and
complementary approach. We study formal properties of a Levin-inspired measure
calculated from the output distribution of small Turing machines. We
introduce and justify finite approximations that have been used in some
applications as an alternative to lossless compression algorithms for
approximating algorithmic (Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity. We provide proofs of
the relevant properties of both and and compare them to Levin's
Universal Distribution. We provide error estimations of with respect to
. Finally, we present an application to integer sequences from the Online
Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences which suggests that our AP-based measures may
characterize non-statistical patterns, and we report interesting correlations
with textual, function and program description lengths of the said sequences.Comment: As accepted by the journal Complexity (Wiley/Hindawi
Algorithmic Complexity for Short Binary Strings Applied to Psychology: A Primer
Since human randomness production has been studied and widely used to assess
executive functions (especially inhibition), many measures have been suggested
to assess the degree to which a sequence is random-like. However, each of them
focuses on one feature of randomness, leading authors to have to use multiple
measures. Here we describe and advocate for the use of the accepted universal
measure for randomness based on algorithmic complexity, by means of a novel
previously presented technique using the the definition of algorithmic
probability. A re-analysis of the classical Radio Zenith data in the light of
the proposed measure and methodology is provided as a study case of an
application.Comment: To appear in Behavior Research Method
Correspondence and Independence of Numerical Evaluations of Algorithmic Information Measures
We show that real-value approximations of Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity K(s) using the algorithmic coding theorem, as calculated from the output frequency of a large set of small deterministic Turing machines with up to 5 states (and 2 symbols), is consistent with the number of instructions used by the Turing machines producing s, which in turn is consistent with strict integer-value program-size complexity (based on our knowledge of the smallest machine in terms of the number of instructions used). We also show that neither K(s) nor the number of instructions used manifests any correlation with Bennett's Logical Depth LD(s), other than what's predicted by the theory (shallow and non-random strings have low complexity under both measures). The agreement between the theory and the numerical calculations shows that despite the undecidability of these theoretical measures, the rate of convergence of approximations is stable enough to devise some applications. We announce a Beta version of an Online Algorithmic Complexity Calculator (OACC) implementing these methods
Coding-theorem Like Behaviour and Emergence of the Universal Distribution from Resource-bounded Algorithmic Probability
Previously referred to as `miraculous' in the scientific literature because
of its powerful properties and its wide application as optimal solution to the
problem of induction/inference, (approximations to) Algorithmic Probability
(AP) and the associated Universal Distribution are (or should be) of the
greatest importance in science. Here we investigate the emergence, the rates of
emergence and convergence, and the Coding-theorem like behaviour of AP in
Turing-subuniversal models of computation. We investigate empirical
distributions of computing models in the Chomsky hierarchy. We introduce
measures of algorithmic probability and algorithmic complexity based upon
resource-bounded computation, in contrast to previously thoroughly investigated
distributions produced from the output distribution of Turing machines. This
approach allows for numerical approximations to algorithmic
(Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity-based estimations at each of the levels of a
computational hierarchy. We demonstrate that all these estimations are
correlated in rank and that they converge both in rank and values as a function
of computational power, despite fundamental differences between computational
models. In the context of natural processes that operate below the Turing
universal level because of finite resources and physical degradation, the
investigation of natural biases stemming from algorithmic rules may shed light
on the distribution of outcomes. We show that up to 60\% of the
simplicity/complexity bias in distributions produced even by the weakest of the
computational models can be accounted for by Algorithmic Probability in its
approximation to the Universal Distribution.Comment: 27 pages main text, 39 pages including supplement. Online complexity
calculator: http://complexitycalculator.com