63 research outputs found

    QBOAirbase:The European Air Quality Database as an RDF Cube

    Get PDF

    Aspects of Semantic ETL

    Get PDF

    Aspects of semantic ETL

    Get PDF
    Tesi en modalitat de cotutela: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya i Aalborg UniversitetBusiness Intelligence tools support making better business decisions by analyzing available organizational data. Data Warehouses (DWs), typically structured with the Multidimensional (MD) model, are used to store data from different internal and external sources processed using Extract-Transformation-Load (ETL) processes. On-Line analytical Processing (OLAP) queries are applied on DWs to derive important business-critical knowledge. DW and OLAP technologies perform efficiently when they are applied on data that are static in nature and well organized in structure. Nowadays, Semantic Web technologies and the Linked Data principles inspire organizations to publish their semantic data, which allow machines to understand the meaning of data, using the Resource Description Framework (RDF) model. In addition to traditional (non-semantic) data sources, the incorporation of semantic data sources into a DW raises the additional challenges of schema derivation, semantic heterogeneity, and schema and data management model over traditional ETL tools. Furthermore, most SW data provided by business, academic and governmental organizations include facts and figures, which raise new requirements for BI tools to enable OLAP-like analyses over those semantic (RDF) data. In this thesis, we 1) propose a layer-based ETL framework for handling diverse semantic and non-semantic data sources by addressing the challenges mentioned above, 2) propose a set of high-level ETL constructs for processing semantic data, 3) implement appropriate environments (both programmable and GUI) to facilitate ETL processes and evaluate the proposed solutions. Our ETL framework is a semantic ETL framework because it integrates data semantically. We propose SETL, a unified framework for semantic ETL. The framework is divided into three layers: the Definition Layer, ETL Layer, and Data Warehouse Layer. In the Definition Layer, the semantic DW (SDW) schema, sources, and the mappings among the sources and the target are defined. In the ETL Layer, ETL processes to populate the SDW from sources are designed. The Data Warehouse Layer manages the storage of transformed semantic data. The framework supports the inclusion of semantic (RDF) data in DWs in addition to relational data. It allows users to define an ontology of a DW and annotate it with MD constructs (such as dimensions, cubes, levels, etc.) using the Data Cube for OLAP (QB4OLAP) vocabulary. It supports traditional transformation operations and provides a method to generate semantic data from the source data according to the semantics encoded in the ontology. It also provides a method to connect internal SDW data with external knowledge bases. On top of SETL, we propose SETLCONSTUCT where we define a set of high-level ETL tasks/operations to process semantic data sources. We divide the integration process into two layers: the Definition Layer and Execution Layer. The Definition Layer includes two tasks that allow DW designers to define target (SDW) schemas and the mappings between (intermediate) sources and the (intermediate) target. To create mappings among the sources and target constructs, we provide a mapping vocabulary called S2TMAP. Different from other ETL tools, we propose a new paradigm: we characterize the ETL flow transformations at the Definition Layer instead of independently within each ETL operation (in the Execution Layer). This way, the designer has an overall view of the process, which generates metadata (the mapping file) that the ETL operators will read and parametrize themselves with automatically. In the Execution Layer, we propose a set of high-level ETL operations to process semantic data sources. Finally, we develop a GUI-based semantic BI system SETLBI to define, process, integrate, and query semantic and non-semantic data. In addition to the Definition Layer and the ETL Layer, SETLBI has the OLAP Layer, which provides an interactive interface to enable OLAP analysis over the semantic DWLes eines d’Intel·ligència Empresarial (BI), conegudes en anglès com Business Intelligence, donen suport a la millora de la presa de decisions empresarials mitjançant l’anàlisi de les dades de l’organització disponibles. Els magatzems de dades, o data warehouse, (DWs), típicament estructurats seguint el model Multidimensional (MD), s’utilitzen per emmagatzemar dades de diferents fonts, tant internes com externes, processades mitjançant processos Extract- Transformation-Load (ETL). Les consultes de processament analític en línia (OLAP) s’apliquen als DW per extraure coneixement crític en l’àmbit empresarial. Els DW i les tecnologies OLAP funcionen de manera eficient quan s’apliquen sobre dades de natura estàtica i ben estructurades. Avui en dia, les tecnologies de la Web Semàntica (SW) i els principis Linked Data (LD) inspiren les organitzacions per publicar les seves dades en formats semàntics, que permeten que les màquines entenguin el significat de les dades, mitjançant el llenguatge de descripció de recursos (RDF). Una de les raons per les quals les dades semàntiques han tingut tant d’èxit és que es poden gestionar i fer que estiguin disponibles per tercers amb poc esforç, i no depenen d’esquemes de dades sofisticats. A més de les fonts de dades tradicionals (no semàntiques), la incorporació de fonts de dades semàntiques en un DW planteja reptes addicionals tals com derivar-hi esquema, l’heterogeneïtat semàntica i la representació de l’esquema i les dades a través d’eines d’ETL. A més, la majoria de dades SW proporcionades per empreses, organitzacions acadèmiques o governamentals inclouen fets i figures que representen nous reptes per les eines de BI per tal d’habilitar l’anàlisi OLAP sobre dades semàntiques (RDF). En aquesta tesi, 1) proposem un marc ETL basat en capes per a la gestió de diverses fonts de dades semàntiques i no semàntiques i adreçant els reptes esmentats anteriorment, 2) proposem un conjunt d’operacions ETL per processar dades semàntiques, i 3) la creació d’entorns apropiats de desenvolupament (programàtics i GUIs) per facilitar la creació i gestió de DW i processos ETL semàntics, així com avaluar les solucions proposades. El nostre marc ETL és un marc ETL semàntic perquè Es capaç de considerar e integrar dades de forma semàntica. Els següents paràgrafs elaboren sobre aquests contribucions. Proposem SETL, un marc unificat per a ETL semàntic. El marc es divideix en tres capes: la capa de definició, la capa ETL i la capa DW. A la capa de definició, es defineixen l’esquema del DW semàntic (SDW), les fonts i els mappings entre les fonts i l’esquema del DW. A la capa ETL, es dissenyen processos ETL per popular el SDW a partir de fonts. A la capa DW, es gestiona l’emmagatzematge de les dades semàntiques transformades. El nostre marc dóna suport a la inclusió de dades semàntiques (RDF) en DWs, a més de dades relacionals. Així, permet als usuaris definir una ontologia d’un DW i anotar-la amb construccions MD (com ara dimensions, cubs, nivells, etc.) utilitzant el vocabulari Data Cube for OLAP (QB4OLAP). També admet operacions de transformació tradicionals i proporciona un mètode per generar semàntica de les dades d’origen segons la semàntica codificada al document ontologia. També proporciona un mètode per connectar l’SDW amb bases de coneixement externes. Per tant, crea una base de coneixement, composta per un ontologia i les seves instàncies, on les dades estan connectades semànticament amb altres dades externes / internes. Per fer-ho, desenvolupem un mètode programàtic, basat en Python, d’alt nivell, per realitzar les tasques esmentades anteriorment. S’ha portat a terme un experiment complet d’avaluació comparant SETL amb una solució elaborada amb eines tradicional (que requereixen molta més codificació). Com a cas d’ús, hem emprat el Danish Agricultural dataset, i els resultats mostren que SETL proporciona un millor rendiment, millora la productivitat del programador i la qualitat de la base de coneixement. La comparació entre SETL i Pentaho Data Integration (PDI) mostra que SETL és un 13,5% més ràpid que PDI. A més de ser més ràpid que PDI, tracta les dades semàntiques com a ciutadans de primera classe, mentre que PDI no conté operadors específics per a dades semàntiques. A sobre de SETL, proposem SETLCONSTUCT on definim un conjunt de tasques d’alt nivell / operacions ETL per processar fonts de dades semàntiques i orientades a encapsular i facilitar la creació de l’ETL semàntic. Dividim el procés d’integració en dues capes: la capa de definició i la capa d’execució. La capa de definició inclou dues tasques que permeten definir als dissenyadors de DW esquemes destí (SDW) i mappings entre fonts (o resultats intermedis) i l’SDW (potencialment, altres resultats intermedis). Per crear mappings entre les fonts i el SDW, proporcionem un vocabulari de mapping anomenat Source-To-Target Mapping (S2TMAP). A diferència d’altres eines ETL, proposem un nou paradigma: les transformacions del flux ETL es caracteritzen a la capa de definició, i no de forma independent dins de cada operació ETL (a la capa d’execució). Aquest nou paradigma permet al dissenyador tenir una visió global del procés, que genera metadades (el fitxer de mapping) que els operadors ETL individuals llegiran i es parametritzaran automàticament. A la capa d’execució proposem un conjunt d’operacions ETL d’alt nivell per processar fonts de dades semàntiques. A més de la neteja, la unió i la transformació per dades semàntiques, proposem operacions per generar semàntica multidimensional i actualitzar el SDW per reflectir els canvis en les fonts. A més, ampliem SETLCONSTRUCT per permetre la generació automàtica de flux d’execució ETL (l’anomenem SETLAUTO). Finalment, proporcionem una àmplia avaluació per comparar la productivitat, el temps de desenvolupament i el rendiment de SETLCONSTRUCT i SETLAUTO amb el marc anterior SETL. L’avaluació demostra que SETLCONSTRUCT millora considerablement sobre SETL en termes de productivitat, temps de desenvolupament i rendiment. L’avaluació mostra que 1) SETLCONSTRUCT utilitza un 92% menys de caràcters mecanografiats (NOTC) que SETL, i SETLAUTO redueix encara més el nombre de conceptes usats (NOUC) un altre 25%; 2) utilitzant SETLCONSTRUCT, el temps de desenvolupament es redueix gairebé a la meitat en comparació amb SETL, i es redueix un altre 27 % mitjançant SETLAUTO; 3) SETLCONSTRUCT es escalable i té un rendiment similar en comparació amb SETL. Finalment, desenvolupem un sistema de BI semàntic basat en GUI SETLBI per definir, processar, integrar i consultar dades semàntiques i no semàntiques. A més de la capa de definició i de la capa ETL, SETLBI té una capa OLAP, que proporciona una interfície interactiva per permetre l’anàlisi OLAP d’autoservei sobre el DW semàntic. Cada capa està composada per un conjunt d’operacions / tasques. Per formalitzar les connexions intra i inter-capes dels components de cada capa, emprem una ontologia. La capa ETL amplia l’execució de la capa de SETLCONSTUCT afegint operacions per processar fonts de dades no semàntiques. Per últim, demostrem el sistema final mitjançant el cens de la població de Bangladesh (2011). La solució final d’aquesta tesi és l’eina SETLBI . SETLBI facilita (1) als dissenyadors del DW amb pocs / sense coneixements de SW, integrar semànticament les dades (semàntiques o no) i analitzar-les emprant OLAP, i (2) als usuaris de la SW els permet definir vistes sobre dades semàntiques, integrar-les amb fonts no semàntiques, i visualitzar-les segons el model MD i fer anàlisi OLAP. A més, els usuaris SW poden enriquir l’esquema SDW generat amb construccions RDFS / OWL. Prenent aquest marc com a punt de partida, els investigadors poden emprar-lo per a crear SDWs de forma interactiva i automàtica. Aquest projecte crea un pont entre les tecnologies BI i SW, i obre la porta a altres oportunitats de recerca com desenvolupar tècniques de DW i ETL comprensibles per les màquines.(Danskere) Business Intelligence (BI) værktøjer understøtter at tage bedre forretningsbeslutninger, ved at analysere tilgængelige organisatoriske data. Data Warehouses (DWs), typisk konstrueret med den Multidimensionelle (MD) model, bruges til at lagre data fra forskellige interne og eksterne kilder, der behandles ved hjælp af Extract-Transformation-Load (ETL) processer. On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP) forespørgsler anvendes på DWs for at udlede vigtig forretningskritisk viden. DW og OLAP-teknologier fungerer effektivt, når de anvendes på data, som er statiske af natur og velorganiseret i struktur. I dag inspirerer Semantic Web (SW) teknologier og Linked Data (LD) principper organisationer til at offentliggøre deres semantiske data, som tillader maskiner at forstå betydningen af denne, ved hjælp af Resource Description Framework (RDF) modellen. En af grundene til, at semantiske data er blevet succesfuldt, er at styringen og udgivelsen af af dataene er nemt, og ikke er afhængigt af et sofistikeret skema. Ud over problemer ved overførslen af traditionelle (ikke-semantiske) databaser til DWs, opstår yderligere udfordringer ved overførslen af semantiske databaser, såsom skema nedarvning, semantisk heterogenitet samt skemaet for data repræsentation over traditionelle ETL værktøjer. På den anden side udgør en stor del af den semantiske data der bliver offentliggjort af virksomheder, akademikere samt regeringer, af figurer og fakta, der igen giver nye problemstillinger og krav til BI værktøjer, for at gøre OLAP lignende analyser over de semantiske data mulige. I denne afhandling gør vi følgende: 1) foreslår et lag-baseret ETL framework til at håndterer multiple semantiske og ikke-semantiske datakilder, ved at svare på udfordringerne nævnt herover, 2) foreslår en mængde af ETL operationer til at behandle semantisk data, 3) implementerer passende miljøer (både programmerbare samt grafiske brugergrænseflader), for at lette ETL processer og evaluere den foreslåede løsning. Vores ETL framework er et semantisk ETL framework, fordi det integrerer data semantisk. Den følgende sektion forklarer vores bidrag. Vi foreslår SETL, et samlet framework for semantisk ETL. Frameworket er splittet i tre lag: et definitions-lag, et ETL-lag, og et DW-lag. Det semanvii tiske DW (SWD) skema, datakilder, samt sammenhængen mellem datakilder og deres mål, er defineret i definitions-laget. I ETL-laget designes ETLprocesser til at udfylde SDW fra datakilderne. DW-laget administrerer lagring af transformerede semantiske data. Frameworket understøtter inkluderingen af semantiske (RDF) data i DWs ud over relationelle data. Det giver brugerne mulighed for at definere en ontologi for et DW og annotere med MD-konstruktioner (såsom dimensioner, kuber, niveauer osv.) ved hjælp af Data Cube til OLAP (QB4OLAP) ordforrådet. Det understøtter traditionelle transformations operationer, og giver en metode til at generere semantiske data fra de oprindelige data, i henhold til semantikken indkodet i ontologien. Det muliggør også en metode til at forbinde interne SDW data med eksterne vidensbaser. Herved skaber det en vidensbase, der er sammensat af en ontologi og dets instanser, hvor data er semantisk forbundet med andre eksterne / interne data. Vi udvikler et høj niveau Python-baseret programmerbart framework for at udføre de ovennævnte opgaver. En omfattende eksperimentel evaluering, der sammenligner SETL med en traditionel løsning (hvilket krævede meget manuel kodning), om brugen af danske landbrugsog forretnings datasæt, viser at SETL præsterer bedre, programmør produktivitet og vidensbase kvalitet. Sammenligningen mellem SETL og Pentaho Data Integration (PDI) ved behandling af en semantisk kilde viser, at SETL er 13,5% hurtigere end PDI. Udover SETL, foreslår vi SETLCONSTRUCT hvor vi definerer et sæt ETLoperationer på højt niveau til behandling af semantiske datakilder. Vi deler integrationsprocessen i to lag: Definitions-lag og eksekverings-lag. Definitionslaget indeholder to opgaver, der giver DW designere muligheden for at definere (SDW) skemaer, og kortlægningerne mellem kilder og målet. For at oprette kortlægning mellem kilderne og målene, leverer vi et kortlægnings ordforråd kaldet Source-to-Target Mapping (S2TMAP). Forskelligt fra andre ETL-værktøjer foreslår vi et nyt paradigme: vi karakteriserer ETLflowtransformationerne i definitions-laget i stedet for uafhængigt inden for hver ETL-operation (i eksekverings-laget). På denne måde har designeren et overblik over processen, som genererer metadata (kortlægningsfilen), som ETL operatørerne vil læse og parametrisere automatisk. I eksekverings-laget foreslår vi en mængde høj niveau ETL-operationer til at behandle semantiske datakilder. Udover rensning, sammenføjning og datatypebaseret transformationer af semantiske data, foreslår vi operationer til at generere multidimensionel semantik på data-niveau og operationer til at opdatere et SDW for at afspejle ændringer i kilde-dataen. Derudover udvider vi SETLCONSTRUCT for at muliggøre automatisk ETL-eksekveringsstrømgenerering (vi kalder det SETLAUTO). Endelig leverer vi en omfattende evaluering for at sammenligne produktivitet, udviklingstid og ydeevne for scon og SETLAUTO med den tidligere ramme SETL. Evalueringen viser, at SETLCONSTRUCT forbedres markant i forhold til SETL med hensyn til produktivitet, udviklingstid og ydeevne. Evalueringen viser, at 1) SETLCONSTRUCT bruger 92% færre antal indtastede tegn (NOTC) end SETL, og SETLAUTO reducerer antallet af brugte begreber (NOUC) yderligere med 25%; 2) ved at bruge SETLCONSTRUCT, er udviklingstiden næsten halveret sammenlignet med SETL, og skæres med yderligere 27% ved hjælp af SETLAUTO; 3) SETLCONSTRUCT er skalerbar og har lignende ydelse sammenlignet med SETL. Til slut udvikler vi et GUI-baseret semantisk BI system SETLBI for at definere, processere, integrere og lave forespørgsler på semantiske og ikkesemantiske data. Ud over definitions-laget og ETL-laget, har SETLBI et OLAP-lag, som giver en interaktiv grænseflade for at muliggøre selvbetjenings OLAP analyser over det semantiske DW. Hvert lag er sammensat af en mængde operationer/opgaver. Vi udarbejder en ontologi til at formalisere intra-og ekstra-lags forbindelserne mellem komponenterne og lagene. ETLlaget udvider eksekverings-laget af SETLCONSTUCT ved at tilføje operationer til at behandle ikke-semantiske datakilder. Vi demonstrerer systemet ved hjælp af Bangladesh population census 2011 datasættet. Sammenfatningen af denne afhandling er BI-værktøjet SETLBI . SETLBI fremmer (1) DW-designere med ringe / ingen SW-viden til semantisk at integrere semantiske og / eller ikke-semantiske data og analysere det i OLAP stil, og (2) SW brugere med grundlæggende MD-baggrund til at definere MDvisninger over semantiske data, der aktiverer OLAP-lignende analyse. Derudover kan SW-brugere berige det genererede SDW-skema med RDFS / OWLkonstruktioner. Med udgangspunkt i frameworket som et grundlag kan forskere sigte mod at udvikle yderligere interaktive og automatiske integrationsrammer for SDW. Dette projekt bygger bro mellem de traditionelle BIteknologier og SW-teknologier, som igen vil åbne døren for yderligere forskningsmuligheder som at udvikle maskinforståelige ETL og lagerteknikker.Postprint (published version

    SAFE: SPARQL Federation over RDF Data Cubes with Access Control

    Full text link

    TrieDF: Efficient In-memory Indexing for Metadata-augmented RDF

    Get PDF
    International audienceMetadata, such as provenance, versioning, temporal annotations, etc., is vital for the maintenance of RDF data. Despite its importance in the RDF ecosystem, support for metadata-augmented RDF remains limited. Some solutions focus on particular annotation types but no approach so far implements arbitrary levels of metadata in an application-agnostic way. We take a step to tackle this limitation and propose an in-memory tuple store architecture that can handle RDF data augmented with any type of metadata. Our approach, called TrieDF, builds upon the notion of tries to store the indexes and the dictionary of a metadataaugmented RDF dataset. Our experimental evaluation on three use cases shows that TrieDF outperforms state-of-the-art in-memory solutions for RDF in terms of main memory usage and retrieval time, while remaining application-agnostic

    Optimizing Analytical Queries over Semantic Web Sources

    Get PDF

    Visualizing Statistical Linked Knowledge for Decision Support

    Get PDF
    In a global and interconnected economy, decision makers often need to consider information from various domains. A tourism destination manager, for example, has to correlate tourist behavior with financial and environmental indicators to allocate funds for strategic long-term investments. Statistical data underpins a broad range of such cross-domain decision tasks. A variety of statistical datasets are available as Linked Open Data, often incorporated into visual analytics solutions to support decision making. What are the principles, architectures, workflows and implementation design patterns that should be followed for building such visual cross-domain decision support systems. This article introduces a methodology to integrate and visualize cross-domain statistical data sources by applying selected RDF Data Cube (QB) principles. A visual dashboard built according to this methodology is presented and evaluated in the context of two use cases in the tourism and telecommunications domains

    High-level ETL for semantic data warehouses

    Get PDF
    The popularity of the Semantic Web (SW) encourages organizations to organize and publish semantic data using the RDF model. This growth poses new requirements to Business Intelligence (BI) technologies to enable On-Line Analytical Processing (OLAP)-like analysis over semantic data. The incorporation of semantic data into a Data Warehouse (DW) is not supported by the traditional Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) tools because they do not consider semantic issues in the integration process. In this paper, we propose a layer-based integration process and a set of high-level RDF-based ETL constructs required to define, map, extract, process, transform, integrate, update, and load (multidimensional) semantic data. Different to other ETL tools, we automate the ETL data flows by creating metadata at the schema level. Therefore, it relieves ETL developers from the burden of manual mapping at the ETL operation level. We create a prototype, named Semantic ETL Construct (SETLCONSTRUCT), based on the innovative ETL constructs proposed here. To evaluate SETLCONSTRUCT, we create a multidimensional semantic DW by integrating a Danish Business dataset and an EU Subsidy dataset using it and compare it with the previous programmable framework SETLPROG in terms of productivity, development time and performance. The evaluation shows that 1) SETLCONSTRUCT uses 92% fewer Number of Typed Characters (NOTC) than SETLPROG, and SETLAUTO (the extension of SETLCONSTRUCT for generating ETL execution flow automatically) further reduces the Number of Used Concepts (NOUC) by another 25%; 2) using SETLCONSTRUCT, the development time is almost cut in half compared to SETLPROG, and is cut by another 27% using SETLAUTO; 3) SETLCONSTRUCT is scalable and has similar performance compared to SETLPROG.This research is partially funded by the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Information Technologies for Business Intelligence (EM IT4BI-DC), the Poul Due Jensen Foundation, and the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) under grant agreement no. DFF-8048-00051B.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Efficient Source Selection For SPARQL Endpoint Query Federation

    Get PDF
    The Web of Data has grown enormously over the last years. Currently, it comprises a large compendium of linked and distributed datasets from multiple domains. Due to the decentralised architecture of the Web of Data, several of these datasets contain complementary data. Running complex queries on this compendium thus often requires accessing data from different data sources within one query. The abundance of datasets and the need for running complex query has thus motivated a considerable body of work on SPARQL query federation systems, the dedicated means to access data distributed over the Web of Data. This thesis addresses two key areas of federated SPARQL query processing: (1) efficient source selection, and (2) comprehensive SPARQL benchmarks to test and ranked federated SPARQL engines as well as triple stores. Efficient Source Selection: Efficient source selection is one of the most important optimization steps in federated SPARQL query processing. An overestimation of query relevant data sources increases the network traffic, result in irrelevant intermediate results, and can significantly affect the overall query processing time. Previous works have focused on generating optimized query execution plans for fast result retrieval. However, devising source selection approaches beyond triple pattern-wise source selection has not received much attention. Similarly, only little attention has been paid to the effect of duplicated data on federated querying. This thesis presents HiBISCuS and TBSS, novel hypergraph-based source selection approaches, and DAW, a duplicate-aware source selection approach to federated querying over the Web of Data. Each of these approaches can be combined directly with existing SPARQL query federation engines to achieve the same recall while querying fewer data sources. We combined the three (HiBISCuS, DAW, and TBSS) source selections approaches with query rewriting to form a complete SPARQL query federation engine named Quetsal. Furthermore, we present TopFed, a Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) tailored federated query processing engine that exploits the data distribution to perform intelligent source selection while querying over large TCGA SPARQL endpoints. Finally, we address the issue of rights managements and privacy while accessing sensitive resources. To this end, we present SAFE: a global source selection approach that enables decentralised, policy-aware access to sensitive clinical information represented as distributed RDF Data Cubes. Comprehensive SPARQL Benchmarks: Benchmarking is indispensable when aiming to assess technologies with respect to their suitability for given tasks. While several benchmarks and benchmark generation frameworks have been developed to evaluate federated SPARQL engines and triple stores, they mostly provide a one-fits-all solution to the benchmarking problem. This approach to benchmarking is however unsuitable to evaluate the performance of a triple store for a given application with particular requirements. The fitness of current SPARQL query federation approaches for real applications is difficult to evaluate with current benchmarks as current benchmarks are either synthetic or too small in size and complexity. Furthermore, state-of-the-art federated SPARQL benchmarks mostly focused on a single performance criterion, i.e., the overall query runtime. Thus, they cannot provide a fine-grained evaluation of the systems. We address these drawbacks by presenting FEASIBLE, an automatic approach for the generation of benchmarks out of the query history of applications, i.e., query logs and LargeRDFBench, a billion-triple benchmark for SPARQL query federation which encompasses real data as well as real queries pertaining to real bio-medical use cases. Our evaluation results show that HiBISCuS, TBSS, TopFed, DAW, and SAFE all can significantly reduce the total number of sources selected and thus improve the overall query performance. In particular, TBSS is the first source selection approach to remain under 5% overall relevant sources overestimation. Quetsal has reduced the number of sources selected (without losing recall), the source selection time as well as the overall query runtime as compared to state-of-the-art federation engines. The LargeRDFBench evaluation results suggests that the performance of current SPARQL query federation systems on simple queries does not reflect the systems\\\'' performance on more complex queries. Moreover, current federation systems seem unable to deal with many of the challenges that await them in the age of Big Data. Finally, the FEASIBLE\\\''s evaluation results shows that it generates better sample queries than the state-of-the-art. In addition, the better query selection and the larger set of query types used lead to triple store rankings which partly differ from the rankings generated by previous works
    • …
    corecore