8,037 research outputs found

    Total 2-domination of proper interval graphs

    Get PDF
    A set of vertices W of a graph G is a total k-dominating set when every vertex of G has at least k neighbors in W. In a recent article, Chiarelli et al. (2019) prove that a total k-dominating set can be computed in O(n3k) time when G is a proper interval graph with n vertices and m edges. In this note we reduce the time complexity to O(m) for k=2.Fil: Soulignac, Francisco Juan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Computación; Argentin

    Total Domination, Separated Clusters, CD-Coloring: Algorithms and Hardness

    Full text link
    Domination and coloring are two classic problems in graph theory. The major focus of this paper is the CD-COLORING problem which combines the flavours of domination and colouring. Let GG be an undirected graph. A proper vertex coloring of GG is a cdcoloringcd-coloring if each color class has a dominating vertex in GG. The minimum integer kk for which there exists a cdcoloringcd-coloring of GG using kk colors is called the cd-chromatic number, χcd(G)\chi_{cd}(G). A set SV(G)S\subseteq V(G) is a total dominating set if any vertex in GG has a neighbor in SS. The total domination number, γt(G)\gamma_t(G) of GG is the minimum integer kk such that GG has a total dominating set of size kk. A set SV(G)S\subseteq V(G) is a separatedclusterseparated-cluster if no two vertices in SS lie at a distance 2 in GG. The separated-cluster number, ωs(G)\omega_s(G), of GG is the maximum integer kk such that GG has a separated-cluster of size kk. In this paper, first we explore the connection between CD-COLORING and TOTAL DOMINATION. We prove that CD-COLORING and TOTAL DOMINATION are NP-Complete on triangle-free dd-regular graphs for each fixed integer d3d\geq 3. We also study the relationship between the parameters χcd(G)\chi_{cd}(G) and ωs(G)\omega_s(G). Analogous to the well-known notion of `perfectness', here we introduce the notion of `cd-perfectness'. We prove a sufficient condition for a graph GG to be cd-perfect (i.e. χcd(H)=ωs(H)\chi_{cd}(H)= \omega_s(H), for any induced subgraph HH of GG) which is also necessary for certain graph classes (like triangle-free graphs). Here, we propose a generalized framework via which we obtain several exciting consequences in the algorithmic complexities of special graph classes. In addition, we settle an open problem by showing that the SEPARATED-CLUSTER is polynomially solvable for interval graphs

    Algorithmic aspects of disjunctive domination in graphs

    Full text link
    For a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a set DVD\subseteq V is called a \emph{disjunctive dominating set} of GG if for every vertex vVDv\in V\setminus D, vv is either adjacent to a vertex of DD or has at least two vertices in DD at distance 22 from it. The cardinality of a minimum disjunctive dominating set of GG is called the \emph{disjunctive domination number} of graph GG, and is denoted by γ2d(G)\gamma_{2}^{d}(G). The \textsc{Minimum Disjunctive Domination Problem} (MDDP) is to find a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality γ2d(G)\gamma_{2}^{d}(G). Given a positive integer kk and a graph GG, the \textsc{Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem} (DDDP) is to decide whether GG has a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most kk. In this article, we first propose a linear time algorithm for MDDP in proper interval graphs. Next we tighten the NP-completeness of DDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a (ln(Δ2+Δ+2)+1)(\ln(\Delta^{2}+\Delta+2)+1)-approximation algorithm for MDDP in general graphs and prove that MDDP can not be approximated within (1ϵ)ln(V)(1-\epsilon) \ln(|V|) for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 unless NP \subseteq DTIME(VO(loglogV))(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)}). Finally, we show that MDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 33

    Rainbow domination and related problems on some classes of perfect graphs

    Full text link
    Let kNk \in \mathbb{N} and let GG be a graph. A function f:V(G)2[k]f: V(G) \rightarrow 2^{[k]} is a rainbow function if, for every vertex xx with f(x)=f(x)=\emptyset, f(N(x))=[k]f(N(x)) =[k]. The rainbow domination number γkr(G)\gamma_{kr}(G) is the minimum of xV(G)f(x)\sum_{x \in V(G)} |f(x)| over all rainbow functions. We investigate the rainbow domination problem for some classes of perfect graphs
    corecore