SARA: Self-Aware Resource Allocation for Heterogeneous MPSoCs

In modern heterogeneous MPSoCs, the management of shared memory resources is crucial in delivering end-to-end QoS. Previous frameworks have either focused on singular QoS targets or the allocation of partitionable resources among CPU applications at relatively slow timescales. However, heterogeneous MPSoCs typically require instant response from the memory system where most resources cannot be partitioned. Moreover, the health of different cores in a heterogeneous MPSoC is often measured by diverse performance objectives. In this work, we propose a Self-Aware Resource Allocation (SARA) framework for heterogeneous MPSoCs. Priority-based adaptation allows cores to use different target performance and self-monitor their own intrinsic health. In response, the system allocates non-partitionable resources based on priorities. The proposed framework meets a diverse range of QoS demands from heterogeneous cores.Comment: Accepted by the 55th annual Design Automation Conference 2018 (DAC'18

Improving the Performance and Energy Efficiency of GPGPU Computing through Adaptive Cache and Memory Management Techniques

Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAs the performance and energy efficiency requirement of GPGPUs have risen, memory management techniques of GPGPUs have improved to meet the requirements by employing hardware caches and utilizing heterogeneous memory. These techniques can improve GPGPUs by providing lower latency and higher bandwidth of the memory. However, these methods do not always guarantee improved performance and energy efficiency due to the small cache size and heterogeneity of the memory nodes. While prior works have proposed various techniques to address this issue, relatively little work has been done to investigate holistic support for memory management techniques. In this dissertation, we analyze performance pathologies and propose various techniques to improve memory management techniques. First, we investigate the effectiveness of advanced cache indexing (ACI) for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Specifically, we discuss the designs of various static and adaptive cache indexing schemes and present implementation for GPGPUs. We then quantify and analyze the effectiveness of the ACI schemes based on a cycle-accurate GPGPU simulator. Our quantitative evaluation shows that ACI schemes achieve significant performance and energy-efficiency gains over baseline conventional indexing scheme. We also analyze the performance sensitivity of ACI to key architectural parameters (i.e., capacity, associativity, and ICN bandwidth) and the cache indexing latency. We also demonstrate that ACI continues to achieve high performance in various settings. Second, we propose IACM, integrated adaptive cache management for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Based on the performance pathology analysis of GPGPUs, we integrate state-of-the-art adaptive cache management techniques (i.e., cache indexing, bypassing, and warp limiting) in a unified architectural framework to eliminate performance pathologies. Our quantitative evaluation demonstrates that IACM significantly improves the performance and energy efficiency of various GPGPU workloads over the baseline architecture (i.e., 98.1% and 61.9% on average, respectively) and achieves considerably higher performance than the state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 361.4% at maximum and 7.7% on average). Furthermore, IACM delivers significant performance and energy efficiency gains over the baseline GPGPU architecture even when enhanced with advanced architectural technologies (e.g., higher capacity, associativity). Third, we propose bandwidth- and latency-aware page placement (BLPP) for GPGPUs with heterogeneous memory. BLPP analyzes the characteristics of a application and determines the optimal page allocation ratio between the GPU and CPU memory. Based on the optimal page allocation ratio, BLPP dynamically allocate pages across the heterogeneous memory nodes. Our experimental results show that BLPP considerably outperforms the baseline and state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 13.4% and 16.7%) and performs similar to the static-best version (i.e., 1.2% difference), which requires extensive offline profiling.clos