How to stop time stopping

Zeno-timelocks constitute a challenge for the formal verification of timed automata: they are difficult to detect, and the verification of most properties (e.g., safety) is only correct for timelock-free models. Some time ago, Tripakis proposed a syntactic check on the structure of timed automata: If a certain condition (called strong non-zenoness) is met by all the loops in a given automaton, then zeno-timelocks are guaranteed not to occur. Checking for strong non-zenoness is efficient, and compositional (if all components in a network of automata are strongly non-zeno, then the network is free from zeno-timelocks). Strong non-zenoness, however, is sufficient-only: There exist non-zeno specifications which are not strongly non-zeno. A TCTL formula is known that represents a sufficient-and-necessary condition for non-zenoness; unfortunately, this formula requires a demanding model-checking algorithm, and not all model-checkers are able to express it. In addition, this algorithm provides only limited diagnostic information. Here we propose a number of alternative solutions. First, we show that the compositional application of strong non-zenoness can be weakened: Some networks can be guaranteed to be free from Zeno-timelocks, even if not every component is strongly non-zeno. Secondly, we present new syntactic, sufficient-only conditions that complement strong non-zenoness. Finally, we describe a sufficient-and-necessary condition that only requires a simple form of reachability analysis. Furthermore, our conditions identify the cause of zeno-timelocks directly on the model, in the form of unsafe loops. We also comment on a tool that we have developed, which implements the syntactic checks on Uppaal models. The tool is also able to derive, from those unsafe loops in a given automaton (in general, an Uppaal model representing a product automaton of a given network), the reachability formulas that characterise the occurrence of zeno-timelocks. A modified version of the CSMA/CD protocol is used as a case-study

Verification of real-time systems: improving tool support

We address a number of limitations of Timed Automata and real-time model-checkers, which undermine the reliability of formal verification. In particular, we focus on the model-checker Uppaal as a representative of this technology. Timelocks and Zeno runs represent anomalous behaviours in a timed automaton, and may invalidate the verification of safety and liveness properties. Currently, model-checkers do not offer adequate support to prevent or detect such behaviours. In response, we develop new methods to guarantee timelock-freedom and absence of Zeno runs, which improve and complement the existent support. We implement these methods in a tool to check Uppaal specifications. The requirements language of model-checkers is not well suited to express sequence and iteration of events, or past computations. As a result, validation problems may arise during verification (i.e., the property that we verify may not accurately reflect the intended requirement). We study the logic PITL, a rich propositional subset of Interval Temporal Logic, where these requirements can be more intuitively expressed than in model-checkers. However, PITL has a decision procedure with a worst-case non-elementary complexity, which has hampered the development of efficient tool support. To address this problem, we propose (and implement) a translation from PITL to the second-order logic WS1S, for which an efficient decision procedure is provided by the tool MONA. Thanks to the many optimisations included in MONA, we obtain an efficient decision procedure for PITL, despite its non-elementary complexity. Data variables in model-checkers are restricted to bounded domains, in order to obtain fully automatic verification. However, this may be too restrictive for certain kinds of specifications (e.g., when we need to reason about unbounded buffers). In response, we develop the theory of Discrete Timed Automata as an alternative formalism for real-time systems. In Discrete Timed Automata, WS1S is used as the assertion language, which enables MONA to assist invariance proofs. Furthermore, the semantics of urgency and synchronisation adopted in Discrete Timed Automata guarantee, by construction, that specifications are free from a large class of timelocks. Thus, we argue that well-timed specifications are easier to obtain in Discrete Timed Automata than in Timed Automata and most other notations for real-time systems

Verification of real-time systems : improving tool support

We address a number of limitations of Timed Automata and real-time model-checkers, which undermine the reliability of formal verification. In particular, we focus on the model-checker Uppaal as a representative of this technology. Timelocks and Zeno runs represent anomalous behaviours in a timed automaton, and may invalidate the verification of safety and liveness properties. Currently, model-checkers do not offer adequate support to prevent or detect such behaviours. In response, we develop new methods to guarantee timelock-freedom and absence of Zeno runs, which improve and complement the existent support. We implement these methods in a tool to check Uppaal specifications. The requirements language of model-checkers is not well suited to express sequence and iteration of events, or past computations. As a result, validation problems may arise during verification (i.e., the property that we verify may not accurately reflect the intended requirement). We study the logic PITL, a rich propositional subset of Interval Temporal Logic, where these requirements can be more intuitively expressed than in model-checkers. However, PITL has a decision procedure with a worst-case non-elementary complexity, which has hampered the development of efficient tool support. To address this problem, we propose (and implement) a translation from PITL to the second-order logic WS1S, for which an efficient decision procedure is provided by the tool MONA. Thanks to the many optimisations included in MONA, we obtain an efficient decision procedure for PITL, despite its non-elementary complexity. Data variables in model-checkers are restricted to bounded domains, in order to obtain fully automatic verification. However, this may be too restrictive for certain kinds of specifications (e.g., when we need to reason about unbounded buffers). In response, we develop the theory of Discrete Timed Automata as an alternative formalism for real-time systems. In Discrete Timed Automata, WS1S is used as the assertion language, which enables MONA to assist invariance proofs. Furthermore, the semantics of urgency and synchronisation adopted in Discrete Timed Automata guarantee, by construction, that specifications are free from a large class of timelocks. Thus, we argue that well-timed specifications are easier to obtain in Discrete Timed Automata than in Timed Automata and most other notations for real-time systems.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo