10,191 research outputs found
Maximum order complexity of the sum of digits function in Zeckendorf base and polynomial subsequences
Automatic sequences are not suitable sequences for cryptographic applications
since both their subword complexity and their expansion complexity are small,
and their correlation measure of order 2 is large. These sequences are highly
predictable despite having a large maximum order complexity. However, recent
results show that polynomial subsequences of automatic sequences, such as the
Thue--Morse sequence, are better candidates for pseudorandom sequences. A
natural generalization of automatic sequences are morphic sequences, given by a
fixed point of a prolongeable morphism that is not necessarily uniform. In this
paper we prove a lower bound for the maximum order complexity of the sum of
digits function in Zeckendorf base which is an example of a morphic sequence.
We also prove that the polynomial subsequences of this sequence keep large
maximum order complexity, such as the Thue--Morse sequence.Comment: 23 pages, 5 figures, 4 table
Carryless Arithmetic Mod 10
We investigate what arithmetic would look like if carry digits into other
digit position were ignored, so that 9 + 4 = 3, 5 + 5 = 0, 9 X 4 = 6, 5 X 4 =
0, and so on. For example, the primes are now 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 41, 43, 45,
47, ... .Comment: 7 pages. To the memory of Martin Gardner (October 21, 1914 -- May 22,
2010). Revised version (with a number of small improvements), July 7 201
Stolarsky's conjecture and the sum of digits of polynomial values
Let denote the sum of the digits in the -ary expansion of an
integer . In 1978, Stolarsky showed that He conjectured that, as for , this limit
infimum should be 0 for higher powers of . We prove and generalize this
conjecture showing that for any polynomial with and and any base , For any we
give a bound on the minimal such that the ratio . Further, we give lower bounds for the number of such that
.Comment: 13 page
Patterns in rational base number systems
Number systems with a rational number as base have gained interest
in recent years. In particular, relations to Mahler's 3/2-problem as well as
the Josephus problem have been established. In the present paper we show that
the patterns of digits in the representations of positive integers in such a
number system are uniformly distributed. We study the sum-of-digits function of
number systems with rational base and use representations w.r.t. this
base to construct normal numbers in base in the spirit of Champernowne. The
main challenge in our proofs comes from the fact that the language of the
representations of integers in these number systems is not context-free. The
intricacy of this language makes it impossible to prove our results along
classical lines. In particular, we use self-affine tiles that are defined in
certain subrings of the ad\'ele ring and Fourier
analysis in . With help of these tools we are able to
reformulate our results as estimation problems for character sums
Motzkin numbers and related sequences modulo powers of 2
We show that the generating function for Motzkin
numbers , when coefficients are reduced modulo a given power of , can
be expressed as a polynomial in the basic series with coefficients being Laurent polynomials in and
. We use this result to determine modulo in terms of the binary
digits of~, thus improving, respectively complementing earlier results by
Eu, Liu and Yeh [Europ. J. Combin. 29 (2008), 1449-1466] and by Rowland and
Yassawi [J. Th\'eorie Nombres Bordeaux 27 (2015), 245-288]. Analogous results
are also shown to hold for related combinatorial sequences, namely for the
Motzkin prefix numbers, Riordan numbers, central trinomial coefficients, and
for the sequence of hex tree numbers.Comment: 28 pages, AmS-LaTeX; minor typos correcte
On the sum of digits of the factorial
Let b > 1 be an integer and denote by s_b(m) the sum of the digits of the
positive integer m when is written in base b. We prove that s_b(n!) > C_b log n
log log log n for each integer n > e, where C_b is a positive constant
depending only on b. This improves of a factor log log log n a previous lower
bound for s_b(n!) given by Luca. We prove also the same inequality but with n!
replaced by the least common multiple of 1,2,...,n.Comment: 4 page
- …