1,544 research outputs found

    Diamond-free Families

    Get PDF
    Given a finite poset P, we consider the largest size La(n,P) of a family of subsets of [n]:={1,...,n}[n]:=\{1,...,n\} that contains no subposet P. This problem has been studied intensively in recent years, and it is conjectured that π(P):=limnLa(n,P)/nchoosen/2\pi(P):= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} La(n,P)/{n choose n/2} exists for general posets P, and, moreover, it is an integer. For k2k\ge2 let \D_k denote the kk-diamond poset {A<B1,...,Bk<C}\{A< B_1,...,B_k < C\}. We study the average number of times a random full chain meets a PP-free family, called the Lubell function, and use it for P=\D_k to determine \pi(\D_k) for infinitely many values kk. A stubborn open problem is to show that \pi(\D_2)=2; here we make progress by proving \pi(\D_2)\le 2 3/11 (if it exists).Comment: 16 page

    Poset-free Families and Lubell-boundedness

    Full text link
    Given a finite poset PP, we consider the largest size \lanp of a family \F of subsets of [n]:={1,...,n}[n]:=\{1,...,n\} that contains no subposet PP. This continues the study of the asymptotic growth of \lanp; it has been conjectured that for all PP, \pi(P):= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \lanp/\nchn exists and equals a certain integer, e(P)e(P). While this is known to be true for paths, and several more general families of posets, for the simple diamond poset \D_2, the existence of π\pi frustratingly remains open. Here we develop theory to show that π(P)\pi(P) exists and equals the conjectured value e(P)e(P) for many new posets PP. We introduce a hierarchy of properties for posets, each of which implies π=e\pi=e, and some implying more precise information about \lanp. The properties relate to the Lubell function of a family \F of subsets, which is the average number of times a random full chain meets \F. We present an array of examples and constructions that possess the properties

    Induced and non-induced forbidden subposet problems

    Get PDF
    The problem of determining the maximum size La(n,P)La(n,P) that a PP-free subposet of the Boolean lattice BnB_n can have, attracted the attention of many researchers, but little is known about the induced version of these problems. In this paper we determine the asymptotic behavior of La(n,P)La^*(n,P), the maximum size that an induced PP-free subposet of the Boolean lattice BnB_n can have for the case when PP is the complete two-level poset Kr,tK_{r,t} or the complete multi-level poset Kr,s1,,sj,tK_{r,s_1,\dots,s_j,t} when all sis_i's either equal 4 or are large enough and satisfy an extra condition. We also show lower and upper bounds for the non-induced problem in the case when PP is the complete three-level poset Kr,s,tK_{r,s,t}. These bounds determine the asymptotics of La(n,Kr,s,t)La(n,K_{r,s,t}) for some values of ss independently of the values of rr and tt

    Ramsey numbers for partially-ordered sets

    Full text link
    We present a refinement of Ramsey numbers by considering graphs with a partial ordering on their vertices. This is a natural extension of the ordered Ramsey numbers. We formalize situations in which we can use arbitrary families of partially-ordered sets to form host graphs for Ramsey problems. We explore connections to well studied Tur\'an-type problems in partially-ordered sets, particularly those in the Boolean lattice. We find a strong difference between Ramsey numbers on the Boolean lattice and ordered Ramsey numbers when the partial ordering on the graphs have large antichains.Comment: 18 pages, 3 figures, 1 tabl
    corecore