2,987 research outputs found

    The non-existence of certain regular graphs of girth 5

    Get PDF
    For certain positive integers k it is shown that there is no k-regular graph with girth 5 having k2 + 3 vertices. This provides a new lower bound for the number of vertices of girth 5 graphs with these valences.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/24359/1/0000628.pd

    On graphs with cyclic defect or excess

    Get PDF
    The Moore bound constitutes both an upper bound on the order of a graph of maximum degree dd and diameter D=kD=k and a lower bound on the order of a graph of minimum degree dd and odd girth g=2k+1g=2k+1. Graphs missing or exceeding the Moore bound by ϵ\epsilon are called {\it graphs with defect or excess ϵ\epsilon}, respectively. While {\it Moore graphs} (graphs with ϵ=0\epsilon=0) and graphs with defect or excess 1 have been characterized almost completely, graphs with defect or excess 2 represent a wide unexplored area. Graphs with defect (excess) 2 satisfy the equation Gd,k(A)=Jn+BG_{d,k}(A) = J_n + B (Gd,k(A)=JnBG_{d,k}(A) = J_n-B), where AA denotes the adjacency matrix of the graph in question, nn its order, JnJ_n the n×nn\times n matrix whose entries are all 1's, BB the adjacency matrix of a union of vertex-disjoint cycles, and Gd,k(x)G_{d,k}(x) a polynomial with integer coefficients such that the matrix Gd,k(A)G_{d,k}(A) gives the number of paths of length at most kk joining each pair of vertices in the graph. In particular, if BB is the adjacency matrix of a cycle of order nn we call the corresponding graphs \emph{graphs with cyclic defect or excess}; these graphs are the subject of our attention in this paper. We prove the non-existence of infinitely many such graphs. As the highlight of the paper we provide the asymptotic upper bound of O(643d3/2)O(\frac{64}3d^{3/2}) for the number of graphs of odd degree d3d\ge3 and cyclic defect or excess. This bound is in fact quite generous, and as a way of illustration, we show the non-existence of some families of graphs of odd degree d3d\ge3 and cyclic defect or excess. Actually, we conjecture that, apart from the M\"obius ladder on 8 vertices, no non-trivial graph of any degree 3\ge 3 and cyclic defect or excess exists.Comment: 20 pages, 3 Postscript figure

    Schnyder decompositions for regular plane graphs and application to drawing

    Full text link
    Schnyder woods are decompositions of simple triangulations into three edge-disjoint spanning trees crossing each other in a specific way. In this article, we define a generalization of Schnyder woods to dd-angulations (plane graphs with faces of degree dd) for all d3d\geq 3. A \emph{Schnyder decomposition} is a set of dd spanning forests crossing each other in a specific way, and such that each internal edge is part of exactly d2d-2 of the spanning forests. We show that a Schnyder decomposition exists if and only if the girth of the dd-angulation is dd. As in the case of Schnyder woods (d=3d=3), there are alternative formulations in terms of orientations ("fractional" orientations when d5d\geq 5) and in terms of corner-labellings. Moreover, the set of Schnyder decompositions on a fixed dd-angulation of girth dd is a distributive lattice. We also show that the structures dual to Schnyder decompositions (on dd-regular plane graphs of mincut dd rooted at a vertex vv^*) are decompositions into dd spanning trees rooted at vv^* such that each edge not incident to vv^* is used in opposite directions by two trees. Additionally, for even values of dd, we show that a subclass of Schnyder decompositions, which are called even, enjoy additional properties that yield a reduced formulation; in the case d=4, these correspond to well-studied structures on simple quadrangulations (2-orientations and partitions into 2 spanning trees). In the case d=4, the dual of even Schnyder decompositions yields (planar) orthogonal and straight-line drawing algorithms. For a 4-regular plane graph GG of mincut 4 with nn vertices plus a marked vertex vv, the vertices of G\vG\backslash v are placed on a (n1)×(n1)(n-1) \times (n-1) grid according to a permutation pattern, and in the orthogonal drawing each of the 2n22n-2 edges of G\vG\backslash v has exactly one bend. Embedding also the marked vertex vv is doable at the cost of two additional rows and columns and 8 additional bends for the 4 edges incident to vv. We propose a further compaction step for the drawing algorithm and show that the obtained grid-size is strongly concentrated around 25n/32×25n/3225n/32\times 25n/32 for a uniformly random instance with nn vertices
    corecore