Inefficiency of K-FAC for Large Batch Size Training

In stochastic optimization, using large batch sizes during training can leverage parallel resources to produce faster wall-clock training times per training epoch. However, for both training loss and testing error, recent results analyzing large batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) have found sharp diminishing returns, beyond a certain critical batch size. In the hopes of addressing this, it has been suggested that the Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature (\mbox{K-FAC}) method allows for greater scalability to large batch sizes, for non-convex machine learning problems such as neural network optimization, as well as greater robustness to variation in model hyperparameters. Here, we perform a detailed empirical analysis of large batch size training %of these two hypotheses, for both \mbox{K-FAC} and SGD, evaluating performance in terms of both wall-clock time and aggregate computational cost. Our main results are twofold: first, we find that both \mbox{K-FAC} and SGD doesn't have ideal scalability behavior beyond a certain batch size, and that \mbox{K-FAC} does not exhibit improved large-batch scalability behavior, as compared to SGD; and second, we find that \mbox{K-FAC}, in addition to requiring more hyperparameters to tune, suffers from similar hyperparameter sensitivity behavior as does SGD. We discuss extensive results using ResNet and AlexNet on \mbox{CIFAR-10} and SVHN, respectively, as well as more general implications of our findings

Scavenger: A Cloud Service for Optimizing Cost and Performance of ML Training

While the pay-as-you-go nature of cloud virtual machines (VMs) makes it easy to spin-up large clusters for training ML models, it can also lead to ballooning costs. The 100s of virtual machine sizes provided by cloud platforms also makes it extremely challenging to select the ``right'' cloud cluster configuration for training. Furthermore, the training time and cost of distributed model training is highly sensitive to the cluster configurations, and presents a large and complex tradeoff-space. In this paper, we develop principled and practical techniques for optimizing the training time and cost of distributed ML model training on the cloud. Our key insight is that both parallel and statistical efficiency must be considered when selecting the optimum job configuration parameters such as the number of workers and the batch size. By combining conventional parallel scaling concepts and new insights into SGD noise, our models accurately estimate the time and cost on different cluster configurations with < 5% error. Using the repetitive nature of training and our models, we can search for optimum cloud configurations in a black-box, online manner. Our approach reduces training times by 2 times and costs more more than 50%. Compared to an oracle-based approach, our performance models are accurate to within 2% such that the search imposes an overhead of just 10%