3 research outputs found

    The effect of auditory and visual signal availability on speech perception

    No full text
    International audienceWe used Auditory/visual masks to investigate how the availability of speech signals governs speech perception. Stimuli were videos of a talker uttering sentences. The auditory mask consisted of speech shaped noise; the visual mask, a circular patch obscuring talker's mouth region. Auditory signals were quantified by the glimpse proportion (GP); visual signals by visual entropy (VE), a measure based on visual change. Auditory stimuli mixed with the noise at-3 dB SNR were presented paired with the talker's static or moving face (full vs. masked face) for speech identification. Speech identification was more accurate with the moving face (visual benefit); with greater benefit for the full than masked face. The GP correlation with speech identification scores was highest in the static face condition. The visual benefit was correlated with the VE but only when the latter correlated highly with mid-frequency speech energy of the auditory signal

    The effect of auditory and visual signal availability on speech perception

    No full text
    We used Auditory/visual masks to investigate how the availability of speech signals governs speech perception. Stimuli were videos of a talker uttering sentences. The auditory mask consisted of speech shaped noise; the visual mask, a circular patch obscuring talker’s mouth region. Auditory signals were quantified by the glimpse proportion (GP); visual signals by visual entropy (VE), a measure based on visual change. Auditory stimuli mixed with the noise at -3 dB SNR were presented paired with the talker’s static or moving face (full vs. masked face) for speech identification. Speech identification was more accurate with the moving face (visual benefit); with greater benefit for the full than masked face. The GP correlation with speech identification scores was highest in the static face condition. The visual benefit was correlated with the VE but only when the latter correlated highly with mid-frequency speech energy of the auditory signal

    The effect of auditory and visual signal availability on speech perception

    No full text
    International audienceWe used Auditory/visual masks to investigate how the availability of speech signals governs speech perception. Stimuli were videos of a talker uttering sentences. The auditory mask consisted of speech shaped noise; the visual mask, a circular patch obscuring talker's mouth region. Auditory signals were quantified by the glimpse proportion (GP); visual signals by visual entropy (VE), a measure based on visual change. Auditory stimuli mixed with the noise at-3 dB SNR were presented paired with the talker's static or moving face (full vs. masked face) for speech identification. Speech identification was more accurate with the moving face (visual benefit); with greater benefit for the full than masked face. The GP correlation with speech identification scores was highest in the static face condition. The visual benefit was correlated with the VE but only when the latter correlated highly with mid-frequency speech energy of the auditory signal
    corecore