227 research outputs found

    Natural realizations of sparsity matroids

    Get PDF
    A hypergraph G with n vertices and m hyperedges with d endpoints each is (k,l)-sparse if for all sub-hypergraphs G' on n' vertices and m' edges, m'\le kn'-l. For integers k and l satisfying 0\le l\le dk-1, this is known to be a linearly representable matroidal family. Motivated by problems in rigidity theory, we give a new linear representation theorem for the (k,l)-sparse hypergraphs that is natural; i.e., the representing matrix captures the vertex-edge incidence structure of the underlying hypergraph G.Comment: Corrected some typos from the previous version; to appear in Ars Mathematica Contemporane

    Rigidity of frameworks on expanding spheres

    Get PDF
    A rigidity theory is developed for bar-joint frameworks in Rd+1\mathbb{R}^{d+1} whose vertices are constrained to lie on concentric dd-spheres with independently variable radii. In particular, combinatorial characterisations are established for the rigidity of generic frameworks for d=1d=1 with an arbitrary number of independently variable radii, and for d=2d=2 with at most two variable radii. This includes a characterisation of the rigidity or flexibility of uniformly expanding spherical frameworks in R3\mathbb{R}^{3}. Due to the equivalence of the generic rigidity between Euclidean space and spherical space, these results interpolate between rigidity in 1D and 2D and to some extent between rigidity in 2D and 3D. Symmetry-adapted counts for the detection of symmetry-induced continuous flexibility in frameworks on spheres with variable radii are also provided.Comment: 22 pages, 2 figures, updated reference

    One brick at a time: a survey of inductive constructions in rigidity theory

    Full text link
    We present a survey of results concerning the use of inductive constructions to study the rigidity of frameworks. By inductive constructions we mean simple graph moves which can be shown to preserve the rigidity of the corresponding framework. We describe a number of cases in which characterisations of rigidity were proved by inductive constructions. That is, by identifying recursive operations that preserved rigidity and proving that these operations were sufficient to generate all such frameworks. We also outline the use of inductive constructions in some recent areas of particularly active interest, namely symmetric and periodic frameworks, frameworks on surfaces, and body-bar frameworks. We summarize the key outstanding open problems related to inductions.Comment: 24 pages, 12 figures, final versio

    A necessary condition for generic rigidity of bar-and-joint frameworks in dd-space

    Full text link
    A graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is dd-sparse if each subset XβŠ†VX\subseteq V with ∣X∣β‰₯d|X|\geq d induces at most d∣Xβˆ£βˆ’(d+12)d|X|-{{d+1}\choose{2}} edges in GG. Maxwell showed in 1864 that a necessary condition for a generic bar-and-joint framework with at least d+1d+1 vertices to be rigid in Rd{\mathbb R}^d is that GG should have a dd-sparse subgraph with d∣Xβˆ£βˆ’(d+12)d|X|-{{d+1}\choose{2}} edges. This necessary condition is also sufficient when d=1,2d=1,2 but not when dβ‰₯3d\geq 3. Cheng and Sitharam strengthened Maxwell's condition by showing that every maximal dd-sparse subgraph of GG should have d∣Xβˆ£βˆ’(d+12)d|X|-{{d+1}\choose{2}} edges when d=3d=3. We extend their result to all d≀11d\leq 11.Comment: There was an error in the proof of Theorem 3.3(b) in version 1 of this paper. A weaker statement was proved in version 2 and then used to derive the main result Theorem 4.1 when d≀5d\leq 5. The proof technique was subsequently refined in collaboration with Hakan Guler to extend this result to all d≀11d\leq 11 in Theorem 3.3 of version
    • …
    corecore