3,450 research outputs found
Social Recognition and Economic Equilibrium
This paper is an attempt to incorporate the human ability of recognition, especially, the ability to recognize the society to which they belong, with the economic equilibrium theory characterized by a description of society through individual rational behaviors. Contents may be classified into the following three categories: (1) a rigorous set theoretical treatment of the description of individual rationality; (2) set theoretical description of the validity in a society; and (3) rationality as an equilibrium (fixed point) of social recognition.Social Recognition, Rationality, Social Equilibrium, Fixed Point Theorem, Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem.
Reasoning about Knowledge and Belief: A Syntactical Treatment
The study of formal theories of agents has intensified over the last couple of decades, since such formalisms can be viewed as providing the specifications for building rational agents and multi-agent systems. Most of the proposed approaches are based upon the well-understood framework of modal logics and possible world semantics. Although intuitive and expressive, these approaches lack two properties that can be considered important to a rational agent's reasoning: quantification over the propositional attitudes, and self-referential statements. This paper presents an alternative framework which is different from those found in the literature in two ways: Firstly, a syntactical approach for the representation of the propositional attitudes is adopted. This involves the use of a truth predicate and syntactic modalities which are defined in terms of the truth predicate itself and corresponding modal operators. Secondly, an agent's information state includes both knowledge and beliefs. Independent modal operators for the two notions are introduced and based on them syntactic modalities are defined. Furthermore, the relation between knowledge and belief is thoroughly explored and three different connection axiomatisations for the modalities and the syntactic modalities are proposed and their properties investigated
Variations on a Montagovian theme
What are the objects of knowledge, belief, probability, apriority or analyticity? For at least some of these properties, it seems plausible that the objects are sentences, or sentence-like entities. However, results from mathematical logic indicate that sentential properties are subject to severe formal limitations. After surveying these results, I argue that they are more problematic than often assumed, that they can be avoided by taking the objects of the relevant property to be coarse-grained (âsets of worldsâ) propositions, and that all this has little to do with the choice between operators and predicates
An Epistemicist Solution to Curry's Paradox
This paper targets a series of potential issues for the discussion of, and modal resolution to, the alethic paradoxes advanced by Scharp (2013). I aim, then, to provide a novel, epistemicist treatment to Curry's Paradox. The epistemicist solution that I advance enables the retention of both classical logic and the traditional rules for the alethic predicate: truth-elimination and truth-introduction
Solutions to the Knower Paradox in the Light of Haackâs Criteria
The knower paradox states that the statement âWe know that this statement is falseâ leads to inconsistency. This article presents a fresh look at this paradox and some well-known solutions from the literature. Paul ĂgrĂ© discusses three possible solutions that modal provability logic provides for the paradox by surveying and comparing three different provability interpretations of modality, originally described by Skyrms, Anderson, and Solovay. In this article, some background is explained to clarify ĂgrĂ©âs solutions, all three of which hinge on intricacies of provability logic and its arithmetical interpretations. To check whether ĂgrĂ©âs solutions are satisfactory, we use the criteria for solutions to paradoxes defined by Susan Haack and we propose some refinements of them. This article aims to describe to what extent the knower paradox can be solved using provability logic and to what extent the solutions proposed in the literature satisfy Haackâs criteria. Finally, the article offers some reflections on the relation between knowledge, proof, and provability, as inspired by the knower paradox and its solutions.</p
- âŠ