On the relative proof complexity of deep inference via atomic flows

We consider the proof complexity of the minimal complete fragment, KS, of standard deep inference systems for propositional logic. To examine the size of proofs we employ atomic flows, diagrams that trace structural changes through a proof but ignore logical information. As results we obtain a polynomial simulation of versions of Resolution, along with some extensions. We also show that these systems, as well as bounded-depth Frege systems, cannot polynomially simulate KS, by giving polynomial-size proofs of certain variants of the propositional pigeonhole principle in KS.Comment: 27 pages, 2 figures, full version of conference pape

On transformations of constant depth propositional proofs

This paper studies the complexity of constant depth propositional proofs in the cedent and sequent calculus. We discuss the relationships between the size of tree-like proofs, the size of dag-like proofs, and the heights of proofs. The main result is to correct a proof construction in an earlier paper about transformations from proofs with polylogarithmic height and constantly many formulas per cedent

A Complexity Gap for Tree-Resolution

It is shown that any sequence  psi_n of tautologies which expresses thevalidity of a fixed combinatorial principle either is "easy" i.e. has polynomialsize tree-resolution proofs or is "difficult" i.e requires exponentialsize tree-resolution proofs. It is shown that the class of tautologies whichare hard (for tree-resolution) is identical to the class of tautologies whichare based on combinatorial principles which are violated for infinite sets.Actually it is shown that the gap-phenomena is valid for tautologies basedon infinite mathematical theories (i.e. not just based on a single proposition).We clarify the link between translating combinatorial principles (ormore general statements from predicate logic) and the recent idea of using the symmetrical group to generate problems of propositional logic.Finally, we show that it is undecidable whether a sequence  psi_n (of thekind we consider) has polynomial size tree-resolution proofs or requiresexponential size tree-resolution proofs. Also we show that the degree ofthe polynomial in the polynomial size (in case it exists) is non-recursive,but semi-decidable.Keywords: Logical aspects of Complexity, Propositional proof complexity,Resolution proofs.

Generic Modal Cut Elimination Applied to Conditional Logics

We develop a general criterion for cut elimination in sequent calculi for propositional modal logics, which rests on absorption of cut, contraction, weakening and inversion by the purely modal part of the rule system. Our criterion applies also to a wide variety of logics outside the realm of normal modal logic. We give extensive example instantiations of our framework to various conditional logics. For these, we obtain fully internalised calculi which are substantially simpler than those known in the literature, along with leaner proofs of cut elimination and complexity. In one case, conditional logic with modus ponens and conditional excluded middle, cut elimination and complexity were explicitly stated as open in the literature

Iterated lower bound formulas: a diagonalization-based approach to proof complexity

We propose a diagonalization-based approach to several important questions in proof complexity. We illustrate this approach in the context of the algebraic proof system IPS and in the context of propositional proof systems more generally. We use the approach to give an explicit sequence of CNF formulas {φn} such that VNP ≠ VP iff there are no polynomial-size IPS proofs for the formulas φn. This provides a natural equivalence between proof complexity lower bounds and standard algebraic complexity lower bounds. Our proof of this fact uses the implication from IPS lower bounds to algebraic complexity lower bounds due to Grochow and Pitassi together with a diagonalization argument: the formulas φn themselves assert the non-existence of short IPS proofs for formulas encoding VNP ≠ VP at a different input length. Our result also has meta-mathematical implications: it gives evidence for the difficulty of proving strong lower bounds for IPS within IPS. For any strong enough propositional proof system R, we define the *iterated R-lower bound formulas*, which inductively assert the non-existence of short R proofs for formulas encoding the same statement at a different input length, and propose them as explicit hard candidates for the proof system R. We observe that this hypothesis holds for Resolution following recent results of Atserias and Muller and of Garlik, and give evidence in favour of it for other proof systems