3,192 research outputs found
Going higher in the First-order Quantifier Alternation Hierarchy on Words
We investigate the quantifier alternation hierarchy in first-order logic on
finite words. Levels in this hierarchy are defined by counting the number of
quantifier alternations in formulas. We prove that one can decide membership of
a regular language to the levels (boolean combination of
formulas having only 1 alternation) and (formulas having only 2
alternations beginning with an existential block). Our proof works by
considering a deeper problem, called separation, which, once solved for lower
levels, allows us to solve membership for higher levels
Separating regular languages with two quantifier alternations
We investigate a famous decision problem in automata theory: separation.
Given a class of language C, the separation problem for C takes as input two
regular languages and asks whether there exists a third one which belongs to C,
includes the first one and is disjoint from the second. Typically, obtaining an
algorithm for separation yields a deep understanding of the investigated class
C. This explains why a lot of effort has been devoted to finding algorithms for
the most prominent classes.
Here, we are interested in classes within concatenation hierarchies. Such
hierarchies are built using a generic construction process: one starts from an
initial class called the basis and builds new levels by applying generic
operations. The most famous one, the dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and
Cohen, classifies the languages definable in first-order logic. Moreover, it
was shown by Thomas that it corresponds to the quantifier alternation hierarchy
of first-order logic: each level in the dot-depth corresponds to the languages
that can be defined with a prescribed number of quantifier blocks. Finding
separation algorithms for all levels in this hierarchy is among the most famous
open problems in automata theory.
Our main theorem is generic: we show that separation is decidable for the
level 3/2 of any concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite. Furthermore, in
the special case of the dot-depth, we push this result to the level 5/2. In
logical terms, this solves separation for : first-order sentences
having at most three quantifier blocks starting with an existential one
Languages of Dot-depth One over Infinite Words
Over finite words, languages of dot-depth one are expressively complete for
alternation-free first-order logic. This fragment is also known as the Boolean
closure of existential first-order logic. Here, the atomic formulas comprise
order, successor, minimum, and maximum predicates. Knast (1983) has shown that
it is decidable whether a language has dot-depth one. We extend Knast's result
to infinite words. In particular, we describe the class of languages definable
in alternation-free first-order logic over infinite words, and we give an
effective characterization of this fragment. This characterization has two
components. The first component is identical to Knast's algebraic property for
finite words and the second component is a topological property, namely being a
Boolean combination of Cantor sets.
As an intermediate step we consider finite and infinite words simultaneously.
We then obtain the results for infinite words as well as for finite words as
special cases. In particular, we give a new proof of Knast's Theorem on
languages of dot-depth one over finite words.Comment: Presented at LICS 201
Adding modular predicates to first-order fragments
We investigate the decidability of the definability problem for fragments of
first order logic over finite words enriched with modular predicates. Our
approach aims toward the most generic statements that we could achieve, which
successfully covers the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first order logic
and some of its fragments. We obtain that deciding this problem for each level
of the alternation hierarchy of both first order logic and its two-variable
fragment when equipped with all regular numerical predicates is not harder than
deciding it for the corresponding level equipped with only the linear order and
the successor. For two-variable fragments we also treat the case of the
signature containing only the order and modular predicates.Relying on some
recent results, this proves the decidability for each level of the alternation
hierarchy of the two-variable first order fragmentwhile in the case of the
first order logic the question remains open for levels greater than two.The
main ingredients of the proofs are syntactic transformations of first order
formulas as well as the algebraic framework of finite categories
Separation for dot-depth two
The dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and Cohen classifies the star-free
languages of finite words. By a theorem of McNaughton and Papert, these are
also the first-order definable languages. The dot-depth rose to prominence
following the work of Thomas, who proved an exact correspondence with the
quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic: each level in the
dot-depth hierarchy consists of all languages that can be defined with a
prescribed number of quantifier blocks. One of the most famous open problems in
automata theory is to settle whether the membership problem is decidable for
each level: is it possible to decide whether an input regular language belongs
to this level?
Despite a significant research effort, membership by itself has only been
solved for low levels. A recent breakthrough was achieved by replacing
membership with a more general problem: separation. Given two input languages,
one has to decide whether there exists a third language in the investigated
level containing the first language and disjoint from the second. The
motivation is that: (1) while more difficult, separation is more rewarding (2)
it provides a more convenient framework (3) all recent membership algorithms
are reductions to separation for lower levels.
We present a separation algorithm for dot-depth two. While this is our most
prominent application, our result is more general. We consider a family of
hierarchies that includes the dot-depth: concatenation hierarchies. They are
built via a generic construction process. One first chooses an initial class,
the basis, which is the lowest level in the hierarchy. Further levels are built
by applying generic operations. Our main theorem states that for any
concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite, separation is decidable for
level one. In the special case of the dot-depth, this can be lifted to level
two using previously known results
- …