Pacific Review Summer 1968

https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/pacific-review/1207/thumbnail.jp

Pacific Review Summer 1968

https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/pacific-review/1207/thumbnail.jp

Moral of the Story : How Children’s Books Regulated Race Relations Starting Before the Civil War to Today

The relationship between the racial content displayed in children\u27s books and the development of relationships between blacks and whites has consistently been one that has been overlooked. The purpose of this article is to address the correlation between the two topics while also explaining how racial propaganda in children\u27s books has affected the psychology of those in the relationship. Children\u27s books are key components of everyone\u27s childhood and understanding how they have impacted how we think and behave in relationships with the other race is the key topic highlighted in this article. Not only do you get a perspective into why these relations form, but you also get some insight into how this is possible in terms of psychology

November 22, 1924

The Breeze is the student newspaper of James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia

Issue 371: May 6-20, 2021

https://egrove.olemiss.edu/tlv/1127/thumbnail.jp

Annual reports of the selectmen, treasurer, highway agents, auditors, board of education, library trustees, trustees of town trust funds and town clerk of the town of Newington, N.H. for the year ending January 31, 1929.

This is an annual report containing vital statistics for a town/city in the state of New Hampshire

Sauron and Dracula

Superficial similarities between the Sauron of Tolkien\u27s The Lord of the Rings and the Dracula of Bram Stoker\u27s Dracula will strike anyone who reads both works. But the relationship between the two chief antagonists goes far beyond the superficial. Sauron and Dracula are tyrant-monsters of similar motives and powers. Both are counter-creators of a mode of existence associated with the powers of darkness which is parasitical on the natural life of creation and at active war with it, called not living but Un-Dead (spelled undead in Tolkien, III 116) in both. Both seek to draw others into this undeath and hold them there by establishing a bond of intimate psychological domination over them. Both tyrants use hypnotic eyes in order to feed their visions into the minds of their victims, and control their actions once it is there. In both works, domination by the tyrant represents high spiritual terror because it is a kind of damnation-on-earth which cuts off its victims from the possibility of release by a natural death. Finally, both raise troubling questions about people\u27s moral responsibilities for the content of their unconscious minds. But intriguing as all these similarities are, the divergences in the work are still more striking, because they show a darkening in the concept of evil, and a heightened consciousness on Tolkien\u27s part of his protagonists\u27 struggle to maintain their own good vision of the world despite the power of the Eye of the tyrant, in whose vision hope is unreal

Measurement of pupil interest in types of stories at grade 6 level by ballot method to determine child preference

Thesis (M.A.)--Boston University, 1947. This item was digitized by the Internet Archive