154 research outputs found
Almost Optimal Classical Approximation Algorithms for a Quantum Generalization of Max-Cut
Approximation algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are a central direction of study in theoretical computer science. In this work, we study classical product state approximation algorithms for a physically motivated quantum generalization of Max-Cut, known as the quantum Heisenberg model. This model is notoriously difficult to solve exactly, even on bipartite graphs, in stark contrast to the classical setting of Max-Cut. Here we show, for any interaction graph, how to classically and efficiently obtain approximation ratios 0.649 (anti-feromagnetic XY model) and 0.498 (anti-ferromagnetic Heisenberg XYZ model). These are almost optimal; we show that the best possible ratios achievable by a product state for these models is 2/3 and 1/2, respectively
Faster SDP hierarchy solvers for local rounding algorithms
Convex relaxations based on different hierarchies of linear/semi-definite
programs have been used recently to devise approximation algorithms for various
optimization problems. The approximation guarantee of these algorithms improves
with the number of {\em rounds} in the hierarchy, though the complexity of
solving (or even writing down the solution for) the 'th level program grows
as where is the input size.
In this work, we observe that many of these algorithms are based on {\em
local} rounding procedures that only use a small part of the SDP solution (of
size instead of ). We give an algorithm to
find the requisite portion in time polynomial in its size. The challenge in
achieving this is that the required portion of the solution is not fixed a
priori but depends on other parts of the solution, sometimes in a complicated
iterative manner.
Our solver leads to time algorithms to obtain the same
guarantees in many cases as the earlier time algorithms based on
rounds of the Lasserre hierarchy. In particular, guarantees based on rounds can be realized in polynomial time.
We develop and describe our algorithm in a fairly general abstract framework.
The main technical tool in our work, which might be of independent interest in
convex optimization, is an efficient ellipsoid algorithm based separation
oracle for convex programs that can output a {\em certificate of infeasibility
with restricted support}. This is used in a recursive manner to find a sequence
of consistent points in nested convex bodies that "fools" local rounding
algorithms.Comment: 30 pages, 8 figure
Subsampling Mathematical Relaxations and Average-case Complexity
We initiate a study of when the value of mathematical relaxations such as
linear and semidefinite programs for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) is
approximately preserved when restricting the instance to a sub-instance induced
by a small random subsample of the variables. Let be a family of CSPs such
as 3SAT, Max-Cut, etc., and let be a relaxation for , in the sense
that for every instance , is an upper bound the maximum
fraction of satisfiable constraints of . Loosely speaking, we say that
subsampling holds for and if for every sufficiently dense instance and every , if we let be the instance obtained by
restricting to a sufficiently large constant number of variables, then
. We say that weak subsampling holds if the
above guarantee is replaced with whenever
. We show: 1. Subsampling holds for the BasicLP and BasicSDP
programs. BasicSDP is a variant of the relaxation considered by Raghavendra
(2008), who showed it gives an optimal approximation factor for every CSP under
the unique games conjecture. BasicLP is the linear programming analog of
BasicSDP. 2. For tighter versions of BasicSDP obtained by adding additional
constraints from the Lasserre hierarchy, weak subsampling holds for CSPs of
unique games type. 3. There are non-unique CSPs for which even weak subsampling
fails for the above tighter semidefinite programs. Also there are unique CSPs
for which subsampling fails for the Sherali-Adams linear programming hierarchy.
As a corollary of our weak subsampling for strong semidefinite programs, we
obtain a polynomial-time algorithm to certify that random geometric graphs (of
the type considered by Feige and Schechtman, 2002) of max-cut value
have a cut value at most .Comment: Includes several more general results that subsume the previous
version of the paper
On Quadratic Programming with a Ratio Objective
Quadratic Programming (QP) is the well-studied problem of maximizing over
{-1,1} values the quadratic form \sum_{i \ne j} a_{ij} x_i x_j. QP captures
many known combinatorial optimization problems, and assuming the unique games
conjecture, semidefinite programming techniques give optimal approximation
algorithms. We extend this body of work by initiating the study of Quadratic
Programming problems where the variables take values in the domain {-1,0,1}.
The specific problems we study are
QP-Ratio : \max_{\{-1,0,1\}^n} \frac{\sum_{i \not = j} a_{ij} x_i x_j}{\sum
x_i^2}, and Normalized QP-Ratio : \max_{\{-1,0,1\}^n} \frac{\sum_{i \not = j}
a_{ij} x_i x_j}{\sum d_i x_i^2}, where d_i = \sum_j |a_{ij}|
We consider an SDP relaxation obtained by adding constraints to the natural
eigenvalue (or SDP) relaxation for this problem. Using this, we obtain an
algorithm for QP-ratio. We also obtain an
approximation for bipartite graphs, and better algorithms
for special cases. As with other problems with ratio objectives (e.g. uniform
sparsest cut), it seems difficult to obtain inapproximability results based on
P!=NP. We give two results that indicate that QP-Ratio is hard to approximate
to within any constant factor. We also give a natural distribution on instances
of QP-Ratio for which an n^\epsilon approximation (for \epsilon roughly 1/10)
seems out of reach of current techniques
The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structures
We study planted problems---finding hidden structures in random noisy
inputs---through the lens of the sum-of-squares semidefinite programming
hierarchy (SoS). This family of powerful semidefinite programs has recently
yielded many new algorithms for planted problems, often achieving the best
known polynomial-time guarantees in terms of accuracy of recovered solutions
and robustness to noise. One theme in recent work is the design of spectral
algorithms which match the guarantees of SoS algorithms for planted problems.
Classical spectral algorithms are often unable to accomplish this: the twist in
these new spectral algorithms is the use of spectral structure of matrices
whose entries are low-degree polynomials of the input variables. We prove that
for a wide class of planted problems, including refuting random constraint
satisfaction problems, tensor and sparse PCA, densest-k-subgraph, community
detection in stochastic block models, planted clique, and others, eigenvalues
of degree-d matrix polynomials are as powerful as SoS semidefinite programs of
roughly degree d. For such problems it is therefore always possible to match
the guarantees of SoS without solving a large semidefinite program. Using
related ideas on SoS algorithms and low-degree matrix polynomials (and inspired
by recent work on SoS and the planted clique problem by Barak et al.), we prove
new nearly-tight SoS lower bounds for the tensor and sparse principal component
analysis problems. Our lower bounds for sparse principal component analysis are
the first to suggest that going beyond existing algorithms for this problem may
require sub-exponential time
Strongly Refuting Random CSPs Below the Spectral Threshold
Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are known to exhibit threshold
phenomena: given a uniformly random instance of a CSP with variables and
clauses, there is a value of beyond which the CSP will be
unsatisfiable with high probability. Strong refutation is the problem of
certifying that no variable assignment satisfies more than a constant fraction
of clauses; this is the natural algorithmic problem in the unsatisfiable regime
(when ).
Intuitively, strong refutation should become easier as the clause density
grows, because the contradictions introduced by the random clauses become
more locally apparent. For CSPs such as -SAT and -XOR, there is a
long-standing gap between the clause density at which efficient strong
refutation algorithms are known, , and the
clause density at which instances become unsatisfiable with high probability,
.
In this paper, we give spectral and sum-of-squares algorithms for strongly
refuting random -XOR instances with clause density in time or in
rounds of the sum-of-squares hierarchy, for any
and any integer . Our algorithms provide a smooth
transition between the clause density at which polynomial-time algorithms are
known at , and brute-force refutation at the satisfiability
threshold when . We also leverage our -XOR results to obtain
strong refutation algorithms for SAT (or any other Boolean CSP) at similar
clause densities. Our algorithms match the known sum-of-squares lower bounds
due to Grigoriev and Schonebeck, up to logarithmic factors.
Additionally, we extend our techniques to give new results for certifying
upper bounds on the injective tensor norm of random tensors
- …