82 research outputs found
Lower bounds on the size of semidefinite programming relaxations
We introduce a method for proving lower bounds on the efficacy of
semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations for combinatorial problems. In
particular, we show that the cut, TSP, and stable set polytopes on -vertex
graphs are not the linear image of the feasible region of any SDP (i.e., any
spectrahedron) of dimension less than , for some constant .
This result yields the first super-polynomial lower bounds on the semidefinite
extension complexity of any explicit family of polytopes.
Our results follow from a general technique for proving lower bounds on the
positive semidefinite rank of a matrix. To this end, we establish a close
connection between arbitrary SDPs and those arising from the sum-of-squares SDP
hierarchy. For approximating maximum constraint satisfaction problems, we prove
that SDPs of polynomial-size are equivalent in power to those arising from
degree- sum-of-squares relaxations. This result implies, for instance,
that no family of polynomial-size SDP relaxations can achieve better than a
7/8-approximation for MAX-3-SAT
The power of Sherali-Adams relaxations for general-valued CSPs
We give a precise algebraic characterisation of the power of Sherali-Adams
relaxations for solvability of valued constraint satisfaction problems to
optimality. The condition is that of bounded width which has already been shown
to capture the power of local consistency methods for decision CSPs and the
power of semidefinite programming for robust approximation of CSPs.
Our characterisation has several algorithmic and complexity consequences. On
the algorithmic side, we show that several novel and many known valued
constraint languages are tractable via the third level of the Sherali-Adams
relaxation. For the known languages, this is a significantly simpler algorithm
than the previously obtained ones. On the complexity side, we obtain a
dichotomy theorem for valued constraint languages that can express an injective
unary function. This implies a simple proof of the dichotomy theorem for
conservative valued constraint languages established by Kolmogorov and Zivny
[JACM'13], and also a dichotomy theorem for the exact solvability of
Minimum-Solution problems. These are generalisations of Minimum-Ones problems
to arbitrary finite domains. Our result improves on several previous
classifications by Khanna et al. [SICOMP'00], Jonsson et al. [SICOMP'08], and
Uppman [ICALP'13].Comment: Full version of an ICALP'15 paper (arXiv:1502.05301
Limitations of semidefinite programs for separable states and entangled games
Semidefinite programs (SDPs) are a framework for exact or approximate
optimization that have widespread application in quantum information theory. We
introduce a new method for using reductions to construct integrality gaps for
SDPs. These are based on new limitations on the sum-of-squares (SoS) hierarchy
in approximating two particularly important sets in quantum information theory,
where previously no -round integrality gaps were known: the set of
separable (i.e. unentangled) states, or equivalently, the
norm of a matrix, and the set of quantum correlations; i.e. conditional
probability distributions achievable with local measurements on a shared
entangled state. In both cases no-go theorems were previously known based on
computational assumptions such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) which
asserts that 3-SAT requires exponential time to solve. Our unconditional
results achieve the same parameters as all of these previous results (for
separable states) or as some of the previous results (for quantum
correlations). In some cases we can make use of the framework of
Lee-Raghavendra-Steurer (LRS) to establish integrality gaps for any SDP, not
only the SoS hierarchy. Our hardness result on separable states also yields a
dimension lower bound of approximate disentanglers, answering a question of
Watrous and Aaronson et al. These results can be viewed as limitations on the
monogamy principle, the PPT test, the ability of Tsirelson-type bounds to
restrict quantum correlations, as well as the SDP hierarchies of
Doherty-Parrilo-Spedalieri, Navascues-Pironio-Acin and Berta-Fawzi-Scholz.Comment: 47 pages. v2. small changes, fixes and clarifications. published
versio
The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structures
We study planted problems---finding hidden structures in random noisy
inputs---through the lens of the sum-of-squares semidefinite programming
hierarchy (SoS). This family of powerful semidefinite programs has recently
yielded many new algorithms for planted problems, often achieving the best
known polynomial-time guarantees in terms of accuracy of recovered solutions
and robustness to noise. One theme in recent work is the design of spectral
algorithms which match the guarantees of SoS algorithms for planted problems.
Classical spectral algorithms are often unable to accomplish this: the twist in
these new spectral algorithms is the use of spectral structure of matrices
whose entries are low-degree polynomials of the input variables. We prove that
for a wide class of planted problems, including refuting random constraint
satisfaction problems, tensor and sparse PCA, densest-k-subgraph, community
detection in stochastic block models, planted clique, and others, eigenvalues
of degree-d matrix polynomials are as powerful as SoS semidefinite programs of
roughly degree d. For such problems it is therefore always possible to match
the guarantees of SoS without solving a large semidefinite program. Using
related ideas on SoS algorithms and low-degree matrix polynomials (and inspired
by recent work on SoS and the planted clique problem by Barak et al.), we prove
new nearly-tight SoS lower bounds for the tensor and sparse principal component
analysis problems. Our lower bounds for sparse principal component analysis are
the first to suggest that going beyond existing algorithms for this problem may
require sub-exponential time
From Weak to Strong LP Gaps for All CSPs
We study the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) by linear programming (LP) relaxations. We show that for every CSP, the approximation obtained by a basic LP relaxation, is no weaker than the approximation obtained using relaxations given by Omega(log(n)/log(log(n))) levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy on instances of size n.
It was proved by Chan et al. [FOCS 2013] (and recently strengthened by Kothari et al. [STOC 2017]) that for CSPs, any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than relaxations obtained by a super-constant levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. Combining this with our result also implies that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than simply the basic LP, which can be thought of as the base level of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. This essentially gives a dichotomy result for approximation of CSPs by polynomial size LP extended formulations.
Using our techniques, we also simplify and strengthen the result by Khot et al. [STOC 2014] on (strong) approximation resistance for LPs. They provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which Omega(loglog n) levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy cannot achieve an approximation better than a random assignment. We simplify their proof and strengthen the bound to Omega(log(n)/log(log(n))) levels
Semidefinite programming and linear equations vs. homomorphism problems
We introduce a relaxation for homomorphism problems that combines
semidefinite programming with linear Diophantine equations, and propose a
framework for the analysis of its power based on the spectral theory of
association schemes. We use this framework to establish an unconditional lower
bound against the semidefinite programming + linear equations model, by showing
that the relaxation does not solve the approximate graph homomorphism problem
and thus, in particular, the approximate graph colouring problem
- …