Spartan Daily, December 5, 1961

Volume 49, Issue 45https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/4232/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, May 16, 1940

Volume 28, Issue 142https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/3089/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, November 13, 1959

Volume 47, Issue 37https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/3953/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, May 24, 1956

Volume 43, Issue 142https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/12350/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, October 2, 1934

Volume 23, Issue 8https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/2187/thumbnail.jp

Spartan Daily, October 13, 1961

Volume 49, Issue 13https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/spartandaily/4200/thumbnail.jp

Looking ahead: forecasting and planning for the longer-range future, April 1, 2, and 3, 2005

This repository item contains a single issue of the Pardee Conference Series, a publication series that began publishing in 2006 by the Boston University Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future. This was the Center's spring Conference that took place during April 1, 2, and 3, 2005.The conference allowed for many highly esteemed scholars and professionals from a broad range of fields to come together to discuss strategies designed for the 21st century and beyond. The speakers and discussants covered a broad range of subjects including: long-term policy analysis, forecasting for business and investment, the National Intelligence Council Global Trends 2020 report, Europe’s transition from the Marshal plan to the EU, forecasting global transitions, foreign policy planning, and forecasting for defense

Variation in motion events: Theory and applications

This chapter analyses the role of intratypological and dialectal variation in the lexicalisation of motion events (Talmy 1991, 2000) and its application to second language acquisition. The first part discusses intratypological variation with respect to the semantic component of Path and proposes a cline of Path salience on the basis of twenty-one languages. Then, it describes dialectal variation in Spanish and Aragonese. Results show that dialects within these two Romance languages differ in the type of linguistic resources they use as well as in their quality and quantity. The second part briefly reviews some L2 problematic areas that can benefit from these approaches such as conceptual transfer, deixis, and idiomaticity. Examples are drawn from L2 Spanish and L2 Basque