3,187 research outputs found
Optimal Sparsification for Some Binary CSPs Using Low-degree Polynomials
This paper analyzes to what extent it is possible to efficiently reduce the
number of clauses in NP-hard satisfiability problems, without changing the
answer. Upper and lower bounds are established using the concept of
kernelization. Existing results show that if NP is not contained in coNP/poly,
no efficient preprocessing algorithm can reduce n-variable instances of CNF-SAT
with d literals per clause, to equivalent instances with bits for
any e > 0. For the Not-All-Equal SAT problem, a compression to size
exists. We put these results in a common framework by analyzing
the compressibility of binary CSPs. We characterize constraint types based on
the minimum degree of multivariate polynomials whose roots correspond to the
satisfying assignments, obtaining (nearly) matching upper and lower bounds in
several settings. Our lower bounds show that not just the number of
constraints, but also the encoding size of individual constraints plays an
important role. For example, for Exact Satisfiability with unbounded clause
length it is possible to efficiently reduce the number of constraints to n+1,
yet no polynomial-time algorithm can reduce to an equivalent instance with
bits for any e > 0, unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly.Comment: Updated the cross-composition in lemma 18 (minor update), since the
previous version did NOT satisfy requirement 4 of lemma 18 (the proof of
Claim 20 was incorrect
Closing the Gap Between Short and Long XORs for Model Counting
Many recent algorithms for approximate model counting are based on a
reduction to combinatorial searches over random subsets of the space defined by
parity or XOR constraints. Long parity constraints (involving many variables)
provide strong theoretical guarantees but are computationally difficult. Short
parity constraints are easier to solve but have weaker statistical properties.
It is currently not known how long these parity constraints need to be. We
close the gap by providing matching necessary and sufficient conditions on the
required asymptotic length of the parity constraints. Further, we provide a new
family of lower bounds and the first non-trivial upper bounds on the model
count that are valid for arbitrarily short XORs. We empirically demonstrate the
effectiveness of these bounds on model counting benchmarks and in a
Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) application motivated by the analysis of
contingency tables in statistics.Comment: The 30th Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
(AAAI-16) Conferenc
Model Checking Parse Trees
Parse trees are fundamental syntactic structures in both computational
linguistics and compilers construction. We argue in this paper that, in both
fields, there are good incentives for model-checking sets of parse trees for
some word according to a context-free grammar. We put forward the adequacy of
propositional dynamic logic (PDL) on trees in these applications, and study as
a sanity check the complexity of the corresponding model-checking problem:
although complete for exponential time in the general case, we find natural
restrictions on grammars for our applications and establish complexities
ranging from nondeterministic polynomial time to polynomial space in the
relevant cases.Comment: 21 + x page
- …