Multi-biometric templates using fingerprint and voice

As biometrics gains popularity, there is an increasing concern about privacy and misuse of biometric data held in central repositories. Furthermore, biometric verification systems face challenges arising from noise and intra-class variations. To tackle both problems, a multimodal biometric verification system combining fingerprint and voice modalities is proposed. The system combines the two modalities at the template level, using multibiometric templates. The fusion of fingerprint and voice data successfully diminishes privacy concerns by hiding the minutiae points from the fingerprint, among the artificial points generated by the features obtained from the spoken utterance of the speaker. Equal error rates are observed to be under 2% for the system where 600 utterances from 30 people have been processed and fused with a database of 400 fingerprints from 200 individuals. Accuracy is increased compared to the previous results for voice verification over the same speaker database

Text-independent bilingual speaker verification system.

Ma Bin.Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2003.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 96-102).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.iAcknowledgement --- p.ivChapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Biometrics --- p.2Chapter 1.2 --- Speaker Verification --- p.3Chapter 1.3 --- Overview of Speaker Verification Systems --- p.4Chapter 1.4 --- Text Dependency --- p.4Chapter 1.4.1 --- Text-Dependent Speaker Verification --- p.5Chapter 1.4.2 --- GMM-based Speaker Verification --- p.6Chapter 1.5 --- Language Dependency --- p.6Chapter 1.6 --- Normalization Techniques --- p.7Chapter 1.7 --- Objectives of the Thesis --- p.8Chapter 1.8 --- Thesis Organization --- p.8Chapter 2 --- Background --- p.10Chapter 2.1 --- Background Information --- p.11Chapter 2.1.1 --- Speech Signal Acquisition --- p.11Chapter 2.1.2 --- Speech Processing --- p.11Chapter 2.1.3 --- Engineering Model of Speech Signal --- p.13Chapter 2.1.4 --- Speaker Information in the Speech Signal --- p.14Chapter 2.1.5 --- Feature Parameters --- p.15Chapter 2.1.5.1 --- Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients --- p.16Chapter 2.1.5.2 --- Linear Predictive Coding Derived Cep- stral Coefficients --- p.18Chapter 2.1.5.3 --- Energy Measures --- p.20Chapter 2.1.5.4 --- Derivatives of Cepstral Coefficients --- p.21Chapter 2.1.6 --- Evaluating Speaker Verification Systems --- p.22Chapter 2.2 --- Common Techniques --- p.24Chapter 2.2.1 --- Template Model Matching Methods --- p.25Chapter 2.2.2 --- Statistical Model Methods --- p.26Chapter 2.2.2.1 --- HMM Modeling Technique --- p.27Chapter 2.2.2.2 --- GMM Modeling Techniques --- p.30Chapter 2.2.2.3 --- Gaussian Mixture Model --- p.31Chapter 2.2.2.4 --- The Advantages of GMM --- p.32Chapter 2.2.3 --- Likelihood Scoring --- p.32Chapter 2.2.4 --- General Approach to Decision Making --- p.35Chapter 2.2.5 --- Cohort Normalization --- p.35Chapter 2.2.5.1 --- Probability Score Normalization --- p.36Chapter 2.2.5.2 --- Cohort Selection --- p.37Chapter 2.3 --- Chapter Summary --- p.38Chapter 3 --- Experimental Corpora --- p.39Chapter 3.1 --- The YOHO Corpus --- p.39Chapter 3.1.1 --- Design of the YOHO Corpus --- p.39Chapter 3.1.2 --- Data Collection Process of the YOHO Corpus --- p.40Chapter 3.1.3 --- Experimentation with the YOHO Corpus --- p.41Chapter 3.2 --- CUHK Bilingual Speaker Verification Corpus --- p.42Chapter 3.2.1 --- Design of the CUBS Corpus --- p.42Chapter 3.2.2 --- Data Collection Process for the CUBS Corpus --- p.44Chapter 3.3 --- Chapter Summary --- p.46Chapter 4 --- Text-Dependent Speaker Verification --- p.47Chapter 4.1 --- Front-End Processing on the YOHO Corpus --- p.48Chapter 4.2 --- Cohort Normalization Setup --- p.50Chapter 4.3 --- HMM-based Speaker Verification Experiments --- p.53Chapter 4.3.1 --- Subword HMM Models --- p.53Chapter 4.3.2 --- Experimental Results --- p.55Chapter 4.3.2.1 --- Comparison of Feature Representations --- p.55Chapter 4.3.2.2 --- Effect of Cohort Normalization --- p.58Chapter 4.4 --- Experiments on GMM-based Speaker Verification --- p.61Chapter 4.4.1 --- Experimental Setup --- p.61Chapter 4.4.2 --- The number of Gaussian Mixture Components --- p.62Chapter 4.4.3 --- The Effect of Cohort Normalization --- p.64Chapter 4.4.4 --- Comparison of HMM and GMM --- p.65Chapter 4.5 --- Comparison with Previous Systems --- p.67Chapter 4.6 --- Chapter Summary --- p.70Chapter 5 --- Language- and Text-Independent Speaker Verification --- p.71Chapter 5.1 --- Front-End Processing of the CUBS --- p.72Chapter 5.2 --- Language- and Text-Independent Speaker Modeling --- p.73Chapter 5.3 --- Cohort Normalization --- p.74Chapter 5.4 --- Experimental Results and Analysis --- p.75Chapter 5.4.1 --- Number of Gaussian Mixture Components --- p.78Chapter 5.4.2 --- The Cohort Normalization Effect --- p.79Chapter 5.4.3 --- Language Dependency --- p.80Chapter 5.4.4 --- Language-Independency --- p.83Chapter 5.5 --- Chapter Summary --- p.88Chapter 6 --- Conclusions and Future Work --- p.90Chapter 6.1 --- Summary --- p.90Chapter 6.1.1 --- Feature Comparison --- p.91Chapter 6.1.2 --- HMM Modeling --- p.91Chapter 6.1.3 --- GMM Modeling --- p.91Chapter 6.1.4 --- Cohort Normalization --- p.92Chapter 6.1.5 --- Language Dependency --- p.92Chapter 6.2 --- Future Work --- p.93Chapter 6.2.1 --- Feature Parameters --- p.93Chapter 6.2.2 --- Model Quality --- p.93Chapter 6.2.2.1 --- Variance Flooring --- p.93Chapter 6.2.2.2 --- Silence Detection --- p.94Chapter 6.2.3 --- Conversational Speaker Verification --- p.95Bibliography --- p.10

Study of Speaker Recognition Systems

Speaker Recognition is the computing task of validating a user’s claimed identity using characteristics extracted from their voices. This technique is one of the most useful and popular biometric recognition techniques in the world especially related to areas in which security is a major concern. It can be used for authentication, surveillance, forensic speaker recognition and a number of related activities. Speaker recognition can be classified into identification and verification. Speaker identification is the process of determining which registered speaker provides a given utterance. Speaker verification, on the other hand, is the process of accepting or rejecting the identity claim of a speaker. The process of Speaker recognition consists of 2 modules namely: - feature extraction and feature matching. Feature extraction is the process in which we extract a small amount of data from the voice signal that can later be used to represent each speaker. Feature matching involves identification of the unknown speaker by comparing the extracted features from his/her voice input with the ones from a set of known speakers. Our proposed work consists of truncating a recorded voice signal, framing it, passing it through a window function, calculating the Short Term FFT, extracting its features and matching it with a stored template. Cepstral Coefficient Calculation and Mel frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) are applied for feature extraction purpose. VQLBG (Vector Quantization via Linde-Buzo-Gray), DTW (Dynamic Time Warping) and GMM (Gaussian Mixture Modelling) algorithms are used for generating template and feature matching purpose

A Review of the Fingerprint, Speaker Recognition, Face Recognition and Iris Recognition Based Biometric Identification Technologies

This paper reviews four biometric identification technologies (fingerprint, speaker recognition, face recognition and iris recognition). It discusses the mode of operation of each of the technologies and highlights their advantages and disadvantages

Multibiometric security in wireless communication systems

This thesis was submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and awarded by Brunel University, 05/08/2010.This thesis has aimed to explore an application of Multibiometrics to secured wireless communications. The medium of study for this purpose included Wi-Fi, 3G, and WiMAX, over which simulations and experimental studies were carried out to assess the performance. In specific, restriction of access to authorized users only is provided by a technique referred to hereafter as multibiometric cryptosystem. In brief, the system is built upon a complete challenge/response methodology in order to obtain a high level of security on the basis of user identification by fingerprint and further confirmation by verification of the user through text-dependent speaker recognition. First is the enrolment phase by which the database of watermarked fingerprints with memorable texts along with the voice features, based on the same texts, is created by sending them to the server through wireless channel. Later is the verification stage at which claimed users, ones who claim are genuine, are verified against the database, and it consists of five steps. Initially faced by the identification level, one is asked to first present one’s fingerprint and a memorable word, former is watermarked into latter, in order for system to authenticate the fingerprint and verify the validity of it by retrieving the challenge for accepted user. The following three steps then involve speaker recognition including the user responding to the challenge by text-dependent voice, server authenticating the response, and finally server accepting/rejecting the user. In order to implement fingerprint watermarking, i.e. incorporating the memorable word as a watermark message into the fingerprint image, an algorithm of five steps has been developed. The first three novel steps having to do with the fingerprint image enhancement (CLAHE with 'Clip Limit', standard deviation analysis and sliding neighborhood) have been followed with further two steps for embedding, and extracting the watermark into the enhanced fingerprint image utilising Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). In the speaker recognition stage, the limitations of this technique in wireless communication have been addressed by sending voice feature (cepstral coefficients) instead of raw sample. This scheme is to reap the advantages of reducing the transmission time and dependency of the data on communication channel, together with no loss of packet. Finally, the obtained results have verified the claims

Study of Speaker Verification Methods

Speaker verification is a process to accept or reject the identity claim of a speaker by comparing a set of measurements of the speaker’s utterances with a reference set of measurements of the utterance of the person whose identity is claimed.. In speaker verification, a person makes an identity claim. There are two main stages in this technique, feature extraction and feature matching. Feature extraction is the process in which we extract some useful data which can later to be used to represent the speaker. Feature matching involves identification of the unknown speaker by comparing the feature extracted from the voice with the enrolled voices of known speakers

Privacy-Preserving iVector-Based Speaker Verification

This paper introduces an efficient algorithm to develop a privacy-preserving voice verification based on iVector and linear discriminant analysis techniques. This research considers a scenario in which users enrol their voice biometric to access different services (i.e., banking). Once enrolment is completed, users can verify themselves using their voice print instead of alphanumeric passwords. Since a voice print is unique for everyone, storing it with a third-party server raises several privacy concerns. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel technique based on randomization to carry out voice authentication, which allows the user to enrol and verify their voice in the randomized domain. To achieve this, the iVector-based voice verification technique has been redesigned to work on the randomized domain. The proposed algorithm is validated using a well-known speech dataset. The proposed algorithm neither compromises the authentication accuracy nor adds additional complexity due to the randomization operations