The Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: A Literature Review and Comparative Analysis

The author reviews evidence that the bargaining structure is becoming more decentralized in Sweden, Australia, the former West Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, although In somewhat different degrees and ways from country to country. He then examines the various hypotheses that have been offered to explain the significant trend Shifts In bargaining power, as well as the diversification of corporate and worker Interests, have played a part in this change, he concludes, but work reorganization has been more influential still. He also explores how the roles of central unions and corporate industrial relations staffs are challenged by bargaining structure decentralization, and discusses the research gaps on this subject that need to be filled

Assessing the Proposed IAM, UAW, and USW Merger: Critical Issues and Potential Outcomes

[Excerpt] We examine the many difficult issues facing the IAM, UAW, and USW as they move toward the creation of a single organization. In order to place this merger in con- text, the larger issue of mergers in the American labor movement will be addressed, as will the origins and history of each of the three unions. The specific issues confronting the unions will be examined in three categories — structure, administration, and functions and services. We conclude with an assessment of the current status of the unification effort and the prospects for its realization

International Human Resource Studies: A Framework for Future Research

[Excerpt] The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for research in a broadened and redefined field of international human resource studies. Interest in international aspects of human resource management (HRM) and policy has increased markedly in recent years\u27. This should not be surprising, given the growing importance of international economic activity in general, and, in particular, the increased mobility of technology, capital, and human resources across national boundaries. We are concerned that current research falling under this label is both too narrowly conceived and ignores important work from allied areas and disciplines. We also believe that the theoretical appeal and practical value of this work would be strengthened by includng contributions from a broader array of scholars, policy makers, and practitioners who share interests in employment and industrial relations issues

The cost and benefits of collective bargaining : a survey

Collective bargaining and dispute resolution mechanisms facilitate coordination. Coordination is increasingly seen as an influential determinant of labor market and macroeconomic performance. This paper provides a systematic review of the relevant literature with a specific focus on the role that collective bargaining plays in shaping macroeconomic performance. We focus on comparative studies of labor market institutions in the OECD area that try to disentangle the impact of different institutional approaches to collective bargaining from other determinants of macroeconomic performance.Environmental Economics&Policies,Economic Theory&Research,Labor Management and Relations,Social Protections&Assistance,Labor Standards

Rent-sharing under different bargaining regimes : Evidence from linked employer-employee data

In many European countries, the majority of workers have their wage rates determined directly by industry-level agreements. For some workers, industry agreements are supplemented by firm-specific agreements. Yet, the relative importance of individual company and industry agreements (in other words, the degree of centralisation) differs drastically across industries. The authors of this paper use unique linked employer-employee data from a 2003 survey in Belgium to examine how these bargaining features affect the extent of rent-sharing. Their results show that there is substantially more rent-sharing in decentralised than in centralised industries, even when controlling for the endogeneity of profits, for heterogeneity among workers and firms and for differences in characteristics between bargaining regimes. Moreover, in centralised industries, rent-sharing is found only for workers that are covered by a company agreement. The findings of this paper finally suggest that, within decentralised industries, both firm-specific and industry-wide bargaining generate rent-sharing to the same extent.Rent-sharing, collective bargaining, propensity score matching.

Rent-Sharing under Different Bargaining Regimes: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data

In many European countries, the majority of workers have their wages directly defined by industry-level agreements. In addition, for some workers, industry agreements are complemented by firm-specific agreements. Yet, the relative importance of firm and industry agreements (in other words, the degree of centralization) differs drastically across industries. The authors of this paper use unique linked employer-employee data from a 2003 survey in Belgium to examine how these bargaining features affect the extent of rent-sharing. Their results show that there is substantially more rent-sharing in decentralized than in centralized industries, even when controlling for the endogeneity of profits, for heterogeneity among workers and firms and for differences in characteristics between bargaining regimes. Moreover, in centralized industries, rent-sharing is found only for workers that are covered by a firm agreement. Finally, results indicate that within decentralized industries, both firm and industry bargaining generate rent-sharing to the same extent.rent-sharing, collective bargaining, propensity score matching

The legal framework for corporate governance: explaining the development of contract law in Germany and the United States

How are new forms of industrial organization accommodated into a countryslegal frameworks, and what effect does this have on the ability of firms toinnovate. Variations in the broad institutional organization of the German andUS political economies result in different processes of contract lawmodernization in the two countries, with important implications for innovation trajectories. The German institutional infrastructure encourages firms todevelop cooperative diversified quality production (DQP) inter-firm strategies.This is promoted through highly regulative contract laws and the existence ofstrong trade associations that firms engage to create standardized industryframeworks. These contracting arrangements allow the diffusion ofstandardized governance structures showing firms how to create rules neededto manage complex new forms of organization. While strongly supporting DQPstrategies and discouraging opportunistic product market strategies, Germanpatterns of contract law regulation place important constraints against moreinnovative product market strategies. In the United States legal resources aredecentralized across firms, trade associations have few law-makingcompetencies, and courts do not regulate the distribution of risks across firms.Contractual frameworks are developed on a firm-by-firm basis and slowlyaccommodated within the legal system through the generation of courtprecedent. This system encourages radical innovation in the law, an importantprerequisite for innovative product market strategies more generally. However,the paper shows that a necessary trade-off of legal innovation in the US is thatcourts cannot implement German-style contract law regulation to constrainopportunism, while the decentralization of legal resource inhibits the creation ofstandardized contractual frameworks needed for DQP strategies. Through anextensive game theory analysis of bargaining between courts and large firms,the paper explains why these equilibria are maintained, despite strong incentives in the German case for some large firms to deviate. -- Wie sind neue Formen industrieller Organisation an die rechtliche Verfaßtheiteines Landes angepaßt und welche Folgen hat dies für die Innovationsfähigkeitvon Unternehmen . Generelle Unterschiede in der institutionellen Organisationder jeweiligen politischen Ökonomie in Deutschland und in den USA führen zu unterschiedlichen Formen der Modernisierung des Vertragsrechts in beidenLändern. Dies hat wichtige Auswirkungen auf den Typus der Innovations-Entwicklung.Die spezifische Ausprägung des Institutionengefüges in Deutschlandbegünstigt vor allem eine kooperativ angelegte diversifizierteQualitätsproduktion (DQP), an der mehrere Unternehmen beteiligt sind. Dieswird gestützt durch ein hochreguliertes Vertragsrecht und starkeGewerkschaften; die Verbände nutzen dies, um für alle Unternehmen geltendeRegelungen zu entwickeln. Diese Art, vertragliche Vereinbarungen zuentwickeln und zu gestalten, führt zu einer allmählichen Verbreitung allgemeingültiger Governance-Strukturen, durch die die Unternehmen erfahren, wie sie Regelungen entwickeln können, um neue, komplexe Formen der Zusammenarbeit zu managen. Das in Deutschland verbreitete Vertragsrecht erweist sich als vorteilhaft für DQP-Strategien und als hinderlich für kurzfristigorientierte Produktmarktstrategien; es führt aber auch zu schwerwiegenden Einschränkungen bei der Entwicklung innovationsorientierter Produktmarktstrategien.In den USA ist die juristische Kompetenz, gerade auch, was die Klärung juristischer Grundsatzfragen angeht, auf viele Unternehmen verteilt.Gewerkschaften haben nur geringe Möglichkeiten, die Gesetzgebung zubeeinflussen und die Gerichte regulieren nicht, wie die Risiken aus derZusammenarbeit von Unternehmen aufgeteilt werden. Die rechtlichen Rahmungen vertraglicher Vereinbarungen werden fallweise in Unternehmenentwickelt; gerichtliche Musterentscheidungen passen sie dann Schritt fürSchritt an die bestehenden gesetzlichen Regeln an. Dies begünstigt radikalereInnovationen in der Gesetzgebung; sie wiederum sind generell eine wichtige Voraussetzung für innovative Produktmarktstrategien. In dem Papier wird gezeigt, daß der schnellen Innovationskraft des amerikanischenGesetzgebungssystems als Nachteil gegenübersteht, daß die Gerichte keine Regulierungen einführen können, die dem in Deutschland entwickelten Vertragsrecht vergleichbar und durch das sehr schnelle, quasi opportunistische Marktorientierungen einzuschränken wären. Die Dezentralisierung juristischerKompetenz in den USA verhindert die Schaffung eines allgemein gültigenrechtlichen Rahmens, der wiederum Voraussetzung für eine diversifizierte Qualitätsproduktion ist.Durch eine ausführliche spieltheoretische Analyse von Aushandlungsprozessen zwischen Großunternehmen und Gerichten wirderklärt, warum sich die jeweils spezifischen Gleichgewichtssituationen erhalten, auch wenn es in Deutschland für einige Großunternehmen starke Anreize gibt, davon abzuweichen.

Product differentiation in a linear city and wage bargaining

Economides (1986) has shown that within a linear city an equilibrium exists in a two-stage location-price game when the curvature of the transportation cost function is sufficiently high. One important point is that not all of these equilibria are at maximal differentiation. In this paper we include an additional stage with decentralized wage bargaining. This intensifies price competition resulting in locations that are nearer to the extremes of the city. The magnitude of this effect depends on the bargaining power of the unions.Series: Department of Economics Working Paper Serie

How the EU can move to a higher growth path : some considerations

In the current slowdown in Europe, the United States and Japan, policy makers are vexed by the question when a recovery will come. This is the wrong question. The issue should be how a higher growth path can be reached in the long run, i.e., how the potential growth rate of our economies can be increased from the supply side. --