4,626 research outputs found
On Visibility Representations of Non-planar Graphs
A rectangle visibility representation (RVR) of a graph consists of an
assignment of axis-aligned rectangles to vertices such that for every edge
there exists a horizontal or vertical line of sight between the rectangles
assigned to its endpoints. Testing whether a graph has an RVR is known to be
NP-hard. In this paper, we study the problem of finding an RVR under the
assumption that an embedding in the plane of the input graph is fixed and we
are looking for an RVR that reflects this embedding. We show that in this case
the problem can be solved in polynomial time for general embedded graphs and in
linear time for 1-plane graphs (i.e., embedded graphs having at most one
crossing per edge). The linear time algorithm uses a precise list of forbidden
configurations, which extends the set known for straight-line drawings of
1-plane graphs. These forbidden configurations can be tested for in linear
time, and so in linear time we can test whether a 1-plane graph has an RVR and
either compute such a representation or report a negative witness. Finally, we
discuss some extensions of our study to the case when the embedding is not
fixed but the RVR can have at most one crossing per edge
L-Visibility Drawings of IC-planar Graphs
An IC-plane graph is a topological graph where every edge is crossed at most
once and no two crossed edges share a vertex. We show that every IC-plane graph
has a visibility drawing where every vertex is an L-shape, and every edge is
either a horizontal or vertical segment. As a byproduct of our drawing
technique, we prove that an IC-plane graph has a RAC drawing in quadratic area
with at most two bends per edge
Pixel and Voxel Representations of Graphs
We study contact representations for graphs, which we call pixel
representations in 2D and voxel representations in 3D. Our representations are
based on the unit square grid whose cells we call pixels in 2D and voxels in
3D. Two pixels are adjacent if they share an edge, two voxels if they share a
face. We call a connected set of pixels or voxels a blob. Given a graph, we
represent its vertices by disjoint blobs such that two blobs contain adjacent
pixels or voxels if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent. We are
interested in the size of a representation, which is the number of pixels or
voxels it consists of.
We first show that finding minimum-size representations is NP-complete. Then,
we bound representation sizes needed for certain graph classes. In 2D, we show
that, for -outerplanar graphs with vertices, pixels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary. In particular, outerplanar graphs
can be represented with a linear number of pixels, whereas general planar
graphs sometimes need a quadratic number. In 3D, voxels are
always sufficient and sometimes necessary for any -vertex graph. We improve
this bound to for graphs of treewidth and to
for graphs of genus . In particular, planar graphs
admit representations with voxels
Visibility Representations of Boxes in 2.5 Dimensions
We initiate the study of 2.5D box visibility representations (2.5D-BR) where
vertices are mapped to 3D boxes having the bottom face in the plane and
edges are unobstructed lines of sight parallel to the - or -axis. We
prove that: Every complete bipartite graph admits a 2.5D-BR; The
complete graph admits a 2.5D-BR if and only if ; Every
graph with pathwidth at most admits a 2.5D-BR, which can be computed in
linear time. We then turn our attention to 2.5D grid box representations
(2.5D-GBR) which are 2.5D-BRs such that the bottom face of every box is a unit
square at integer coordinates. We show that an -vertex graph that admits a
2.5D-GBR has at most edges and this bound is tight. Finally,
we prove that deciding whether a given graph admits a 2.5D-GBR with a given
footprint is NP-complete. The footprint of a 2.5D-BR is the set of
bottom faces of the boxes in .Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2016
- …