19,329 research outputs found
Synthesizing Functional Reactive Programs
Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) is a paradigm that has simplified the
construction of reactive programs. There are many libraries that implement
incarnations of FRP, using abstractions such as Applicative, Monads, and
Arrows. However, finding a good control flow, that correctly manages state and
switches behaviors at the right times, still poses a major challenge to
developers. An attractive alternative is specifying the behavior instead of
programming it, as made possible by the recently developed logic: Temporal
Stream Logic (TSL). However, it has not been explored so far how Control Flow
Models (CFMs), as synthesized from TSL specifications, can be turned into
executable code that is compatible with libraries building on FRP. We bridge
this gap, by showing that CFMs are indeed a suitable formalism to be turned
into Applicative, Monadic, and Arrowized FRP. We demonstrate the effectiveness
of our translations on a real-world kitchen timer application, which we
translate to a desktop application using the Arrowized FRP library Yampa, a web
application using the Monadic threepenny-gui library, and to hardware using the
Applicative hardware description language ClaSH.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1712.0024
Temporal Stream Logic: Synthesis beyond the Bools
Reactive systems that operate in environments with complex data, such as
mobile apps or embedded controllers with many sensors, are difficult to
synthesize. Synthesis tools usually fail for such systems because the state
space resulting from the discretization of the data is too large. We introduce
TSL, a new temporal logic that separates control and data. We provide a
CEGAR-based synthesis approach for the construction of implementations that are
guaranteed to satisfy a TSL specification for all possible instantiations of
the data processing functions. TSL provides an attractive trade-off for
synthesis. On the one hand, synthesis from TSL, unlike synthesis from standard
temporal logics, is undecidable in general. On the other hand, however,
synthesis from TSL is scalable, because it is independent of the complexity of
the handled data. Among other benchmarks, we have successfully synthesized a
music player Android app and a controller for an autonomous vehicle in the Open
Race Car Simulator (TORCS.
Learning-Based Synthesis of Safety Controllers
We propose a machine learning framework to synthesize reactive controllers
for systems whose interactions with their adversarial environment are modeled
by infinite-duration, two-player games over (potentially) infinite graphs. Our
framework targets safety games with infinitely many vertices, but it is also
applicable to safety games over finite graphs whose size is too prohibitive for
conventional synthesis techniques. The learning takes place in a feedback loop
between a teacher component, which can reason symbolically about the safety
game, and a learning algorithm, which successively learns an overapproximation
of the winning region from various kinds of examples provided by the teacher.
We develop a novel decision tree learning algorithm for this setting and show
that our algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a reactive safety controller if
a suitable overapproximation of the winning region can be expressed as a
decision tree. Finally, we empirically compare the performance of a prototype
implementation to existing approaches, which are based on constraint solving
and automata learning, respectively
Synthesis of Parametric Programs using Genetic Programming and Model Checking
Formal methods apply algorithms based on mathematical principles to enhance
the reliability of systems. It would only be natural to try to progress from
verification, model checking or testing a system against its formal
specification into constructing it automatically. Classical algorithmic
synthesis theory provides interesting algorithms but also alarming high
complexity and undecidability results. The use of genetic programming, in
combination with model checking and testing, provides a powerful heuristic to
synthesize programs. The method is not completely automatic, as it is fine
tuned by a user that sets up the specification and parameters. It also does not
guarantee to always succeed and converge towards a solution that satisfies all
the required properties. However, we applied it successfully on quite
nontrivial examples and managed to find solutions to hard programming
challenges, as well as to improve and to correct code. We describe here several
versions of our method for synthesizing sequential and concurrent systems.Comment: In Proceedings INFINITY 2013, arXiv:1402.661
Synthesizing Modular Invariants for Synchronous Code
In this paper, we explore different techniques to synthesize modular
invariants for synchronous code encoded as Horn clauses. Modular invariants are
a set of formulas that characterizes the validity of predicates. They are very
useful for different aspects of analysis, synthesis, testing and program
transformation. We describe two techniques to generate modular invariants for
code written in the synchronous dataflow language Lustre. The first technique
directly encodes the synchronous code in a modular fashion. While in the second
technique, we synthesize modular invariants starting from a monolithic
invariant. Both techniques, take advantage of analysis techniques based on
property-directed reachability. We also describe a technique to minimize the
synthesized invariants.Comment: In Proceedings HCVS 2014, arXiv:1412.082
Sciduction: Combining Induction, Deduction, and Structure for Verification and Synthesis
Even with impressive advances in automated formal methods, certain problems
in system verification and synthesis remain challenging. Examples include the
verification of quantitative properties of software involving constraints on
timing and energy consumption, and the automatic synthesis of systems from
specifications. The major challenges include environment modeling,
incompleteness in specifications, and the complexity of underlying decision
problems.
This position paper proposes sciduction, an approach to tackle these
challenges by integrating inductive inference, deductive reasoning, and
structure hypotheses. Deductive reasoning, which leads from general rules or
concepts to conclusions about specific problem instances, includes techniques
such as logical inference and constraint solving. Inductive inference, which
generalizes from specific instances to yield a concept, includes algorithmic
learning from examples. Structure hypotheses are used to define the class of
artifacts, such as invariants or program fragments, generated during
verification or synthesis. Sciduction constrains inductive and deductive
reasoning using structure hypotheses, and actively combines inductive and
deductive reasoning: for instance, deductive techniques generate examples for
learning, and inductive reasoning is used to guide the deductive engines.
We illustrate this approach with three applications: (i) timing analysis of
software; (ii) synthesis of loop-free programs, and (iii) controller synthesis
for hybrid systems. Some future applications are also discussed
- …