Surprising results on phylogenetic tree building methods based on molecular sequences

Background We analyze phylogenetic tree building methods from molecular sequences (PTMS). These are methods which base their construction solely on sequences, coding DNA or amino acids. Results Our first result is a statistically significant evaluation of 176 PTMSs done by comparing trees derived from 193138 orthologous groups of proteins using a new measure of quality between trees. This new measure, called the Intra measure, is very consistent between different groups of species and strong in the sense that it separates the methods with high confidence. The second result is the comparison of the trees against trees derived from accepted taxonomies, the Taxon measure. We consider the NCBI taxonomic classification and their derived topologies as the most accepted biological consensus on phylogenies, which are also available in electronic form. The correlation between the two measures is remarkably high, which supports both measures simultaneously. Conclusions The big surprise of the evaluation is that the maximum likelihood methods do not score well, minimal evolution distance methods over MSA-induced alignments score consistently better. This comparison also allows us to rank different components of the tree building methods, like MSAs, substitution matrices, ML tree builders, distance methods, etc. It is also clear that there is a difference between Metazoa and the rest, which points out to evolution leaving different molecular traces. We also think that these measures of quality of trees will motivate the design of new PTMSs as it is now easier to evaluate them with certainty.ISSN:1471-210

Robust Algorithms for Detecting Hidden Structure in Biological Data

Biological data, such as molecular abundance measurements and protein sequences, harbor complex hidden structure that reflects its underlying biological mechanisms. For example, high-throughput abundance measurements provide a snapshot the global state of a living cell, while homologous protein sequences encode the residue-level logic of the proteins\u27 function and provide a snapshot of the evolutionary trajectory of the protein family. In this work I describe algorithmic approaches and analysis software I developed for uncovering hidden structure in both kinds of data. Clustering is an unsurpervised machine learning technique commonly used to map the structure of data collected in high-throughput experiments, such as quantification of gene expression by DNA microarrays or short-read sequencing. Clustering algorithms always yield a partitioning of the data, but relying on a single partitioning solution can lead to spurious conclusions. In particular, noise in the data can cause objects to fall into the same cluster by chance rather than due to meaningful association. In the first part of this thesis I demonstrate approaches to clustering data robustly in the presence of noise and apply robust clustering to analyze the transcriptional response to injury in a neuron cell. In the second part of this thesis I describe identifying hidden specificity determining residues (SDPs) from alignments of protein sequences descended through gene duplication from a common ancestor (paralogs) and apply the approach to identify numerous putative SDPs in bacterial transcription factors in the LacI family. Finally, I describe and demonstrate a new algorithm for reconstructing the history of duplications by which paralogs descended from their common ancestor. This algorithm addresses the complexity of such reconstruction due to indeterminate or erroneous homology assignments made by sequence alignment algorithms and to the vast prevalence of divergence through speciation over divergence through gene duplication in protein evolution